“Controversy Erupts: US Census Confirms Illegal Aliens Counted, Giving Republicans 27 Seat Advantage”
Republican seat advantage, illegal immigration impact, U.S. census count 2025
—————–

In a recent exchange between republican Representative Nancy Mace and US Census Director Robert Santos, a controversial topic was brought to light regarding the inclusion of illegal aliens in the US census. Mace directly questioned Santos, asking if illegal aliens, who enter the country unlawfully, are counted in the census. Santos responded with a simple “Yes,” sparking further debate on the implications of including this population in the census data.

The issue at hand is not just a matter of statistical accuracy, but also has significant political ramifications. According to Mace, if illegal aliens were not included in the census count, Republicans would have a 27-seat advantage in Congress. This statement highlights the potential impact that including this population in the census data can have on political representation and power distribution.

Critics argue that counting illegal aliens in the census could skew representation in favor of areas with higher populations of undocumented immigrants. This could potentially lead to resources and political influence being allocated to regions with a larger number of illegal aliens, at the expense of areas with lower populations of undocumented individuals.

On the other hand, proponents of including illegal aliens in the census argue that it is necessary to have an accurate count of the total population, regardless of legal status. They believe that excluding this population would result in an incomplete picture of the demographic makeup of the country, which could have negative consequences for resource allocation and planning.

The debate over whether to include illegal aliens in the census is not a new one, but it has gained renewed attention in recent years. As the country continues to grapple with issues of immigration and border security, the question of how to accurately account for all residents, regardless of legal status, remains a contentious topic.

Ultimately, the decision on whether to include illegal aliens in the census count has far-reaching implications for political representation, resource allocation, and overall demographic analysis. As the debate continues, it is clear that this issue will remain a point of contention for lawmakers, policymakers, and the general public alike.

Rep Nancy Mace “Are illegal aliens, the people that break the law coming into our country when they enter in the door illegally, are they counted in the U.S. census, yes or no?

US Census Director Robert Santos “Yes”

Republicans would have a 27 seat advantage without illegals pic.twitter.com/UTlrzGsh9I

— Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes) June 22, 2025

In a recent exchange on Twitter, Representative Nancy Mace raised an important question about the U.S. census and its inclusion of illegal aliens. This conversation sheds light on a controversial topic that has significant implications for political representation in the United States.

Rep. Mace asked, “Are illegal aliens, the people that break the law coming into our country when they enter in the door illegally, are they counted in the U.S. census, yes or no?” The response from the US Census Director, Robert Santos, was a straightforward “Yes.” This revelation has sparked a debate about the impact of counting illegal aliens in the census, particularly in terms of political representation.

One of the key points raised in this discussion is the potential advantage that Republicans would have in Congress if illegal aliens were not included in the census count. According to the data presented, Republicans would have a 27-seat advantage without the inclusion of illegal aliens in the census. This statistic highlights the significant impact that counting illegal aliens can have on the distribution of political power in the United States.

The inclusion of illegal aliens in the census has long been a contentious issue. Critics argue that counting individuals who are in the country illegally skews representation and unfairly benefits certain political parties. On the other hand, proponents of including illegal aliens in the census argue that it is important to have an accurate count of the population, regardless of legal status.

The debate over the inclusion of illegal aliens in the census is not just a theoretical or political issue—it has real-world consequences. The allocation of congressional seats and electoral votes is based on census data, so the accuracy of that data is crucial for fair representation in government. By counting illegal aliens in the census, some argue that certain states and districts are given more political power than they would have if only legal residents were counted.

It is important to note that the census is meant to be a comprehensive count of the entire population, regardless of citizenship status. The census plays a crucial role in determining the distribution of federal funds, representation in Congress, and electoral votes. Excluding certain groups from the census count could have far-reaching implications for communities across the country.

While the debate over the inclusion of illegal aliens in the census is complex and multifaceted, it is clear that this issue has significant implications for political representation and the distribution of power in the United States. As policymakers and lawmakers grapple with this issue, it is essential to consider the broader implications of how the census count impacts our democracy and the allocation of resources.

In conclusion, the conversation between Rep. Nancy Mace and US Census Director Robert Santos has sparked an important discussion about the inclusion of illegal aliens in the census. The revelation that counting illegal aliens can have a significant impact on political representation underscores the importance of this issue. As the debate continues, it will be crucial to consider the implications of how the census count influences our democracy and the distribution of political power in the United States.