The tweet above raises concerns about the number of flu cases reported by the CDC over the years, implying that there may be some foul play or misinformation at play. The numbers presented in the tweet show a significant drop in the number of confirmed flu cases in the 2020-2021 season, followed by a sudden increase in the 2021-2022 season. This drastic fluctuation in numbers has led the author to label the situation as a “scam” and call for accountability in the form of people going to prison.

Although the tweet does not provide any further context or evidence to support these claims, it does prompt a closer look at the data provided by the CDC and the factors that may contribute to the fluctuations in reported flu cases. It is important to note that the CDC collects data on flu cases through surveillance systems that monitor flu activity in the United States, including the number of cases, hospitalizations, and deaths attributed to the flu.

One potential explanation for the sharp decrease in confirmed flu cases during the 2020-2021 season could be the implementation of COVID-19 safety measures such as mask-wearing, social distancing, and increased hand hygiene. These measures not only helped prevent the spread of COVID-19 but also contributed to a decrease in the transmission of other respiratory illnesses like the flu. It is also possible that some cases of the flu were misdiagnosed as COVID-19 due to the similarity in symptoms, leading to a lower number of reported flu cases.

On the other hand, the sudden increase in confirmed flu cases in the 2021-2022 season could be attributed to a relaxation of COVID-19 safety measures, resulting in a resurgence of flu activity. The flu virus is known to mutate rapidly, leading to different strains circulating each year, which can impact the effectiveness of the flu vaccine and contribute to fluctuations in the number of reported cases.

While it is important to critically analyze and question the data provided by public health agencies like the CDC, it is essential to do so with a balanced and evidence-based approach. Without further information or context, it is premature to label the fluctuations in reported flu cases as a “scam” or call for people to go to prison. It is crucial to consider all factors that may influence the data, including changes in testing practices, surveillance methods, public health interventions, and viral dynamics.

In conclusion, the tweet highlights the need for transparency, accountability, and critical thinking when interpreting public health data. While the fluctuations in reported flu cases may raise eyebrows, it is essential to dig deeper into the underlying factors and seek out credible sources to gain a comprehensive understanding of the situation. As we navigate through future flu seasons and public health challenges, it is crucial to approach data analysis with a nuanced perspective and a commitment to promoting health and well-being for all.

The number of Flu cases per year confirmed by the CDC.

Anything look odd to you?

2017–2018: 41 million
2018–2019: 36 million
2019–2020: 38 million
2020–2021: 1.8 million
2021–2022: 9 million
2022–2023: 31 million
2023–2024: 40 million

What a scam.

People need to go to prison.

— C3 (@C_3C_3) May 23, 2025

When you take a look at the numbers of flu cases per year confirmed by the CDC, do you notice anything peculiar? The figures from the years 2017 to 2024 seem to follow a consistent pattern, with millions of cases reported each year. However, things take a drastic turn in the year 2020-2021 when the number drops significantly to 1.8 million. This sudden decrease raises eyebrows and prompts questions about the validity of the data provided by the CDC.

The Center for Disease Control and Prevention is a trusted source for health information in the United States, responsible for tracking and monitoring various illnesses, including the flu. With such an important role in public health, it is crucial that the data they provide is accurate and reliable. However, the sharp decline in flu cases in 2020-2021 seems alarming and begs the question: what is the reasoning behind this dramatic decrease?

Some skeptics have pointed out that the drop in reported flu cases in 2020-2021 may be attributed to the COVID-19 pandemic. The widespread adoption of preventive measures such as mask-wearing, social distancing, and increased hand hygiene may have inadvertently led to a reduction in the transmission of the flu virus. Additionally, the focus on COVID-19 testing and vaccination efforts may have overshadowed the surveillance and reporting of flu cases during that period.

As we move into the years 2021-2024, the number of confirmed flu cases starts to rise again, reaching levels similar to those seen in previous years. This uptick in cases raises concerns about the accuracy of the data and highlights the importance of transparency and accountability in public health reporting. It is essential for organizations like the CDC to provide clear explanations for fluctuations in data and to address any discrepancies that may arise.

The tweet in question calls the reported numbers a “scam” and suggests that individuals should be held accountable for what is perceived as misleading information. While it is important to scrutinize data and hold institutions accountable for their actions, it is also crucial to approach such claims with a critical mindset and seek out evidence to support any allegations of wrongdoing. The integrity of public health data is paramount, and any discrepancies should be thoroughly investigated to ensure the trust and confidence of the public.

In conclusion, the fluctuating numbers of flu cases reported by the CDC over the years raise important questions about the accuracy and reliability of public health data. While the drop in cases in 2020-2021 may be attributed to various factors, it is essential for organizations like the CDC to provide transparent and consistent reporting to maintain the trust of the public. It is up to us as individuals to stay informed, ask questions, and hold institutions accountable for the information they provide. Let’s continue to advocate for transparency and accuracy in public health reporting to ensure the well-being of our communities.