In a recent interview with the BBC, Indian High Commissioner to the UK, Vikram Doraiswami, addressed critical issues surrounding terrorism and regional stability, particularly in relation to Pakistan and the ongoing Kashmir conflict. His statements have sparked discussions about the long-standing tensions between India and Pakistan, as well as the issues surrounding terrorism in the region.

### Indian Envoy Highlights Terrorism Concerns

During the interview, Doraiswami emphasized that India has made significant strides in dismantling terrorist infrastructure within its borders. He boldly stated, “We have taken out terror infrastructure,” reflecting India’s ongoing efforts to counter terrorism and enhance national security. This assertion underscores India’s commitment to addressing the threats posed by terrorism, which it attributes largely to external actors, particularly Pakistan.

### Pakistan’s Role in Terrorism

Doraiswami further articulated India’s position on Pakistan’s involvement in terrorism, asserting that “Pakistan has terrorist infrastructure for the last 30 years.” This comment aligns with India’s long-standing narrative that Pakistan has been a breeding ground for terrorist activities aimed at destabilizing India. The envoy’s remarks highlight the ongoing concern in India regarding the support that various terrorist organizations receive from Pakistan, a point that has been echoed by Indian leadership for decades.

### Acknowledgment of Terrorism by Pakistan’s Leadership

In a significant aspect of the conversation, Doraiswami pointed out that Pakistan’s leadership has “acknowledged support to terrorism.” This statement is particularly noteworthy as it suggests that even within Pakistan, there is an awareness of the country’s complex relationship with terrorist organizations. By bringing this acknowledgment to light, Doraiswami aims to draw attention to the need for accountability and a change in behavior from Pakistan if there is to be any hope for regional peace.

### Clarifying Kashmir Terminology

An essential part of the discussion revolved around the contentious issue of Kashmir. Doraiswami took the opportunity to correct the BBC on its terminology regarding Kashmir, which indicates India’s sensitivity to how the issue is framed in international discourse. The Kashmir conflict has been a focal point of India-Pakistan relations, and the way it is presented in global media can significantly influence perceptions and diplomatic relations.

### The Broader Implications of Doraiswami’s Statements

The statements made by the Indian envoy are crucial not only for understanding India’s stance on terrorism but also for comprehending the broader geopolitical landscape in South Asia. India has consistently advocated for a zero-tolerance policy towards terrorism, emphasizing the need for global cooperation in combating this threat. Doraiswami’s comments serve as a reminder of the complexities of the region, where historical grievances and contemporary challenges intertwine.

### Conclusion: A Call for International Attention

Doraiswami’s interview with the BBC is a significant moment in the ongoing dialogue about terrorism and regional stability in South Asia. By highlighting the terrorist infrastructure in Pakistan and the acknowledgment of such support by its leadership, he calls for greater international scrutiny and action against terrorism. Furthermore, his efforts to clarify the terminology used in discussing Kashmir reflect India’s desire to shape the narrative around this sensitive issue.

As the situation evolves, it is imperative for global stakeholders to pay attention to these developments. The fight against terrorism is not solely an internal matter for countries like India and Pakistan but a global challenge that requires a unified response. The international community must engage in constructive dialogue to address the root causes of terrorism and work towards lasting peace in the region.

In summary, the statements made by Indian Envoy Vikram Doraiswami reveal the complexities surrounding terrorism and regional stability in South Asia. By asserting India’s proactive measures against terrorism, highlighting Pakistan’s role, and clarifying the Kashmir narrative, Doraiswami emphasizes the need for increased international awareness and action in addressing these critical issues. The interview serves as a reminder of the importance of collaborative efforts to combat terrorism and promote peace in the region.

Indian Envoy to UK @HCI_London @VDoraiswami to BBC

‘We have taken out terror infrastructure’

‘Pakistan has terrorist infrastructure for last 30 years’

‘Pakistan’s leadership have acknowledged support to terrorism’

Corrects BBC on Kashmir terminologypic.twitter.com/0cMnyKJH7y

— Sidhant Sibal (@sidhant) May 10, 2025

Indian Envoy to UK @HCI_London @VDoraiswami to BBC

In a recent interview with the BBC, the Indian High Commissioner to the UK, @HCI_London, @VDoraiswami, made some impactful statements regarding terrorism and regional politics. His remarks sparked discussions on the longstanding issues surrounding terrorism and the complex relationship between India and Pakistan. Let’s dive into what was said and the implications of these statements.

‘We have taken out terror infrastructure’

The High Commissioner boldly asserted, “We have taken out terror infrastructure,” a statement that underscores India’s ongoing efforts to combat terrorism. This assertion reflects India’s commitment to national security and its determination to tackle terror groups that threaten its sovereignty. Over recent years, India has intensified its military operations against terrorist groups, especially those operating from territories across the border. This proactive stance has aimed not just to eliminate immediate threats but also to disrupt the support systems that sustain these groups.

India’s efforts have often been met with skepticism and criticism from international observers. However, the Indian government maintains that it is a necessary measure to ensure safety and security for its citizens. The conversation about terror infrastructure is not just about military engagement; it’s also about addressing the root causes of terrorism in the region, which many believe are linked to political instability and external influences.

‘Pakistan has terrorist infrastructure for last 30 years’

The High Commissioner didn’t hold back when discussing Pakistan, stating, “Pakistan has terrorist infrastructure for last 30 years.” This comment highlights a narrative that has been prevalent in Indian discourse for decades—the notion that Pakistan has been a haven for terrorist activities aimed at destabilizing India. Numerous reports and investigations have pointed to the existence of terrorist training camps within Pakistan, which have allegedly been used to launch attacks against Indian targets.

This assertion is crucial as it brings to light the historical context of the conflict between the two nations. For many Indians, this isn’t just a political issue; it’s personal. Families have been affected by violence, and many citizens feel a deep sense of urgency to address and dismantle these terrorist networks. The High Commissioner’s statements serve to reinforce this sentiment, rallying public support for continued efforts against terrorism.

‘Pakistan’s leadership have acknowledged support to terrorism’

Another significant point made by the Indian envoy was, “Pakistan’s leadership have acknowledged support to terrorism.” This statement references a long-standing accusation that Pakistani authorities have, at times, turned a blind eye to or even supported terrorist activities that target India. The acknowledgment from various Pakistani leaders, whether in official statements or through leaked communications, adds a layer of complexity to the geopolitical dynamics between the two nations.

This acknowledgment becomes a crucial talking point in international forums, where India seeks to highlight the necessity for a unified global stance against terrorism. The gravity of this statement can’t be overstated, as it suggests an underlying complicity that has international implications. Countries around the world have been urged to reconsider their diplomatic relations with Pakistan, especially concerning military and economic aid, in light of these accusations.

Corrects BBC on Kashmir terminology

In addition to addressing terrorism, the High Commissioner took the opportunity to correct the BBC on its terminology regarding Kashmir. This may seem like a minor point, but it speaks volumes about the sensitivity surrounding the Kashmir issue. Kashmir has been a contentious territory between India and Pakistan since 1947, with both countries claiming it in full but controlling only parts of it.

The way media outlets describe Kashmir can influence public perception and international opinion. By insisting on correct terminology, the High Commissioner aims to ensure that the narrative surrounding Kashmir aligns with India’s perspective. This is an essential aspect of diplomatic communication, as it seeks to shape the discourse in a way that supports India’s claims and policies in the region.

The insistence on proper terminology is also a reflection of the broader struggle for narrative control in international politics. In a world where information spreads rapidly, the terminology used in discussions can significantly affect international relations and policy decisions. By addressing this issue, the High Commissioner is not just engaging in a semantic correction; he’s participating in a larger battle for India’s narrative on the global stage.

The Impact of the Indian Envoy’s Statements

The statements made by the Indian envoy are likely to resonate beyond the immediate news cycle. They serve as a reminder of the complex and often fraught relationship between India and Pakistan. The focus on terrorism, the acknowledgment of infrastructure supporting such activities, and the correction of terminology regarding Kashmir all contribute to a broader narrative that India seeks to promote internationally.

These discussions are critical as they shape perceptions, influence diplomatic relations, and even affect the lives of millions living in both countries. The ongoing dialogue is not just about political posturing; it has real-world implications for security, stability, and peace in the region.

As the global community watches, India’s narrative continues to evolve. The statements made by the Indian High Commissioner to the UK are part of a larger strategy to assert India’s position in the world and address the challenges posed by terrorism and territorial disputes. It’s a reminder of the ongoing struggle for peace and security in a region that has seen too much conflict.

By making these declarations, the Indian envoy underscores the importance of international attention on terrorism and the need for a collective effort to address it. The conversation is far from over, and as events unfold, the world will be keenly observing how these statements impact diplomatic relations and regional stability.

In summary, the Indian envoy’s statements reflect a deep-seated commitment to addressing terrorism and securing national interests. They also highlight the complexities of the India-Pakistan relationship and the ongoing struggle for narrative control in international discourse. As these discussions continue, they will undoubtedly shape the future of regional politics and global perceptions of terrorism in South Asia.