“US Enlists Israel as Attack Dog for Regime Change, Shielding trump from war Consequences: Fueling Bloodshed”
US-Israel alliance, regime change strategy, war machine fuel
—————–

In a tweet by journalist Abby Martin, she argues that the United States uses Israel as a “lunatic attack dog” for regime change, supplying them with weapons and intelligence while shielding them from consequences. She goes on to claim that the US war machine is fueling bloodshed across the globe. This provocative statement sheds light on the complex relationship between the US and Israel, raising questions about America’s role in global conflicts.

The tweet suggests that the US is not directly involved in wars but instead relies on Israel to carry out its military operations. By supplying weapons and intelligence to Israel, the US is able to exert influence and control over international affairs without directly engaging in conflict. This strategy allows the US to maintain a level of plausible deniability while still achieving its foreign policy objectives.

Furthermore, Martin asserts that the US shields Israel from the consequences of its actions, allowing the country to operate with impunity on the world stage. This raises concerns about accountability and the ethical implications of using allies to carry out military operations on behalf of the US. By enabling Israel to act as a “lunatic attack dog,” the US may be contributing to the perpetuation of violence and instability in various regions.

The tweet also highlights the role of the US war machine in perpetuating bloodshed around the world. By supplying weapons and military support to allies like Israel, the US is directly contributing to conflicts and humanitarian crises in different parts of the globe. This raises important questions about the morality and ethics of America’s foreign policy decisions and the impact they have on innocent civilians caught in the crossfire.

Overall, Abby Martin’s tweet serves as a stark reminder of the complex dynamics at play in international relations. It challenges the narrative that the US is a reluctant participant in wars, instead suggesting that the country actively facilitates and enables military actions through its allies. This thought-provoking statement encourages readers to critically examine America’s role in global conflicts and consider the broader implications of its foreign policy decisions.

Trump wasn’t dragged into war. The US uses Israel as its lunatic attack dog for regime change. It supplies their weapons and intel then shields them from consequences. The US war machine is the engine fueling the bloodshed https://t.co/05dmz94CyF

— Abby Martin (@AbbyMartin) June 15, 2025

In today’s complex geopolitical landscape, the relationship between the United States and Israel has often been a subject of intense scrutiny and debate. Recent tweets by journalist Abby Martin have sparked conversations about the role of Israel as a key player in US foreign policy decisions. According to Martin, the US uses Israel as a "lunatic attack dog" for regime change, supplying weapons, intelligence, and shielding them from consequences. This assertion raises important questions about the dynamics of power and influence in global conflicts.

The Strategic Alliance Between the US and Israel

The United States and Israel have maintained a strong strategic alliance for decades, rooted in shared values and common interests. This partnership has led to extensive military cooperation, with the US providing significant military aid and support to Israel. As a result, Israel has become a key player in the region, wielding significant influence and power.

Israel as a Proxy for US Foreign Policy Goals

One of the key arguments put forth by Martin is that the US uses Israel as a proxy in its pursuit of foreign policy goals, particularly when it comes to regime change. By arming and supporting Israel, the US is able to exert influence in the Middle East without directly involving itself in conflicts. This allows the US to pursue its strategic objectives while maintaining a degree of plausible deniability.

The Role of Israel in Middle East Conflicts

Israel’s role in Middle East conflicts has been a subject of controversy and debate. Critics argue that Israel’s actions have often exacerbated tensions in the region, leading to increased violence and instability. By supplying weapons and intelligence to Israel, the US is seen as complicit in these actions, further fueling the cycle of violence and bloodshed.

Implications for Global Security

The close relationship between the US and Israel has far-reaching implications for global security and stability. By using Israel as a proxy for its foreign policy goals, the US risks escalating conflicts and exacerbating tensions in the region. This approach also raises questions about the moral and ethical implications of using another country as a tool for achieving strategic objectives.

The Need for Transparency and Accountability

In light of these revelations, there is a growing call for greater transparency and accountability in US foreign policy decisions. Critics argue that the US must be more open about its relationships with other countries, particularly when it comes to military aid and support. By shining a light on these issues, we can begin to have a more informed and nuanced discussion about the role of the US in global conflicts.

In conclusion, the tweets by Abby Martin have sparked important conversations about the relationship between the US and Israel and the implications for global security. By using Israel as a "lunatic attack dog" for regime change, the US risks escalating conflicts and fueling the cycle of violence in the region. It is essential that we continue to examine and question the dynamics of power and influence in global politics, in order to work towards a more peaceful and stable world.