“Outrage as Calls Grow for US to Exit UN and Kick Out ‘Worthless’ Elitist Bureaucrats – Time to Cut Waste?”
United States withdrawal from United Nations, Expel elitist bureaucrats, Wasted time and money in UN, Global politics and US relations, International diplomacy in 2025, Anti-UN sentiments in US
—————–

In a recent tweet, Roger Stone expressed his frustration with the United Nations, calling for the United States to withdraw from the organization and expel its bureaucrats from the country. Stone characterized the UN as a “colossal waste of time and money” and deemed its elitist bureaucrats as “worthless.”

Stone’s tweet reflects a sentiment shared by many critics of the United Nations, who argue that the organization is ineffective, inefficient, and out of touch with the needs of its member states. Critics often point to the UN’s bloated bureaucracy, lack of accountability, and failure to address pressing global issues as reasons for their disillusionment with the organization.

While Stone’s call for the United States to withdraw from the United Nations may be provocative, it is not without precedent. The US has a history of contentious relations with the UN, with some politicians and pundits advocating for a reduction of US involvement in the organization.

However, it is important to note that the United Nations plays a crucial role in promoting international cooperation, peace, and security. The UN provides a forum for member states to address common challenges, such as climate change, poverty, and conflict, and serves as a platform for diplomacy and conflict resolution.

In conclusion, Roger Stone’s tweet criticizing the United Nations highlights the ongoing debate surrounding the organization’s effectiveness and relevance in today’s world. While there are valid criticisms of the UN, it is essential to recognize the important role that the organization plays in addressing global issues and promoting peace and security. Ultimately, the decision to withdraw from the United Nations is a complex and consequential one that should be carefully considered in light of the organization’s overall impact on the international community.

This would be an excellent time for the United States to withdraw from the United Nations and expel all of those worthless elitist bureaucrats from the country. What a colossal waste of time and money.

— Roger Stone (@RogerJStoneJr) June 22, 2025

If you’ve been following the news lately, you may have come across a tweet from Roger Stone advocating for the United States to withdraw from the United Nations and expel all elitist bureaucrats. While this statement may seem controversial to some, it brings up an important discussion about the role of the United States in the international community. Let’s delve deeper into this topic and explore the implications of such a move.

Is it Time for the United States to Withdraw from the United Nations?

The United Nations was established in 1945 with the goal of promoting international cooperation and peace. Over the years, it has played a crucial role in addressing global issues such as poverty, conflict, and human rights abuses. However, critics like Roger Stone argue that the organization has become bloated and ineffective, with elitist bureaucrats who are out of touch with the needs of everyday Americans.

While withdrawing from the United Nations may seem drastic, it is worth considering the arguments put forth by those who believe that the organization no longer serves the best interests of the United States. Proponents of withdrawal argue that the United States could better allocate the resources currently spent on the UN to address domestic issues such as healthcare, education, and infrastructure.

The Cost of Membership

One of the main arguments against the United States’ continued membership in the United Nations is the financial burden it places on the country. The United States is the largest funder of the UN, contributing billions of dollars each year to support its operations. Critics argue that this money could be better spent on programs that directly benefit American citizens, rather than funding an organization that they believe is ineffective.

It is important to note, however, that the United States’ membership in the United Nations also comes with benefits. The organization provides a platform for the United States to engage with other countries on important issues such as national security, trade, and climate change. By withdrawing from the UN, the United States could potentially lose out on valuable opportunities to collaborate with other nations and influence global policies.

The Impact on Global Diplomacy

Another consideration when discussing the United States’ potential withdrawal from the United Nations is the impact it would have on global diplomacy. The UN serves as a forum for countries to come together and address shared challenges, such as pandemics, terrorism, and climate change. By leaving the organization, the United States could isolate itself from the international community and weaken its ability to shape global events.

Additionally, withdrawing from the United Nations could damage the United States’ reputation on the world stage. The country has long been seen as a leader in promoting democracy and human rights, and leaving the UN could undermine its credibility as a champion of these values.

Conclusion

While the idea of the United States withdrawing from the United Nations may seem appealing to some, it is important to consider the potential consequences of such a move. The UN plays a vital role in addressing global challenges and promoting international cooperation, and the United States’ membership in the organization has both costs and benefits. Rather than withdrawing entirely, perhaps a more nuanced approach to reforming the UN and addressing concerns about its effectiveness would be a more prudent course of action.

In the end, the decision to withdraw from the United Nations is a complex one that requires careful consideration of the implications for the United States and its role in the international community. As the debate continues, it is essential to weigh the pros and cons of such a move and consider how best to advance American interests while upholding the values of peace, cooperation, and diplomacy on the global stage.