Israel’s Double Standard: Precision Bombing in Tehran vs. Devastation in Gaza
Gaza destruction, civilian casualties, Israeli military tactics in 2025
—————–

The tweet by Muhammad Shehada highlights the stark contrast in Israel’s military tactics when it comes to targeting individuals in different regions. The tweet compares Israel’s ability to surgically bomb a specific apartment in Tehran to kill a top general without collapsing the whole building, with its approach in Gaza, where they carpet bomb and annihilate a whole neighborhood to “target” a rank and file member.

The tweet suggests that in Gaza, the destruction of the neighborhood is the goal, while targeting a specific individual is merely a pretext. This stark difference in tactics raises questions about Israel’s military strategy and the impact it has on civilian populations in conflict zones.

The tweet also brings attention to the disproportionate use of force by Israel in different regions, highlighting the devastating consequences for innocent civilians caught in the crossfire. The image attached to the tweet shows the destruction caused by Israel’s military actions in Gaza, further emphasizing the human cost of such tactics.

Overall, Muhammad Shehada’s tweet sheds light on the complexities of military operations in conflict zones and raises important ethical considerations regarding the use of force and the protection of civilian lives. The tweet serves as a reminder of the devastating impact of war on civilian populations and calls for a reevaluation of military tactics to minimize harm to innocent lives.

Israel can surgically bomb a specific apartment in Tehran to kill a top general without collapsing the whole building

But in Gaza, they carpet bomb & annihilate a whole neighbourhood to “target” a rank & file member (the destruction is the goal, the “target” is the pretext) pic.twitter.com/0jkZLskdVA

— Muhammad Shehada (@muhammadshehad2) June 13, 2025

In a recent tweet by Muhammad Shehada, a stark comparison was drawn between Israeli military tactics in different regions, highlighting a concerning discrepancy in their approach to targeting individuals. The tweet pointed out that Israel has the capability to surgically bomb a specific apartment in Tehran to eliminate a top general without causing the collapse of the entire building. However, in Gaza, they resort to carpet bombing and annihilating entire neighborhoods in order to target a rank and file member. This stark contrast in tactics raises questions about the underlying motivations and justifications for such actions.

Israel’s Surgical Strikes in Tehran

The ability of Israel to conduct precise, surgical strikes in Tehran demonstrates a high level of military sophistication and technology. By targeting a specific apartment to eliminate a top general, they are able to minimize collateral damage and destruction to the surrounding area. This precision in targeting allows them to achieve their military objectives with minimal impact on civilians and infrastructure. The ability to carry out such targeted strikes requires advanced intelligence gathering, surveillance, and precision-guided munitions.

Gaza’s Devastating Approach

On the other hand, the tweet points out that in Gaza, Israel’s military tactics involve carpet bombing and annihilating entire neighborhoods in order to target a single individual. This indiscriminate approach results in widespread destruction, loss of life, and displacement of civilians. The destruction caused by these tactics serves as the primary goal, with the targeted individual being used as a pretext for carrying out such devastating attacks. The disproportionate use of force in Gaza raises concerns about violations of international humanitarian law and human rights.

Motivations and Justifications

The stark difference in Israel’s military tactics in different regions raises questions about the underlying motivations and justifications for their actions. The ability to conduct surgical strikes in Tehran suggests a focus on achieving specific military objectives with minimal collateral damage. However, the indiscriminate use of force in Gaza raises concerns about the broader strategic goals and intentions behind such devastating attacks. The destruction of entire neighborhoods in Gaza raises questions about the proportionality, necessity, and legitimacy of Israel’s military actions in the region.

Implications for International Relations

The contrasting approaches of Israel in different regions have significant implications for international relations and perceptions of Israel’s military actions. The use of surgical strikes in Tehran may be viewed as a demonstration of Israel’s military capabilities and restraint in targeting specific individuals. On the other hand, the indiscriminate use of force in Gaza may lead to condemnation and calls for accountability from the international community. The disparity in Israel’s military tactics may also impact diplomatic relations and perceptions of Israel’s commitment to upholding international law and human rights standards.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the tweet by Muhammad Shehada highlights a concerning contrast in Israel’s military tactics in different regions, raising questions about the underlying motivations and justifications for their actions. The ability to conduct surgical strikes in Tehran demonstrates a high level of military sophistication and precision, while the indiscriminate use of force in Gaza raises concerns about violations of international humanitarian law. The implications of these contrasting approaches for international relations and perceptions of Israel’s military actions are significant and warrant further scrutiny and attention.