Former Coast Guard officer Arrested for trump Assassination Threat: What’s 8647?
Coast Guard officer arrest, threats against politicians, assassination attempts in 2025
—————–

Arrest of Former Coast Guard Officer for Threatening President Trump

In a shocking turn of events, a former Coast Guard officer, Peter Stinson, has been arrested for allegedly threatening to assassinate former President Donald Trump. This incident has garnered significant attention in the media and on social platforms, especially given the serious nature of the allegations and the timing of the threats.

Background of the Incident

The arrest occurred on June 17, 2025, and has raised concerns about the safety of public figures, especially in the context of escalating political tensions in the United States. Stinson, who served in the United States Coast Guard from 1988 until his retirement in 2021, reportedly made these threats online, referencing a cryptic code "8647" that some speculate may have connections to former FBI Director James Comey, whose post was subsequently deleted.

The tweet from Eric Daugherty that broke the news highlights the shocking nature of the allegations and the potential implications for national security. The tweet has sparked a flurry of responses across social media platforms, with users expressing outrage, concern, and disbelief over the incident.

The Nature of the Threats

The specific details surrounding Stinson’s threats and the context in which they were made are still unfolding. However, using social media to make threats against a sitting or former president is a serious offense and is often met with swift legal action. The reference to "8647" remains unclear, but it has led to speculation and theories regarding its meaning and connection to broader political narratives.

Legal Implications

Threatening a former president is considered a federal crime, and those found guilty of such actions can face serious penalties, including substantial prison time. The FBI and other law enforcement agencies often take these threats seriously, especially when they involve individuals with military backgrounds, as they may have access to resources and knowledge that could pose real threats.

Peter Stinson’s background as a Coast Guard officer adds another layer of complexity to the situation. His military service could potentially be viewed as both a mitigating factor and a cause for greater concern due to the skills and training he possesses.

Public Reaction and Media Coverage

The incident has sparked widespread media coverage and public discourse. Many commentators are focusing on the implications of such threats in today’s political climate, where divisiveness and hostility can lead to dangerous outcomes. The situation has reignited discussions about political rhetoric, the responsibilities of public figures, and the role of social media in amplifying threats and violence.

On social media platforms, users are actively debating the appropriateness of Stinson’s actions, the implications for national security, and the broader context of political violence in the United States. This incident serves as a reminder of the importance of monitoring online activity, especially for individuals with military backgrounds.

Connection to James Comey

The mention of "8647" in connection with James Comey raises questions about the potential motivations behind Stinson’s threats. Comey, who served as the FBI Director under President Trump, has been a polarizing figure in American politics. His tenure was marked by controversies, including the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election and the handling of Hillary Clinton’s email investigation. The deletion of Comey’s post referenced in Stinson’s threats adds an extra layer of intrigue and speculation.

The Ongoing Investigation

As the investigation continues, more details are expected to emerge regarding Stinson’s motivations and the circumstances surrounding his threats. Law enforcement agencies, including the FBI, are likely to conduct a thorough investigation to ascertain the seriousness of the threats and any potential plans that may have been in the works.

The Importance of Addressing Political Violence

This incident underscores the critical need for society to address the issue of political violence and threats against public officials. The increasing frequency of such threats necessitates a robust response from law enforcement and a collective societal effort to foster a more civil political discourse.

Public figures, elected officials, and citizens alike must remain vigilant in condemning violence and threats, promoting dialogue, and finding constructive ways to engage in political discussions without resorting to intimidation or violence.

Conclusion

The arrest of Peter Stinson, a former Coast Guard officer, for threatening to assassinate former President Trump is a stark reminder of the fragility of political discourse in today’s climate. As investigations unfold, it is crucial for society to reflect on the implications of such threats and work toward fostering a political environment that values dialogue over violence. This incident serves as a call to action for all individuals to engage responsibly in political discussions and to prioritize safety and security in our democratic processes.

As this story develops, individuals interested in following the latest updates can do so by monitoring news outlets and social media channels. The implications of Stinson’s actions will likely resonate in discussions about political safety and the responsibilities of public officials moving forward.

#BREAKING: A former Coast Guard officer has been arrested for threatening to assas*inate President Trump, including a reference to “8647” following James Comey’s now-deleted post – Fox

Peter Stinson served in the USCG from 1988 to 2021.

— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) June 17, 2025

BREAKING: A Former Coast Guard Officer Arrested for Threatening to Assassinate President Trump

In a startling development, a former Coast Guard officer named Peter Stinson has been arrested for allegedly threatening to assassinate President Trump. This news has sparked intense discussion across social media and news platforms. Stinson’s arrest comes with chilling details, including a reference to “8647,” which follows a now-deleted post by James Comey. The implications of this incident are far-reaching, and it’s essential to unpack what this means for national security and the ongoing political climate.

Who is Peter Stinson?

Peter Stinson served in the United States Coast Guard (USCG) from 1988 to 2021, making him a veteran with decades of service. Given his background, one would typically associate someone with such experience with patriotism and loyalty to their country. However, the recent allegations paint a different picture, raising questions about the motivations and mindset of individuals who may turn against their own leaders.

The Nature of the Threat

The arrest of Stinson is particularly alarming due to the nature of the threats he allegedly made against President Trump. Threatening to assassinate a sitting president is a federal crime, and it reflects a concerning trend where individuals feel emboldened to express violent intentions publicly. The mention of “8647” in connection with James Comey’s social media activity adds another layer of complexity to this case. While the exact meaning of “8647” remains unclear, it has piqued the interest of both law enforcement and the public.

James Comey’s Now-Deleted Post

James Comey, the former FBI director, has been a controversial figure in American politics, especially during the Trump administration. His now-deleted post, which Stinson referred to, has led many to speculate about the connection between the two. Was Stinson inspired by Comey’s comments, or was it a mere coincidence? The deletion of the post raises questions about its content and the context in which it was shared. The tweet’s removal suggests that it may have contained sensitive information or opinions that could have incited further unrest.

Implications for National Security

The arrest of a former military official for making threats against a president raises serious concerns about national security. It highlights the potential for individuals with military backgrounds to harbor extremist views, leading to dangerous actions. This incident puts a spotlight on the need for better monitoring of former service members and their mental health, especially when they express violent ideologies online.

Social Media’s Role in Threats

In today’s digital age, social media plays a significant role in how individuals communicate and express their thoughts. This case exemplifies how quickly threats can escalate from mere words to actionable plans. The rapid dissemination of information can lead to misunderstandings or, in this case, alarming threats. It also raises questions about the responsibility of social media platforms to monitor and address harmful content. As threats become more public, the potential for real-world consequences increases.

Public Reaction and Media Coverage

The news of Stinson’s arrest has undoubtedly created a stir across various media outlets and social media platforms. Many people are expressing their shock and disbelief, while others are using this incident as a way to discuss the broader implications of political violence. News organizations like Fox have reported on the event, highlighting the urgency of the situation. The public discourse surrounding this incident reflects a growing concern regarding political polarization and the potential for violence.

Understanding the Context

To fully grasp the significance of this incident, it’s important to understand the current political landscape in the United States. Tensions have been running high in recent years, with increasing polarization among various factions. The rise of extremist groups and individuals who feel disenfranchised by the political system has contributed to a climate where threats of violence can emerge. This incident serves as a reminder that political discourse can quickly devolve into dangerous territory.

The Legal Ramifications

Legally speaking, threats against a sitting president are taken very seriously. Stinson faces severe consequences, including potential federal charges that could lead to significant prison time. The authorities are likely to conduct a thorough investigation to determine the full extent of his actions and any possible accomplices. This case will likely set a precedent for how similar threats are handled in the future.

What Comes Next?

As the legal proceedings unfold, many are left wondering what the future holds for Peter Stinson and the implications of his actions. Will this case lead to a broader discussion about the mental health of veterans and the need for support systems? Will it prompt lawmakers to take a closer look at the rise of political violence? The answers to these questions may shape the national conversation in the coming months.

Final Thoughts

The arrest of a former Coast Guard officer for threatening to assassinate President Trump is a disturbing reminder of the fragility of our political climate. It raises essential questions about the responsibilities of individuals, the role of social media, and the need for vigilance in protecting national security. As this story develops, it will be crucial to monitor not just the legal proceedings but also the broader societal implications. The stakes are high, and the conversation around political violence is more important than ever.

For more updates on this developing story, stay tuned to reliable news sources like Fox News and others that are closely following the case. Understanding the complexities behind incidents like these is vital for fostering a safer political environment for everyone.