In a recent segment on MSNBC, a controversial discussion unfolded regarding the status of white South Africans seeking asylum in the United States. The conversation, highlighted by guest Richard Stengel, sparked significant debate around the notion of white supremacy and its historical implications, particularly in relation to the old Confederacy of the United States.

### The Context of the Discussion

The segment focused on the plight of white South Africans and their claims for asylum in the U.S. This topic has been polarizing, as it intertwines issues of race, historical injustices, and contemporary political narratives. Stengel’s remarks emphasized that, according to him, there is “no injustice” being experienced by white South Africans, which aligns with a broader narrative questioning the legitimacy of their claims for refuge.

### White Supremacy and Historical Parallels

The assertion made by MSNBC that white South Africans are “descendants of white supremacy” and likening them to the “old Confederacy” brings to light the complex history of both groups. The Confederacy, which existed in the southern United States during the Civil war, was founded on principles that upheld slavery and racial segregation. Drawing parallels between the two groups raises critical questions about the experiences and historical contexts of white South Africans versus their American counterparts.

### Richard Stengel’s Position

Richard Stengel, who served as the Under Secretary of state for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs under President Obama, argued that the narrative surrounding white South Africans is being co-opted by right-wing factions to further their agenda. He posited that the Afrikaners, a group of Dutch descent in South Africa, have become “the darling of these right-wing white groups,” suggesting an exploitation of their plight for political gain.

### The Reaction to the Segment

The segment ignited a backlash on social media, particularly among those who feel that the plight of white South Africans is being dismissed. Critics of Stengel and MSNBC argue that this perspective overlooks the unique challenges faced by white farmers in South Africa, many of whom have been victims of violent crimes and land seizures. The discussion has reignited debates about race, privilege, and the complexities of seeking asylum based on ethnic or racial identity.

### The Broader Implications

This conversation touches on broader themes of immigration, asylum, and identity politics in the United States. As the country grapples with its own historical injustices, the discussion around who qualifies for asylum and why can lead to heated debates. The implications of classifying certain groups as beneficiaries of “white supremacy” complicate the narratives surrounding race and justice, potentially impacting public perception and policy.

### Conclusion

The MSNBC segment featuring Richard Stengel has sparked a significant discourse on white South Africans and their claims for asylum, intertwining themes of race, history, and politics. As the dialogue continues, it remains critical to approach these discussions with a nuanced understanding of the historical contexts involved, recognizing that the experiences of different groups can vary greatly. This situation exemplifies the ongoing struggle to reconcile past injustices with present realities, prompting further examination of how society defines and addresses these complex issues.

As discussions surrounding race and asylum continue to evolve, it is essential for media outlets, policymakers, and the public to engage thoughtfully and critically with these narratives. The dialogue surrounding white South Africans, the old Confederacy, and the implications of such comparisons will likely persist, making it a pivotal topic in contemporary discussions of race and justice in America.

BREAKING: MSNBC says trump‘s asylee South Africans are “white supremacy” descendants and compares them to the “old Confederacy.”

Guest Richard Stengel insists “there’s no injustice” to South African Whites.

“The Afrikaners have become the darling of these right-wing white… pic.twitter.com/x8virdne2r

— Resist the Mainstream (@ResisttheMS) May 12, 2025

BREAKING: MSNBC Says Trump’s Asylee South Africans Are "White Supremacy" Descendants and Compares Them to the "Old Confederacy."

In a recent segment on MSNBC, a heated discussion unfolded regarding the controversial topic of asylum for South African farmers, particularly the Afrikaners. The network’s guest, Richard Stengel, made the bold claim that these individuals are "white supremacy" descendants and drew parallels between them and the "old Confederacy." This comparison has ignited a firestorm of debate across social media and among political commentators, leading us to delve deeper into the implications of such statements.

The Context of Asylum for South African Farmers

The situation surrounding South African farmers, especially Afrikaners, is complex. For years, there have been reports of violence and land seizures targeting white farmers in South Africa. Advocates for these farmers argue that they face genuine threats that warrant asylum in countries like the United States. However, critics, including Stengel, suggest that the narrative surrounding these farmers is often manipulated by right-wing groups to evoke sympathy for a demographic that historically benefited from apartheid policies.

Stengel’s assertion that "there’s no injustice" to South African whites raises eyebrows. It suggests a dismissal of the real fears and challenges faced by these individuals. By framing their plight within the context of white supremacy, Stengel is challenging the legitimacy of their claims for asylum and redirecting the conversation toward historical injustices that have shaped the current socio-political landscape.

The Afrikaners and the Right-Wing Narrative

The discussion around the Afrikaners is not just a matter of historical context; it’s also about how narratives are constructed in contemporary politics. The claim that "the Afrikaners have become the darling of these right-wing white" groups highlights a significant shift. Many right-wing commentators have indeed rallied around the Afrikaners, presenting their struggle as emblematic of a broader fight against political correctness and social justice movements.

This narrative resonates with a segment of the population that feels disenfranchised or threatened by changing social dynamics. It taps into fears of cultural erasure and economic instability, creating a potent mix of emotion and political motivation. However, critics argue that this framing oversimplifies a much more nuanced issue and fails to address the systemic inequalities that persist in both South Africa and the United States.

The Old Confederacy Comparison

When MSNBC’s segment compared the Afrikaners to the "old Confederacy," it was a striking analogy that stirred up historical memories. The Confederacy, which fought to maintain slavery and white supremacy in the United States, represents a painful chapter in American history. By likening modern-day Afrikaners to this legacy, Stengel is suggesting that their claims are rooted in a similar ideology of entitlement and privilege.

This comparison inevitably raises questions about identity, race, and the legacy of colonialism. Are the Afrikaners simply victims of a changing landscape, or are they representatives of a historical oppression that cannot be ignored? Such questions complicate the discussion around asylum and force us to confront uncomfortable truths about race relations, both in South Africa and the U.S.

Public Reaction and Media Responsibility

The reaction to Stengel’s comments has been mixed, with some applauding the boldness of his statements while others vehemently oppose them. Social media platforms have been ablaze with discussions, memes, and commentary on the topic. Critics argue that labeling the Afrikaners as manifestations of white supremacy is not only reductive but also harmful. It risks alienating those who genuinely fear for their safety in South Africa while simultaneously adding fuel to extremist narratives in the United States.

The media’s role in shaping public perception is crucial. MSNBC, as a prominent news outlet, has a responsibility to present balanced viewpoints while also challenging narratives that could perpetuate division and misunderstanding. However, sensationalism often takes the forefront in discussions, particularly when it comes to polarizing issues like race and immigration.

The Broader Implications of Asylum Policies

The ongoing debate surrounding South African farmers and their quest for asylum is part of a larger conversation about immigration policies in the U.S. and how they are influenced by race and historical context. The Trump administration, in particular, made headlines for its hardline stance on immigration, often framing the discussion around "deserving" and "undeserving" immigrants.

The portrayal of South African whites as victims of injustice fits neatly into a narrative that appeals to conservative viewpoints. However, it also raises critical questions about who gets to tell these stories and which experiences are deemed valid. Asylum policies should ideally reflect a commitment to human rights, regardless of race or historical background, yet the reality is often far more complicated.

Engaging with Complex Narratives

As we digest the information presented by MSNBC and the subsequent reactions, it’s essential to engage with the complexities of these narratives. Simplistic classifications of individuals or groups can lead to harmful stereotypes and perpetuate cycles of misunderstanding.

Rather than viewing the situation through a lens of black-and-white morality, it might be more productive to recognize the shades of gray that exist. The Afrikaners’ history is intertwined with colonialism and apartheid, and acknowledging this context is crucial in understanding their present circumstances. However, this does not negate the legitimate fears that many Afrikaners experience today, nor does it give carte blanche to dismiss their claims for asylum.

Conclusion: Navigating Nuance in Political Discourse

The conversation around asylum for South African farmers is emblematic of larger societal issues that demand careful consideration. As we grapple with the implications of statements like those made by Stengel, it’s vital to maintain a sense of nuance and empathy.

Political discourse is often fraught with tension and misunderstanding, but by striving to understand the complexities of individual stories, we can foster a more informed and compassionate dialogue. Whether one agrees with MSNBC’s framing or not, the conversation itself is a reminder of the importance of examining history, identity, and the realities of those seeking refuge from violence and persecution.

As we continue to engage with these topics, let’s keep our eyes open to the broader implications of our discussions and the narratives we choose to amplify. It’s only through this kind of thoughtful engagement that we can hope to make progress toward a more just and equitable society.

BREAKING: MSNBC says Trump's asylee South Africans are "white supremacy" descendants and compares them to the "old Confederacy."

Guest Richard Stengel insists "there's no injustice" to South African Whites.

"The Afrikaners have become the darling of these right-wing white