Judge Boasberg assigned to four major trump cases raises eyebrows and suspicions
Judge James Boasberg, Trump cases, judicial assignment
Statistical bias, court system, rigged
Legal proceedings, high-profile trials, 2025 calendar
—————–

In a shocking revelation, Senator Eric Schmitt recently took to Twitter to express his concerns about Judge James Boasberg being assigned to four major Trump cases. He described this as a statistical impossibility and insinuated that it wasn’t a random occurrence, but rather a rigged situation.

The tweet quickly gained traction, with many people questioning the fairness and impartiality of the judicial system. How could one judge be assigned to so many high-profile cases involving the former president? Is there something more sinister at play here?

Judge James Boasberg, a federal judge in the District of Columbia, has a reputation for being fair and impartial. However, the sheer number of Trump cases he has been assigned to has raised eyebrows. It’s not uncommon for judges to handle multiple cases involving the same parties, but four major cases involving a former president is highly unusual.

The implications of this situation are serious. If Judge Boasberg is indeed being strategically assigned to these cases, it calls into question the integrity of the judicial system. The idea that justice is not blind, but rather influenced by external forces, is deeply troubling.

Senator Schmitt’s tweet has sparked a debate about the importance of judicial independence and the need for transparency in the assignment of cases. The public has a right to know that their cases are being heard by judges who are unbiased and free from outside influence.

As the story continues to unfold, it will be interesting to see how Judge Boasberg and the legal community respond to these allegations. Will there be an investigation into the assignment of cases? Will there be calls for greater oversight and accountability in the judicial system?

One thing is clear: the issue of judicial integrity is a critical one that deserves attention. The public must have confidence that their cases are being heard fairly and impartially, without any hint of impropriety. Only time will tell how this situation will be resolved, but one thing is certain: the spotlight is now firmly on Judge James Boasberg and the cases he is presiding over.

Judge James Boasberg has somehow been assigned FOUR major Trump cases.

A statistical impossibility.

That isn’t “random.” It’s rigged. pic.twitter.com/wHpj6XqjUF

— Senator Eric Schmitt (@SenEricSchmitt) June 3, 2025

In recent news, it has come to light that Judge James Boasberg has been assigned to preside over not just one, not two, but a total of FOUR major Trump cases. Yes, you read that correctly – four cases involving the former President of the United States. This development has raised eyebrows and sparked controversy, with many questioning the likelihood of such a statistical anomaly occurring by mere chance.

### Judge James Boasberg: The man of the Hour

Judge James Boasberg, a federal judge serving on the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, finds himself at the center of attention due to these high-profile cases. His name has become synonymous with controversy and speculation, as people wonder how one individual could end up with such a significant caseload involving a single political figure.

### A Statistical Impossibility

The chances of one judge being randomly assigned to preside over four major cases involving the same individual are incredibly slim. In fact, it can be considered a statistical impossibility. The odds of this happening by chance are so minuscule that it begs the question of whether there is something more at play here.

### Questioning the Randomness

When it comes to the assignment of judges to cases, the process is typically random to ensure fairness and impartiality. However, in this particular situation, the repeated assignment of Judge James Boasberg to Trump-related cases raises doubts about the randomness of the selection process. Many are beginning to question whether there is a hidden agenda or manipulation at work behind the scenes.

### It’s Rigged

The word “rigged” has been thrown around in relation to these assignments, suggesting that there may be some form of manipulation or bias influencing the selection of Judge Boasberg for these cases. The notion that it isn’t just a random occurrence but a deliberate action to ensure a specific outcome has sparked outrage and demands for transparency in the judicial system.

### The Impact of Such Assignments

The repeated assignment of Judge James Boasberg to Trump cases has far-reaching implications. It not only calls into question the fairness and impartiality of the judiciary but also undermines public trust in the legal system as a whole. When cases of such magnitude are handled by the same judge repeatedly, it raises concerns about the potential for bias and influence in the outcome.

### Seeking Answers

In light of these developments, many are calling for a thorough investigation into the process of judge assignments. Transparency and accountability are crucial in maintaining the integrity of the judicial system and ensuring that justice is served without prejudice or favoritism. The public deserves answers and reassurance that the legal process is free from manipulation or external influence.

### Moving Forward

As the controversy surrounding the assignment of Judge James Boasberg to Trump cases continues to unfold, it is essential to remain vigilant and demand accountability from those in positions of power. The integrity of the judiciary is paramount to upholding the rule of law and ensuring that justice is blind. By shedding light on questionable practices and seeking transparency, we can strive towards a legal system that is fair, impartial, and free from manipulation.

In conclusion, the repeated assignment of Judge James Boasberg to four major Trump cases is not just a random occurrence but a potential indication of a rigged system. The statistical impossibility of such a scenario occurring by chance raises serious concerns about the fairness and impartiality of the judiciary. It is imperative that we demand transparency, accountability, and answers to ensure that justice is served without bias or manipulation. The integrity of the legal system hangs in the balance, and it is up to us to ensure that it remains untarnished.