Iran’s Mixed Signals: Will They Negotiate with US and Israel, or Continue Retaliation?
Iran war negotiation strategy, US-Iran conflict resolution, Disinformation tactics in international relations
—————–

The tweet by Glenn Greenwald, posted on June 16, 2025, highlights the contrasting narratives presented by different news outlets regarding Iran’s stance on negotiations with the US and Israel. The tweet features screenshots of headlines from two reputable news sources, the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) and CNN, which provide conflicting information on Iran’s willingness to engage in talks.

According to the WSJ headline, Iran appears to be eager to negotiate with the US and Israel in order to end the ongoing war. This suggests a diplomatic approach from Iran, signaling a willingness to engage in dialogue to resolve conflicts peacefully. However, the CNN headline presents a different perspective, stating that Iran refuses to negotiate while under attack and insists on completing its retaliation against Israel first. This portrayal of Iran as unwilling to negotiate under current circumstances implies a more aggressive stance.

Greenwald’s tweet emphasizes the role of disinformation as a weapon of war, highlighting how different narratives can shape public perception and influence opinions. The tweet suggests that conflicting reports from news sources can lead to confusion and manipulation, allowing individuals to believe what they want based on the information presented to them.

In a world where information is readily accessible and constantly evolving, the spread of misinformation and propaganda can have significant consequences in shaping international relations and public opinion. The tweet serves as a reminder to critically evaluate the sources of information we consume and to be aware of the potential biases and agendas at play in media coverage.

Overall, Greenwald’s tweet underscores the importance of discerning truth from fiction in a world where misinformation can be used as a tool of manipulation and control. It encourages readers to question the narratives presented to them and to seek out multiple sources of information to form a more informed and balanced perspective on complex geopolitical issues.

WSJ this morning: Iran eager to negotiate with the US and Israel to end the war.

CNN this morning: Iran refuses to negotiate while under attack and until its retaliation against Israel is completed.

Disinformation is always a weapon of war: lets people believe what they want: pic.twitter.com/otpHfITbFe

— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) June 16, 2025

In recent news, conflicting reports have emerged regarding Iran’s stance on negotiations with the United States and Israel to end the ongoing war. According to the Wall Street Journal, Iran has expressed eagerness to engage in talks and find a peaceful resolution to the conflict. On the other hand, CNN has reported that Iran is refusing to negotiate while under attack and is waiting to complete its retaliation against Israel before considering any discussions.

The stark contrast between these two reports highlights the prevalence of disinformation as a weapon of war. In times of conflict, misinformation and propaganda are often used to shape public opinion and further political agendas. It is crucial for the public to be vigilant and discerning when consuming news and information, especially during times of heightened tensions and conflict.

The Wall Street Journal’s report suggests that Iran is open to dialogue and is willing to engage in negotiations with the US and Israel. This could potentially signal a positive step towards de-escalating the conflict and finding a peaceful resolution. Diplomacy and communication are essential tools in resolving conflicts and preventing further escalation of violence.

On the other hand, CNN’s report paints a different picture, indicating that Iran is not willing to negotiate while under attack and is focused on retaliating against Israel. This stance reflects the complexities and challenges involved in diplomatic efforts during times of conflict. It underscores the importance of addressing underlying grievances and finding common ground to move towards peace.

In the age of digital media and social networking, it is easier than ever for misinformation to spread rapidly and influence public opinion. It is essential for individuals to critically evaluate the sources of information they consume and verify the accuracy of news reports before forming opinions or taking action.

As journalist Glenn Greenwald aptly pointed out in a tweet, disinformation is indeed a weapon of war that allows people to believe what they want. It is crucial for the public to remain vigilant, seek out reliable sources of information, and engage in critical thinking to combat the spread of misinformation and propaganda.

In conclusion, the conflicting reports regarding Iran’s stance on negotiations with the US and Israel highlight the importance of critical thinking and discernment when consuming news and information. In times of conflict, disinformation can be a powerful tool used to manipulate public opinion and shape narratives. It is essential for individuals to stay informed, question sources of information, and strive for a deeper understanding of complex geopolitical issues.