In a thought-provoking video, Soumaya Ghannoushi, a noted writer and Middle East politics expert, critiques US President Donald trump’s tour of Riyadh, Abu Dhabi, and Doha. She argues that this diplomatic endeavor is not genuine diplomacy but rather “theatre—staged in gold and fuelled by greed.” Ghannoushi’s analysis highlights the complexities of US-Middle East relations and suggests that such high-profile visits often prioritize spectacle over substantive policy. For those interested in understanding the motivations behind international diplomacy in the region, this commentary provides valuable insights. Explore her perspective on the interplay of politics, wealth, and influence in the Middle East.

In this opinion video, Soumaya Ghannoushi — a writer and expert on Middle East politics — examines US President Donald Trump’s tour of Riyadh, Abu Dhabi, and Doha, arguing that it is not diplomacy, but “theatre—staged in gold and fuelled by greed.” pic.twitter.com/pNhMUlG7SD

• Check out these discounted items on TikTok

— Middle East Eye (@MiddleEastEye) May 16, 2025

In this opinion video, Soumaya Ghannoushi — a writer and expert on Middle East politics — examines US President Donald Trump’s tour of Riyadh, Abu Dhabi, and Doha, arguing that it is not diplomacy, but “theatre—staged in gold and fuelled by greed.”

When you think about Donald Trump’s presidency, a lot comes to mind—his loud tweets, controversial policies, and, of course, his foreign trips. One trip that stands out is his tour of Riyadh, Abu Dhabi, and Doha. In an insightful opinion video by news/opinion-video-us-tour-middle-east-theatre-greed”>Soumaya Ghannoushi, a well-respected writer and expert on Middle Eastern politics, she dives deep into this trip and presents a compelling argument: it wasn’t diplomacy; it was more like a grand performance, a “theatre” staged in opulence and fueled by greed.

Understanding the Context of Trump’s Middle East Tour

To fully grasp Soumaya Ghannoushi’s perspective, it’s essential to understand the context surrounding Trump’s Middle East tour. Back in 2017, Trump made headlines by visiting Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Qatar. These countries are key players in the Middle East, known for their wealth and influence. But what was truly happening behind the scenes? Was this a genuine effort to forge diplomatic ties, or was it simply a show designed to enhance Trump’s image?

Ghannoushi argues that this tour was not about building meaningful relationships. Instead, it was about showcasing power and wealth. The lavish receptions, gold-plated venues, and extravagant displays were all part of a carefully orchestrated performance, aimed at impressing both domestic audiences back in the U.S. and international observers.

Theatre Versus Diplomacy: What’s the Difference?

So, what makes Ghannoushi’s argument so compelling? The distinction between theatre and diplomacy is crucial. Diplomacy typically involves negotiations, understanding, and genuine efforts to resolve conflicts and build partnerships. On the other hand, theatre in politics often involves grand gestures and performances designed to create a particular image or narrative.

Ghannoushi emphasizes that Trump’s tour exemplified this theatrical approach. Instead of real discussions about critical issues—like human rights, regional security, or economic partnerships—the focus was largely on showcasing wealth and spectacle. The media coverage highlighted the opulence of the events, which overshadowed any substantive discussions that might have taken place.

The Role of Greed in International Relations

Greed plays a significant role in Ghannoushi’s analysis. The Middle East is rich in resources, particularly oil and gas, and these resources have historically influenced international relations. Trump’s administration was known for its close ties to the oil and gas industries, and many critics argue that these relationships shaped U.S. foreign policy.

In the opinion video, Ghannoushi points out that the rhetoric surrounding the trip was often intertwined with economic interests. For instance, Trump’s enthusiastic embrace of Saudi Arabia can be seen as a bid to secure lucrative arms deals and bolster economic ties. Critics argue that this focus on profit often comes at the expense of ethical considerations, such as human rights abuses in the region.

Responses from the Arab World

Interestingly, the reactions from the Arab world to Trump’s tour were mixed. While some leaders welcomed the visit, hoping to strengthen ties with the U.S., others were more skeptical. They questioned whether Trump’s approach to foreign policy would truly benefit their nations or if it was merely a quest for personal gain.

Ghannoushi’s video highlights these reactions, providing a nuanced understanding of how Trump’s visit was perceived. Some leaders appreciated the attention and the potential for economic partnerships, while others were wary of the underlying motives. This skepticism is crucial, as it reflects a broader sentiment in the region regarding U.S. involvement in Middle Eastern affairs.

The Legacy of Trump’s Tour

As we reflect on the legacy of Trump’s tour of Riyadh, Abu Dhabi, and Doha, it’s essential to consider the long-term implications of this theatrical approach to diplomacy. Ghannoushi argues that while the trip may have generated headlines and immediate attention, it did little to foster genuine relationships or address the pressing issues facing the region.

This raises important questions about the effectiveness of such diplomatic theatrics. Are flashy trips and grand gestures genuinely beneficial for international relations, or do they merely serve to distract from more profound issues? Ghannoushi’s perspective encourages us to think critically about what constitutes real diplomacy in today’s world.

The Impact on Future U.S.-Middle East Relations

Looking ahead, the implications of Trump’s theatrical tour extend beyond his presidency. The relationships forged—or merely performed—during this trip will continue to influence U.S.-Middle East relations for years to come. Leaders in the region may find it challenging to trust future U.S. administrations that prioritize spectacle over substance.

Moreover, the focus on economic interests and geopolitical maneuvering can lead to a cycle of mistrust and resentment. If future administrations fail to learn from the mistakes of the past, we may see a continuation of superficial diplomacy that prioritizes short-term gains over long-term stability and cooperation.

Conclusion: A Call for Genuine Diplomacy

In her opinion video, Soumaya Ghannoushi challenges us to reconsider our understanding of diplomacy, particularly in the context of U.S.-Middle East relations. By framing Trump’s tour as a theatrical performance rather than a genuine diplomatic effort, she highlights the need for a more nuanced approach to international relations.

As we move forward, there is a pressing need for leaders to engage in authentic dialogue and foster relationships built on trust and mutual respect. The world is watching, and it’s time for diplomacy to step out of the shadows of theatre and into the light of meaningful engagement.

In summary, Soumaya Ghannoushi’s analysis provides valuable insights into the complexities of Middle Eastern politics and the role of U.S. leadership. Her argument encourages us to look beyond the surface and seek genuine connections that can lead to a more stable and prosperous future for all.