Fox news‘ Arizona Call for Biden: The Shocking Truth Behind the Big Lie!
Fox News election coverage, Murdoch family influence, America First movement
—————–

Understanding the Controversy Surrounding Fox News and the 2020 Election

The tweet from DC_Draino, which makes bold claims about Fox News and the 2020 presidential election, has sparked significant conversation and controversy. The statement, "When Fox News called Arizona for Biden with only 74% in, that’s when I know they were in on the real Big Lie," suggests that the network’s decision to declare Joe Biden the winner in Arizona was part of a larger conspiracy against the America First movement. This article will summarize the implications of these claims, explore the context in which they were made, and consider the reactions they have elicited.

The Significance of Arizona’s Call

In the 2020 presidential election, Arizona was one of the key battleground states that ultimately contributed to Joe Biden’s victory. Fox News’ early call declaring Biden the winner in Arizona, despite only 74% of the votes being counted, generated immediate backlash from supporters of then-President Donald trump. The timing of this call is pivotal, as it was one of the first indicators of a potential shift in the election’s outcome, leading to accusations of media bias and manipulation.

The Claims of a "Big Lie"

The term "Big Lie" has been associated with various conspiracy theories surrounding the legitimacy of the 2020 election results. In the context of the tweet, DC_Draino implies that Fox News and its leadership—specifically the Murdoch family—are part of a coordinated effort to undermine the America First movement that Trump represents. The assertion regarding the Murdochs being "foreign-born globalists" adds a layer of accusation that questions their loyalty to American ideals and values, further fueling the narrative of betrayal among certain political factions.

The Role of Media in Elections

The media plays a crucial role in shaping public perception during elections. The early calls for election results can influence voter sentiment and potentially sway undecided voters. In the case of Arizona, Fox News’ decision to call the state for Biden was met with criticism from Trump supporters who felt that such actions were premature and contributed to the narrative that the election was being "stolen" from Trump. The tweet highlights a sentiment shared among many who believe that mainstream media outlets, including Fox News, have abandoned their audience’s interests in favor of a broader, more globalist agenda.

Reactions from the Public and Political Figures

The tweet has garnered attention not only for its content but also for the broader implications it signifies within American politics. Supporters of Trump have rallied around the idea that mainstream media outlets are complicit in a larger scheme to undermine conservative values and the America First doctrine. This has led to discussions about media accountability, transparency, and the need for alternative news sources that align with the beliefs of conservative constituents.

Critics of the tweet argue that such claims contribute to a dangerous narrative that can incite division and distrust in democratic institutions. They contend that the integrity of the media is essential for a functioning democracy and that accusations of conspiracy without substantial evidence can lead to harmful societal repercussions.

The Murdoch Family and Their Influence

The Murdoch family, owners of Fox News, have long been influential in shaping conservative media. However, their foreign origins have been a point of contention among some factions within the republican base, particularly those who feel that true American identity is being compromised by global influences. This sentiment is echoed in DC_Draino’s tweet, where the Murdochs are labeled as "globalists" who oppose the America First movement.

The criticism directed at the Murdoch family reflects a growing trend among certain political groups that perceive globalization as a threat to national sovereignty. This narrative has been a rallying cry for populist movements across the globe, as they seek to reclaim control over national policies and prioritize domestic interests over international obligations.

The Broader Implications of Election Integrity

The discussion surrounding the 2020 election results, particularly in states like Arizona, has broader implications for the integrity of future elections in the United States. The allegations of fraud and manipulation have led to increased scrutiny of electoral processes, with many advocates calling for reforms to ensure transparency and trust in the electoral system.

As the political landscape continues to evolve, the need for dialogue and understanding between differing viewpoints becomes increasingly important. While accusations of media bias and conspiracy theories may resonate with certain groups, fostering a constructive conversation around election integrity and media responsibility is essential for the health of American democracy.

Conclusion

DC_Draino’s tweet encapsulates a significant portion of the ongoing discourse surrounding the 2020 election and the role of media in shaping public perception. The claims made reflect a broader sentiment among some conservative factions that feel betrayed by mainstream outlets and are concerned about the influence of foreign-born entities on American politics.

As the nation grapples with the implications of the past election, the call for greater accountability from media organizations and a commitment to election integrity remains at the forefront of political discussion. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for anyone seeking to navigate the complex landscape of American politics in the wake of one of the most contentious elections in recent history.

In summary, the controversy surrounding Fox News’ call for Arizona and the subsequent reactions highlight the fragile relationship between media, politics, and public trust. As conversations around these topics continue, it is vital to approach them with a commitment to truth, transparency, and a shared understanding of democratic principles.

When Fox News called Arizona for Biden with only 74% in, that’s when I know they were in on the *real* Big Lie

The Murdochs are all foreign-born globalists who hate the America First movement https://t.co/FCJtSCHk5t

— DC_Draino (@DC_Draino) June 19, 2025

When Fox News called Arizona for Biden with only 74% in, that’s when I know they were in on the *real* Big Lie

Ah, the 2020 election. It was a whirlwind of emotions, controversies, and unprecedented moments that will be remembered for years to come. One of the most talked-about moments was when Fox News called Arizona for Biden with only 74% of the votes counted. This decision sent shockwaves through the political landscape and left many people questioning the integrity of the election reporting. It was more than just a call—it was a pivotal moment that sparked conspiracy theories, debates, and distrust in mainstream media.

To many, including political commentators and everyday Americans, this moment was a clear indication that something was off. It wasn’t just about the numbers; it was about the narrative being pushed by major news outlets. The idea that Fox News, a channel often associated with conservative viewpoints, would make such a bold call so early in the counting process raised eyebrows. It led to numerous discussions about whether they had an agenda, and if so, what that agenda was.

The Murdochs are all foreign-born globalists who hate the America First movement

At the heart of this controversy is the Murdoch family, the owners of Fox News. Many people have pointed fingers at their foreign ties and influence, labeling them as “foreign-born globalists.” This perspective stems from a belief that their globalist views contradict the America First movement, which advocates for prioritizing American interests over international ones. This sentiment is echoed by many who feel that the Murdochs’ decisions reflect a larger, more insidious agenda against American sovereignty.

Critics argue that the Murdochs and their media empire have consistently undermined the values of the America First movement. They suggest that by calling Arizona for Biden prematurely, Fox News was not only influencing the election but also betraying the trust of their audience. This has led to a significant backlash, with many loyal viewers feeling alienated and questioning whether they should continue supporting a network that seems to oppose their ideals.

Understanding the Impact of Early Calls in Elections

When Fox News called Arizona for Biden, it wasn’t just a simple announcement. It was a moment that shifted the perception of the election. Early calls can sway public opinion and impact voter behavior. If people believe that a candidate is winning or losing before all the votes are counted, it can affect turnout and the overall mood of the electorate. This is why many believe that networks should exercise extreme caution when making such calls.

The decision to call Arizona with only 74% of the votes in was met with skepticism. Many argued that it could lead to misinformation and confusion among voters. The concern wasn’t just about Arizona; it was about the integrity of the electoral process as a whole. People wanted to know: Were these calls based on solid data, or were they influenced by political biases? This uncertainty has fueled ongoing debates about media responsibility and accountability.

The Role of Media in Shaping Political Narratives

Media plays a crucial role in shaping political narratives. News outlets like Fox News hold significant power over public perception. When they make bold claims, especially in a highly polarized environment, the consequences can be far-reaching. The call for Arizona was seen by many as an attempt to control the narrative and steer public opinion in a direction that aligned with certain political interests.

This has raised questions about the ethics of journalism. Should media outlets prioritize objectivity and accuracy over ratings and viewership? The incident has highlighted the need for responsible reporting, especially during critical moments like elections. When the stakes are high, the responsibility of media becomes even greater.

Public Reaction and the Rise of Alternative Media

In the aftermath of Fox News calling Arizona for Biden, there was a marked shift in viewer loyalty. Many conservative viewers felt betrayed and began turning to alternative media sources that aligned more closely with their views. This has led to a fragmentation of media consumption, with audiences seeking out platforms that they believe reflect their values and beliefs.

As a result, platforms like Newsmax and One America News Network have seen a surge in viewership. People are looking for news that resonates with their perspective, and the fallout from the Arizona call has only accelerated this trend. This shift poses challenges for traditional media outlets, which now find themselves competing in a landscape that is increasingly divided along ideological lines.

Trust in Media and Its Consequences

The trust deficit in mainstream media has serious implications for democracy. When people lose faith in the ability of news organizations to provide accurate and unbiased information, they turn to alternative sources, which can lead to echo chambers and further polarization. The call for Arizona by Fox News may have been a catalyst for this erosion of trust, but it’s part of a larger trend that has been developing over the years.

As the media landscape continues to evolve, the challenge for journalists and news organizations is to rebuild that trust. This means prioritizing transparency, accountability, and integrity in reporting. It’s not enough to simply report the news; media outlets must also engage with their audiences and address the concerns that have led to widespread skepticism.

The Future of Political Reporting

Looking ahead, the future of political reporting will likely be shaped by the lessons learned from incidents like the Arizona call. Journalists will need to navigate a complex landscape where trust is fragile, and audiences are more discerning than ever before. The demand for responsible, fact-based journalism will only grow as people seek out reliable information in an age of misinformation and sensationalism.

For news organizations, this means committing to rigorous fact-checking, providing context, and acknowledging the limitations of their reporting. The goal should be to empower audiences with the knowledge they need to make informed decisions, rather than simply pushing a narrative or agenda.

Conclusion

The events surrounding Fox News calling Arizona for Biden with only 74% of the votes in have sparked ongoing conversations about media responsibility and the impact of early election calls. As we reflect on these events, it’s crucial to consider the role of media in shaping political narratives and the trust that audiences place in these outlets. Moving forward, the focus should be on fostering a media environment that prioritizes accuracy, transparency, and accountability, ensuring that the public can engage with news in a meaningful way.