Piers Morgan confronts Israeli official, signaling global shift in opinion on Gaza; “blood libel” claim loses impact.
Piers Morgan Israel criticism, global opinion shift, blood libel impact 2025
—————–

In a surprising turn of events, Piers Morgan, known for justifying Israel’s actions in Gaza for months, is now treating an Israeli official in a different light. This shift in behavior highlights a significant change in global opinion towards Israel.

It seems that the fear that once accompanied Israel’s accusations of “blood libel” has dissipated. The phrase no longer carries the same weight it once did, as it has been overused and lost its power to instill fear.

This tweet from Glenn Greenwald points to a larger trend in which Israel’s actions are being scrutinized more closely and with less deference. Morgan’s treatment of the Israeli official is indicative of this shift, as he is no longer blindly accepting of Israel’s justifications for its actions.

The fact that someone like Piers Morgan, who has historically supported Israel’s actions, is now questioning them is a sign that public opinion is changing. This shift in perspective could have far-reaching implications for Israel’s standing on the global stage.

It is clear that Israel’s once ironclad defense of its actions is no longer as effective as it once was. The repetition of phrases like “blood libel” has diminished their impact, and people are no longer as easily swayed by them.

Overall, this tweet from Glenn Greenwald highlights a growing skepticism towards Israel’s actions and rhetoric. The changing attitudes towards Israel could have significant implications for its relationships with other countries and its standing in the international community.

That Piers Morgan of all people — who justified Israel’s destruction of Gaza for months — is treating an Israeli official this way shows the massive sea change in global opinion.

And: nobody is petrified now when Israel screams “blood libel!” It lost its sting from overuse: https://t.co/Yqg4CG56mB

— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) May 28, 2025

In recent years, the global opinion regarding Israel and its actions in Gaza has undergone a significant shift. Piers Morgan, a prominent media figure who previously justified Israel’s destruction of Gaza for months, is now being called out for his treatment of an Israeli official. This change in attitude signifies a massive sea change in how the world perceives Israel’s actions in the region. The days of people being petrified when Israel cries “blood libel” are seemingly over, as this once-powerful accusation has lost its impact due to overuse.

This shift in global opinion can be attributed to a variety of factors. One key factor is the rise of social media and citizen journalism, which has allowed for the dissemination of information and perspectives that were previously marginalized or suppressed. Individuals like Glenn Greenwald have used platforms like Twitter to challenge mainstream narratives and provide alternative viewpoints on issues like the Israel-Gaza conflict.

Furthermore, the growing awareness of human rights abuses in Gaza has had a profound impact on public opinion. Reports from organizations like Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch have documented the disproportionate use of force by Israel in the region, leading to widespread condemnation and calls for accountability. As more people become aware of the suffering of the Palestinian people, support for Israel’s actions has waned.

Another significant factor in the changing global opinion on Israel is the increasing polarization of politics and media. Traditional allies of Israel are now facing internal pressure to reconsider their support in light of human rights violations and international law violations. This has created a more nuanced and critical approach to Israel’s actions, with many questioning the legitimacy of its policies and practices.

In the face of these shifting attitudes, Israel’s use of terms like “blood libel” to deflect criticism has become less effective. Once a powerful accusation used to silence dissent, the term has lost its sting as more people recognize it as a tactic to avoid accountability. By overusing such inflammatory language, Israel has inadvertently undermined its own credibility and legitimacy in the eyes of the international community.

As we move forward, it is crucial for individuals and governments to continue to speak out against human rights abuses and violations of international law in Gaza and other conflict zones. By holding all parties accountable for their actions and supporting efforts to promote peace and justice, we can work towards a more just and equitable world for all.

Sources:
– Glenn Greenwald’s Twitter: https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/1927852456072868229?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
– Amnesty International: https://www.amnesty.org/en/countries/middle-east-and-north-africa/israel-and-occupied-palestinian-territories/report-israel-and-occupied-palestinian-territories/
– Human Rights Watch: https://www.hrw.org/middle-east/n-africa/israel/palestine