Newsom Slams Military Parade as “Vulgar Display” of Weakness—Is He Right?
military display criticism, authoritarian leadership symbolism, public perception of military parades
—————–

Overview of Governor Gavin Newsom’s Critique on U.S. Military Parades

In a recent statement, California Governor Gavin Newsom expressed strong disapproval of military parades in the United States, deeming them a "vulgar display." His comments resonate with a broader discourse around the implications of such displays of military might, especially when compared to similar events in authoritarian regimes. This summary explores the context of Newsom’s remarks, the historical significance of military parades, and the implications of his critique on American society and politics.

The Context of Newsom’s Remarks

On June 13, 2025, Newsom took to Twitter to articulate his views on military parades, suggesting that they are emblematic of weakness rather than strength. By drawing a parallel between the United States and "dictators around the world," he underscores a concern that such displays may reflect a fragility in a nation’s governance rather than its stability. His comments come at a time when the political landscape in the U.S. is increasingly polarized, raising questions about national identity and the role of the military in American life.

Historical Significance of Military Parades

Military parades have long been a tradition in various countries, often used as a tool for political propaganda and national pride. In authoritarian regimes, such as North Korea and Russia, these events often showcase military capabilities and serve to reinforce the power of the ruling government. In contrast, democratic nations like the United States have historically approached military displays with caution, aiming to balance national pride with the values of freedom and democracy.

The tradition of military parades in the U.S. can be traced back to the early 20th century, with notable events like the Victory Way parade in 1919, celebrating World war I veterans. However, the perception of these parades has evolved, particularly in the wake of discussions about militarism and its implications for democracy.

Newsom’s Perspective on Militarism and Democracy

Newsom’s critique of military parades taps into a broader concern regarding the relationship between militarism and democratic values. He suggests that a strong democracy should not rely on displays of military might to assert its strength. Instead, he advocates for a focus on civic engagement, community building, and the promotion of social justice as more effective measures of national strength.

His assertion that military parades are a "vulgar display" reflects a sentiment held by many who believe that such events can detract from the core values of democracy, including equality and participation. By highlighting the weakness associated with authoritarian displays of power, Newsom echoes a growing call among progressive leaders to reassess the role of the military in American society.

The Public’s Reaction and Ongoing Debate

Newsom’s comments have sparked a wide array of reactions from the public and political commentators. Supporters of his stance argue that military parades are an outdated practice that does not resonate with the contemporary values of inclusivity and equality. They suggest that resources allocated for such events could be better used to address pressing social issues like education, healthcare, and infrastructure.

Conversely, critics of Newsom’s perspective argue that military parades can serve as a unifying event for communities and a way to honor veterans and active service members. They contend that these displays foster national pride and remind citizens of the sacrifices made by those in uniform.

The debate surrounding military parades and their significance is likely to continue, particularly as the U.S. grapples with its identity on the global stage. Newsom’s remarks contribute to an ongoing dialogue about how the nation chooses to represent itself, both domestically and internationally.

The Implications for Future Military Displays

As discussions about military parades persist, policymakers may need to consider the implications of such events on national unity and public perception. Newsom’s comments may influence future decisions regarding military displays, prompting a reevaluation of their format and purpose.

One potential outcome could be a shift towards more community-oriented events that celebrate service members without the grandiosity traditionally associated with military parades. This could involve local celebrations, parades that incorporate civic engagement, or events that focus on education about the military’s role in society.

Conclusion

Governor Gavin Newsom’s critique of U.S. military parades highlights a significant tension in American society regarding the display of military power and its implications for democratic values. While military parades have historically served as a means of national pride and cohesion, the evolving discourse surrounding these events calls for a reevaluation of their role in contemporary America.

As discussions continue, it is crucial for citizens and leaders alike to engage in meaningful dialogue about what it means to honor military service while upholding the principles of democracy and equality. Ultimately, Newsom’s remarks serve as a catalyst for broader conversations about the future of military displays in the United States and their alignment with the nation’s core values.

NEWSOM ON U.S. MILITARY PARADE: “It’s a vulgar display.”

“You see it with dictators around the world that are weak.” pic.twitter.com/w5Jin9rRhi

— Breaking911 (@Breaking911) June 13, 2025

NEWSOM ON U.S. MILITARY PARADE: “It’s a vulgar display.”

When you think about military parades, what comes to mind? Grand displays of power? A celebration of patriotism? Or perhaps a more critical view, one that sees them as a “vulgar display,” as California Governor Gavin Newsom recently remarked? His comments stirred quite the conversation, especially when he drew parallels between such parades and those seen in authoritarian regimes. Let’s dive into what he meant, why it matters, and how military parades are perceived both domestically and globally.

“You see it with dictators around the world that are weak.”

Newsom’s assertion that military parades are often a show of weakness rather than strength opens up a fascinating dialogue. It’s easy to picture grand parades in countries like North Korea or Russia, where the spectacle serves to reinforce the government’s image and distract from underlying issues. In those contexts, the display of military might often masks significant societal problems—economic instability, human rights violations, and more. Newsom’s comment suggests that when states rely on such displays, it signals insecurity and a need for external validation.

But here in the United States, the conversation takes on different layers. Military parades have been part of American tradition, especially during significant national celebrations or after major victories. Yet, the question remains: do these parades serve the purpose of honoring our troops, or do they risk becoming a show of force that could alienate more than it unites?

The Historical Context of Military Parades

Understanding military parades requires a look back at history. The roots of military parades stretch deep into the past, with various cultures using them to showcase military prowess and unity. For instance, the Roman Empire famously used parades to celebrate military victories, flaunting their strength and reinforcing the emperor’s power. Similarly, the French Revolution saw the emergence of military parades as a means of national pride and identity.

Fast forward to the 20th century, and the narrative shifts. Post World War II, many nations adopted military parades as a way to boost morale and symbolize national unity. In the U.S., such displays often coincide with Independence Day celebrations or Veteran’s Day, aiming to honor those who serve. However, the line between celebration and spectacle can sometimes blur, leading to the kind of critiques Newsom offers.

The Modern Debate on Military Displays

In recent years, the debate surrounding military parades has intensified. Critics argue that they glorify militarism and divert attention from pressing social issues such as healthcare, education, and poverty. In a world where many Americans feel disconnected from their government, a flashy parade might be perceived as a distraction from the real challenges facing the nation.

Supporters, however, contend that these events can foster a sense of national pride and appreciation for the sacrifices made by service members. They argue that a well-executed parade can provide a venue for communities to come together and celebrate their shared values. Yet, Newsom’s comments prompt us to question whether the display of military might is necessary or appropriate in a democratic society.

Public Perception of Military Parades

Public sentiment surrounding military parades is complex and often polarized. Some Americans see these events as essential for honoring the military, while others view them as an unnecessary spectacle. A [Pew Research Center survey](https://www.pewresearch.org) found that opinions on military spending and displays vary widely, influenced by factors like age, political affiliation, and personal experiences with the military.

Younger generations, in particular, tend to view military displays with skepticism, often associating them with nationalism and militarism. They might see the resources spent on parades as better allocated towards social programs or addressing climate change. This generational divide is crucial as the U.S. navigates its identity on the global stage.

Global Perspectives on Military Parades

Take a look around the globe, and you’ll find that military parades are a common occurrence, often tied to national pride. Countries such as Russia and China showcase their military capabilities during large-scale parades, signaling strength and unity. However, these displays often come with a heavy dose of propaganda, aiming to bolster the regime’s image and quash dissent.

In contrast, nations like Canada and Australia incorporate military elements into their national celebrations but tend to focus more on honoring veterans rather than showcasing military might. This difference in approach raises the question: what do we want to communicate through such displays? Are they a celebration of freedom, or do they risk becoming a tool for political gain?

The Role of Leadership in Shaping the Narrative

Leaders play a pivotal role in shaping the narrative surrounding military parades. Newsom’s comments reflect a growing trend among progressive politicians who advocate for a re-evaluation of how we celebrate military service. His perspective invites a deeper discussion about the values we prioritize as a nation.

When leaders like Newsom challenge the status quo, it opens up space for citizens to rethink their relationship with the military. This dialogue is essential for fostering a more nuanced understanding of what it means to honor those who serve without resorting to displays that might alienate portions of the population.

The Future of Military Parades in America

As we look ahead, the future of military parades in America remains uncertain. Will we continue to embrace them as symbols of national pride, or will we heed voices like Newsom’s and move toward more inclusive forms of recognition? The challenge lies in finding a balance between honoring service members and fostering a sense of unity that resonates with all Americans.

In a world increasingly characterized by division, the way we choose to celebrate our military may play a critical role in shaping our national identity. Rather than viewing military parades as a necessary tradition, perhaps it’s time to consider alternative ways to honor our heroes—ways that reflect our evolving values and aspirations as a nation.

Conclusion

In the end, Newsom’s provocative statement about military parades serves as a catalyst for broader discussions about power, identity, and national values. It compels us to consider not only how we honor our troops but also what those displays say about us as a society. As we navigate these complex issues, let’s keep the conversation going, engaging with diverse perspectives and challenging ourselves to think critically about the role of military displays in a democracy.