Tulsi Gabbard’s Shocking Betrayal: Will She Be Remembered as a war Hawk Puppet?
Tulsi Gabbard legacy, Iran war, political puppet, 2025
—————–

The tweet posted by Jackson Hinkle on June 20, 2025, directed at Tulsi Gabbard has caused quite a stir on social media. In the tweet, Hinkle accuses Gabbard of betraying her principles and selling out by supporting military action against Iran. He compares this decision to Colin Powell’s infamous claim about Iraq possessing weapons of mass destruction, implying that Gabbard’s legacy will be tainted by her support for war.

The tweet begins with a familiar greeting, “Hi Tulsi, long time no see,” setting a casual tone before launching into a scathing critique of Gabbard’s actions. Hinkle accuses Gabbard of being manipulated by those in power, referring to her as a puppet dancing to their tune. This imagery paints Gabbard as a pawn in a larger political game, willing to sacrifice her beliefs for the approval of others.

The mention of Camp David suggests that Gabbard was excluded from important decision-making discussions, further reinforcing the idea that she is being used by those with more influence. The tweet concludes with a damning verdict, declaring that Gabbard has sold out by supporting military intervention in Iran.

Overall, Hinkle’s tweet is a powerful condemnation of Gabbard’s perceived betrayal of her principles. By likening her actions to Powell’s role in the Iraq war, he effectively links her to a controversial and widely criticized moment in recent history. The use of strong language and vivid imagery makes this tweet stand out, ensuring that it will be remembered as a significant moment in the ongoing debate over Gabbard’s political decisions.

Hi Tulsi,

Long time no see.

This tweet will forever live on as your Colin Powell ‘Iraq has WMD’ moment.

If we go to war in Iran, this will be your legacy.

They sidelined you at Camp David, but you’re still dancing as their puppet.

Congratulations, you SOLD OUT! pic.twitter.com/V086rNBff6

— Jackson Hinkle (@jacksonhinklle) June 20, 2025

In a recent tweet directed at Tulsi Gabbard, Jackson Hinkle criticized her for potentially leading the United States into a war with Iran, comparing it to Colin Powell’s infamous claim about Iraq possessing weapons of mass destruction. The tweet suggested that Gabbard’s actions could tarnish her legacy and label her as a puppet for those in power. Let’s delve deeper into the implications of this tweet and what it means for Gabbard’s political career.

### @DNIGabbard Hi Tulsi, Long Time No See

The opening line of the tweet sets the tone for what follows. The informal greeting of “Hi Tulsi, Long time no see” suggests a familiarity between the author, Jackson Hinkle, and Tulsi Gabbard. It creates a sense of intimacy and directness in the message being conveyed. This sets the stage for a personal and engaging discussion about Gabbard’s recent actions and their potential consequences.

### This Tweet Will Forever Live On

The reference to Colin Powell’s ‘Iraq has WMD’ moment is a powerful comparison that carries significant weight. It draws a parallel between Gabbard’s actions and a notorious event in American history that had far-reaching consequences. By linking Gabbard to Powell’s statement, the tweet implies that her decisions could have similarly grave repercussions. It serves as a warning about the potential impact of Gabbard’s actions on the nation and her own reputation.

### If We Go to War in Iran

The mention of a potential war with Iran raises the stakes even higher. It suggests that Gabbard’s actions could lead the country into a dangerous and costly conflict. The tweet implies that Gabbard’s involvement in such a scenario would define her legacy and how she is remembered by the public. It highlights the gravity of the situation and the importance of Gabbard’s decisions in shaping the future of the nation.

### They Sidelined You at Camp David

The reference to being sidelined at Camp David implies that Gabbard has been marginalized or excluded from important decision-making processes. It suggests that despite her position or influence, she is not truly in control of the situation. The tweet paints a picture of Gabbard as a puppet being manipulated by more powerful forces. It raises questions about her agency and autonomy in the political landscape.

### Congratulations, You SOLD OUT!

The final line of the tweet delivers a harsh judgment on Gabbard’s actions. It accuses her of betraying her principles or selling out to interests that do not align with the public good. The use of capital letters and exclamation marks adds emphasis to the accusation, driving home the severity of the criticism. It leaves a lasting impression of disappointment and disillusionment with Gabbard’s choices.

In conclusion, Jackson Hinkle’s tweet to Tulsi Gabbard is a poignant reminder of the responsibilities and consequences that come with political power. It serves as a warning about the potential pitfalls of prioritizing personal gain over the well-being of the nation. As Gabbard navigates the complexities of her political career, she must heed the messages being sent her way and consider the long-term impact of her decisions. The tweet serves as a call to action for Gabbard to reflect on her choices and uphold the values that she claims to represent.