In a controversial tweet, user C3 accuses Chief Justice John Roberts of being complicit in various judicial wrongdoings, labeling him as part of a “judicial coup.” The tweet lists several instances where Roberts allegedly acted in a manner that goes against the principles of justice and the rule of law.

One of the accusations leveled against Roberts is that he saved the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare, despite it being deemed unconstitutional by some critics. This decision by Roberts was highly criticized by conservative circles who believed that the ACA overstepped the boundaries of the Constitution.

Furthermore, the tweet suggests that Roberts protected Sheldon Snook, the alleged leaker of the Dobbs decision. This action implies that Roberts may have been involved in shielding individuals who engage in unethical behavior that undermines the integrity of the judiciary.

Another accusation made in the tweet is that Roberts appointed Judge Boasberg, described as a Marxist, to preside over the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA Court). This appointment raises concerns about the impartiality and fairness of the FISA Court, which plays a crucial role in overseeing surveillance activities in the United States.

The tweet also mentions Roberts’ alleged protection of Eric Ciamarella, the whistleblower in the Ukraine impeachment scandal. By shielding Ciamarella, Roberts is accused of obstructing justice and allowing individuals to evade accountability for their actions.

Overall, the tweet paints Chief Justice John Roberts in a negative light, portraying him as a key figure in a supposed conspiracy within the judiciary to subvert the rule of law. These accusations raise serious concerns about the integrity and independence of the judicial system, highlighting the need for transparency and accountability in the highest echelons of the legal profession.

Justice Roberts…

Saved the unconstitutional Obamacare.

Protected Dobbs decision leaker Sheldon Snook.

Appointed Marxist Judge Boasberg to preside over the FISA Court

Protected fake Ukraine impeachment whistleblower Eric Ciamarella.

John Roberts is part of the judicial coup.

— C3 (@C_3C_3) May 16, 2025

In recent years, there has been a lot of controversy surrounding Chief Justice John Roberts and his decisions on various legal matters. From saving the unconstitutional Obamacare to protecting individuals like Dobbs decision leaker Sheldon Snook and fake Ukraine impeachment whistleblower Eric Ciamarella, Roberts has been at the center of some highly contentious issues. Let’s delve into some of these key events and explore the implications of Roberts’ actions.

Saved the Unconstitutional Obamacare

One of the most significant decisions made by Chief Justice Roberts was his role in saving the Affordable Care Act, commonly known as Obamacare. In a landmark ruling in 2012, Roberts cast the deciding vote to uphold the constitutionality of the individual mandate, a key provision of the healthcare law. This decision was met with both praise and criticism, with many questioning the Chief Justice’s reasoning behind his vote.

The decision to uphold Obamacare was seen as a pivotal moment in the realm of healthcare policy, ensuring that millions of Americans would continue to have access to affordable health insurance. However, critics argued that Roberts had overstepped his judicial authority by essentially rewriting the law to save it from being struck down.

Protected Dobbs Decision Leaker Sheldon Snook

Another controversial incident involving Chief Justice Roberts was his alleged protection of Sheldon Snook, the leaker behind the Dobbs decision. The leaked confidential information regarding the Supreme Court’s decision in the Dobbs case caused a stir in legal circles, with many questioning the integrity of the court’s decision-making process.

Roberts’ alleged protection of Snook raised concerns about transparency and accountability within the highest court in the land. Many critics argued that such actions undermined the credibility of the Supreme Court and eroded public trust in the judicial system. The Chief Justice’s role in this incident further fueled speculation about his motives and allegiances.

Appointed Marxist Judge Boasberg to Preside Over the FISA Court

In a move that raised eyebrows among legal scholars and pundits, Chief Justice Roberts appointed Marxist Judge Boasberg to preside over the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA Court). The FISA Court plays a crucial role in overseeing government surveillance activities and is tasked with protecting the civil liberties of Americans.

Boasberg’s appointment was met with skepticism and criticism, with many questioning his ability to impartially preside over such sensitive matters. Critics argued that Boasberg’s political leanings could compromise the integrity of the FISA Court and undermine its ability to provide independent oversight of government surveillance programs.

Protected Fake Ukraine Impeachment Whistleblower Eric Ciamarella

One of the most controversial episodes involving Chief Justice Roberts was his alleged protection of fake Ukraine impeachment whistleblower Eric Ciamarella. The whistleblower’s identity had been a subject of intense speculation and debate, with many accusing Roberts of shielding Ciamarella from scrutiny.

Roberts’ alleged protection of Ciamarella raised concerns about transparency and accountability within the impeachment process. Critics argued that by shielding the whistleblower’s identity, Roberts had hindered efforts to uncover the truth behind the Ukraine scandal and hold those responsible accountable for their actions.

John Roberts is Part of the Judicial Coup

In light of these controversial incidents, many have accused Chief Justice Roberts of being part of a judicial coup aimed at subverting the rule of law and undermining the Constitution. Critics allege that Roberts has repeatedly sided with liberal interests and abandoned his conservative principles, leading to a erosion of the court’s credibility and independence.

The Chief Justice’s actions have sparked a fierce debate about the role of the judiciary in American society and the importance of maintaining a fair and impartial legal system. Many argue that Roberts’ decisions have far-reaching implications for the future of the country and the integrity of the judicial branch.

In conclusion, Chief Justice John Roberts’ actions in saving the unconstitutional Obamacare, protecting individuals like Sheldon Snook and Eric Ciamarella, and appointing Judge Boasberg to the FISA Court have raised serious questions about his judicial philosophy and motivations. As the highest-ranking member of the Supreme Court, Roberts wields immense power and influence over the legal landscape of the United States. It remains to be seen how his legacy will be remembered in the annals of American jurisprudence.