In a recent tweet, Ben Kesslen congratulated the University of Maryland for successfully selecting a commencement speaker who is unlikely to face protest during the graduation ceremony. This tweet highlights a growing trend in university events and the challenges associated with choosing speakers in today’s polarized climate. As universities continue to navigate political sensitivities and differing viewpoints, the choice of commencement speakers becomes increasingly complex.

### The Importance of Commencement Speakers

Commencement ceremonies are significant milestones in a student’s academic journey. They not only mark the culmination of years of hard work but also set the tone for graduates as they embark on their next chapters. The choice of speaker can greatly influence the atmosphere of the event and the messages conveyed to graduates and their families.

### Navigating Political Sensitivities

In recent years, many universities have faced backlash over their selections for commencement speakers. Political figures, controversial activists, and notable public personalities have sparked protests and boycotts, leading institutions to reconsider their speaker choices. The challenge lies in balancing the desire to invite influential speakers who can inspire students with the need to create a welcoming environment for all graduates.

### The University of Maryland’s Approach

The University of Maryland’s recent decision to choose a commencement speaker without the risk of protests is a strategic move. By selecting a speaker who is perceived as neutral or non-controversial, the university aims to foster a positive and celebratory atmosphere for the graduation ceremony. This approach reflects a broader trend among institutions of higher education to prioritize community harmony over political statements.

### The Impact of Social Media

Kesslen’s tweet exemplifies the role of social media in shaping public perception around university events. With platforms like Twitter amplifying voices on both sides of the political spectrum, the implications of speaker choices extend beyond campus boundaries. Universities must now navigate the potential fallout from a single speaker choice, as online reactions can lead to widespread attention and impact public relations.

### The Balance Between Diversity of Thought and Community

One of the critical discussions surrounding commencement speakers is the balance between diversity of thought and maintaining a sense of community. While universities value the exposure to different viewpoints, they must also consider the emotional and psychological well-being of their students. A speaker who incites division or controversy can detract from the celebratory nature of graduation, leading institutions to carefully weigh their options.

### Finding Common Ground

In light of these challenges, universities are increasingly seeking speakers who can resonate with a broad audience. This often means inviting individuals who have made significant contributions to society but may not align with any particular political ideology. By focusing on universally respected figures, institutions can mitigate the risk of protests and ensure a more inclusive celebration.

### The Role of Alumni and Community

The involvement of alumni and the local community can play a pivotal role in speaker selection. Universities often consider feedback from these groups when making decisions about commencement speakers. Engaging with alumni can provide valuable insights into potential candidates who are well-regarded and unlikely to provoke dissent.

### Ensuring a Positive Experience for Graduates

Ultimately, the goal of selecting a commencement speaker is to ensure a positive experience for graduates. Ceremonies should be a time of reflection, joy, and inspiration, and the choice of speaker can significantly influence this experience. By prioritizing speakers who are unlikely to provoke controversy, universities can create an environment where graduates feel celebrated and supported.

### Conclusion

Ben Kesslen’s tweet congratulating the University of Maryland underscores the complexities surrounding the selection of commencement speakers in today’s political landscape. As universities strive to navigate these challenges, the importance of community, inclusivity, and the overall experience for graduates remains paramount. The decision to choose a speaker who won’t be protested reflects a commitment to fostering a positive atmosphere during graduation ceremonies—an essential goal for institutions aiming to celebrate their students’ achievements effectively.

In conclusion, the landscape of commencement speaker selection is evolving, with institutions like the University of Maryland leading the way in prioritizing a harmonious environment over potential controversy. As universities continue to adapt to the changing dynamics of public opinion and political discourse, the strategies they employ will play a crucial role in shaping future graduation experiences for countless students. By focusing on speakers who can resonate with a diverse audience, universities can ensure graduation remains a joyous occasion, free from the distractions of dissent and protest.

congrats to university of maryland for finding the one commnecement speaker who wont be protested https://t.co/TCqHaAmP4k

— Ben Kesslen (@benkesslen) May 21, 2025

Congrats to University of Maryland for Finding the One Commencement Speaker Who Won’t Be Protested

When it comes to university commencement ceremonies, choosing a speaker can be a tricky business. College campuses are often hotbeds of political and social activism, and the selection of a speaker can lead to protests, heated debates, and sometimes, even controversy. With that said, it was refreshing to see a tweet from Ben Kesslen congratulating the University of Maryland for finding a commencement speaker who will not be protested. This is no small feat, and it raises some interesting questions about what makes a commencement speaker palatable to a diverse audience.

The Challenge of Choosing a Commencement Speaker

Selecting a commencement speaker is more than just picking someone famous or influential. It’s about finding an individual who can resonate with students, faculty, and families while also reflecting the values of the institution. Over the years, many universities have faced backlash for their choices, whether it was due to political affiliations, past actions, or controversial statements. This can lead to protests that overshadow the celebratory nature of graduation.

Universities like the University of Maryland often have to navigate these waters carefully. The goal is to inspire graduates while avoiding potential controversies that could lead to protests. So, when Kesslen tweeted, “Congrats to University of Maryland for finding the one commencement speaker who won’t be protested,” it piqued the interest of many. What criteria did they use this time to ensure a peaceful ceremony?

Criteria for a Non-Controversial Speaker

Finding a speaker who won’t stir the pot requires a specific set of criteria. Here are some factors that could contribute to that decision:

1. **Reputation and Public Perception**: The speaker should have a positive reputation and be viewed favorably by the public. This includes avoiding any divisive political stances or previous controversies.

2. **Relevance to Graduates**: The speaker should be relatable to the graduates. This means considering their background, achievements, and the current state of the world that the graduates are stepping into.

3. **Inspirational Message**: The speaker should convey a message that uplifts and inspires students. A focus on unity, perseverance, and success often resonates well.

4. **Cultural Sensitivity**: Given the diverse backgrounds of students, a speaker should be culturally aware and sensitive to the various perspectives present in the audience.

5. **Non-Political Background**: Opting for someone whose career is less tied to the political landscape can often lead to a more peaceful event. This does not mean they should lack a voice, but rather that their focus is more on their achievements and less on political ideologies.

These criteria could explain why the University of Maryland was successful in avoiding controversy this year.

The Importance of a Commencement Speaker

The role of a commencement speaker goes beyond just giving a speech; it’s about creating a memorable moment in the lives of graduates. Commencement is often one of the most significant milestones in a person’s life, symbolizing the culmination of years of hard work and dedication. A good speaker can leave a lasting impression, offering wisdom, encouragement, and a sense of closure as students prepare to embark on the next chapter of their lives.

Moreover, in a world that is increasingly polarized, a commencement speaker has the opportunity to unite rather than divide. This is particularly important in today’s climate, where graduates may feel uncertain about their futures. A speaker who can convey messages of hope and resilience can do wonders for a graduating class’s morale.

The Impact of Social Media on Commencement Speakers

In the age of social media, the announcement of a commencement speaker can lead to immediate reactions, including both praise and criticism. Platforms like Twitter, where Kesslen shared his thoughts, amplify voices and opinions, making the speaker selection process even more scrutinized.

When the University of Maryland announced their speaker, it was likely that the surrounding community and beyond took to social media to express their thoughts. This can create pressure on universities to select speakers who align with the majority’s views, potentially leading to a cycle where only non-controversial figures are chosen. While this might make for a peaceful ceremony, it can also stifle open dialogue and critical thinking, which are vital components of a university education.

Looking Ahead: The Future of Commencement Speakers

As we move forward, the landscape of commencement speakers will continue to evolve. Universities must balance the desire for inspirational figures with the complexities of today’s social and political climate. The selection of a speaker who won’t be protested, as highlighted by Kesslen, reflects a growing trend of cautious decision-making among institutions.

It’s essential for universities to foster an environment where diverse voices can be heard, even if that means occasionally facing protests or pushback. While it may be tempting to only invite speakers who are universally accepted, this could lead to a lack of engagement with real-world issues and a missed opportunity for growth and discussion.

The Role of Students in Speaker Selection

Students play a crucial role in the selection of commencement speakers. Their voices should be heard in the process, as they are the ones directly affected by the choice. Engaging students in discussions about potential speakers can help universities gauge the pulse of the student body. By doing so, institutions can arrive at a compromise that respects diverse opinions while also contributing to a meaningful ceremony.

Moreover, universities could consider hosting discussions or panels where students can express their views and concerns about potential speakers. Such initiatives would empower students and transform the selection process into a more inclusive and democratic practice.

Conclusion: The Takeaway

Kesslen’s tweet brings to light an essential aspect of university life: the importance of a commencement speaker who can inspire and unite rather than divide. The University of Maryland’s success in finding a speaker who won’t be protested serves as a reminder of the careful thought that goes into these decisions.

As we celebrate graduation ceremonies, we should also reflect on the broader implications of speaker selections. Universities hold the power to shape dialogues around critical issues, and by inviting speakers who can engage with these topics respectfully, they can contribute to a more informed and empathetic society.

Ultimately, it’s about finding the right balance—one that honors the diversity of thought and experience while also celebrating the achievement that graduation represents. As more universities navigate these waters, let’s hope they continue to prioritize the values of inspiration, unity, and respect while making their selections.