In a recent exclusive report, it was revealed that Judge Myong Joun, a Korean-born federal judge appointed by President Biden, has a transgender son who identifies as a girl. This revelation comes in the midst of a controversial decision by Judge Joun to block President trump‘s efforts to shut down the Department of Education over Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) and LGBTQ agendas in public schools.

The news was first shared by conservative journalist Laura Loomer on Twitter, where she highlighted the irony of Judge Joun’s decision given his personal connection to the LGBTQ community. The tweet included a link to an article with more details about Judge Joun and his transgender son.

This story has sparked a heated debate on social media, with some praising Judge Joun for his support of LGBTQ rights and others criticizing him for what they see as a conflict of interest. Some have questioned whether Judge Joun’s personal beliefs and experiences should influence his decisions on the bench, while others argue that his empathy and understanding of the LGBTQ community make him a more compassionate and just judge.

Regardless of where one stands on this issue, it is clear that Judge Joun’s decision has significant implications for the future of DEI and LGBTQ initiatives in public schools. With his ruling, he has effectively protected these programs from being dismantled by the Trump administration, ensuring that LGBTQ students and their allies will continue to have support and representation in the education system.

As the story continues to unfold, it will be interesting to see how Judge Joun’s personal life and beliefs impact his career as a federal judge. Will he continue to advocate for LGBTQ rights from the bench, or will he face backlash for his perceived bias? Only time will tell, but one thing is certain: Judge Joun’s decision has brought attention to the intersection of personal identity and professional responsibility in the courtroom.

EXCLUSIVE:

Judge Myong Joun, the Korean Born, Biden-appointed federal judge who just blocked President Trump from shutting down the Department of Education over DEI and LGBTQ agendas in public schools has a Trans son who thinks he’s a girl!

The trans son is named… https://t.co/LuBmJbULPh pic.twitter.com/i29Gqkfrzv

— Laura Loomer (@LauraLoomer) May 22, 2025

In a recent exclusive report, it was revealed that Judge Myong Joun, a Korean-born federal judge appointed by President Biden, made a significant ruling that blocked President Trump’s attempt to shut down the Department of Education over Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) and LGBTQ agendas in public schools. This decision has sparked controversy and raised questions about the judge’s personal life, specifically regarding his transgender son.

The judge’s transgender son, who identifies as a girl, has become a focal point of discussion surrounding Judge Joun’s impartiality in making legal decisions. The revelation of his son’s gender identity has added a layer of complexity to the ongoing debate around LGBTQ rights and representation in the legal system.

The news of Judge Joun’s transgender son has ignited a debate about the intersection of personal identity and professional responsibilities. Some argue that a judge’s personal life should not impact their ability to make fair and just rulings, while others believe that such personal connections can influence their decisions on specific issues.

The controversy surrounding Judge Joun and his transgender son highlights the broader discussion about LGBTQ rights and acceptance in society. As more individuals come out as LGBTQ, it is essential to consider how their identities may impact their relationships, careers, and public perceptions.

In light of these developments, it is crucial to approach the topic of LGBTQ rights with empathy, understanding, and respect for individuals’ personal experiences. It is essential to recognize the importance of inclusivity and diversity in shaping a more equitable and just society for all.

As we continue to navigate complex issues surrounding LGBTQ rights and representation, it is essential to engage in constructive dialogue, listen to diverse perspectives, and work towards creating a more inclusive and accepting society for everyone.

In conclusion, Judge Myong Joun’s transgender son has brought attention to the intersection of personal identity and professional responsibilities in the legal system. This revelation underscores the ongoing debate around LGBTQ rights, acceptance, and representation in society. As we move forward, it is crucial to approach these issues with empathy, understanding, and a commitment to creating a more inclusive and equitable world for all individuals, regardless of their gender identity.