Breaking news: Kristi Noem’s Controversial Stance on Illegal Immigration
In a recent announcement that has sparked intense discussions, Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem expressed her support for allowing illegal immigrants the option to self-deport. This proposal challenges traditional views on immigration enforcement and raises important questions about the complexities surrounding illegal residency in the United States.
The Context of Self-Deportation Policy
Self-deportation refers to a policy that encourages individuals unlawfully residing in the country to voluntarily leave instead of facing arrest and forced deportation. Noem’s endorsement of this approach is particularly noteworthy given her influential role as DHS Secretary. Her statements indicate a potential shift in the government’s strategy towards handling illegal immigration, emphasizing personal choice and responsibility.
Key Quote from Secretary Noem
During her announcement, Noem articulated, “If they wait until we arrest and deport them, they don’t ever get the chance to come back.” This quote encapsulates her belief that allowing individuals to leave voluntarily may provide them with opportunities for future legal re-entry into the United States. This perspective suggests that voluntary departure may mitigate the long-term consequences associated with forced removal, which often results in lengthy bans on re-entry.
Public Reaction and Implications
Noem’s remarks have elicited polarized reactions across the political spectrum. Supporters argue that this approach could reduce the strain on law enforcement and the legal system, encouraging compliance with immigration laws while allowing individuals to avoid the stigma and trauma often associated with deportation. They view it as a humane alternative that respects individual agency.
- YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO WATCH THIS TRENDING STORY ON YOUTUBE. Waverly Hills Hospital's Horror Story: The Most Haunted Room 502
Conversely, critics argue that such a policy might undermine the rule of law and encourage further illegal immigration, as it could be perceived as an invitation for non-compliance with immigration regulations. This debate reflects broader tensions surrounding immigration policy in the United States, where opinions are deeply divided.
The Broader Immigration Debate
The issue of illegal immigration is multifaceted, encompassing economic, social, and humanitarian dimensions. Advocates for reform argue that a balanced approach is necessary—one that addresses the needs of the economy, public safety, and the rights of individuals seeking a better life. Noem’s proposed self-deportation policy touches on these concerns, attempting to find a middle ground between enforcement and compassion.
The Future of Immigration Policy
As the Biden administration grapples with immigration reform, Noem’s statements may signal a potential shift in how the government approaches illegal immigration. Whether this policy gains traction remains to be seen, but it undoubtedly adds fuel to the ongoing debate about effectively addressing illegal residency in the United States.
Conclusion
Kristi Noem’s support for allowing illegal immigrants to self-deport is a significant development in the ongoing dialogue about immigration policy in America. By framing her argument around personal choice and future opportunities for re-entry, she raises important questions about the balance between enforcement and compassion in immigration practices. As discussions evolve, stakeholders from all sides will need to consider the implications of such policies and their potential effects on individuals and communities involved.
This announcement not only highlights the complexities of immigration policy but also reflects the urgency with which lawmakers are trying to address the situation at U.S. borders. As the nation continues to navigate its immigration challenges, Noem’s remarks serve as a reminder of the diverse perspectives that exist within this multifaceted issue. The future of U.S. immigration policy may hinge on finding effective and humane solutions that respect the rule of law while recognizing the human stories behind the statistics.
SEO Optimization
To ensure this summary reaches a wide audience, keywords related to immigration, self-deportation, Kristi Noem, and DHS policies have been strategically incorporated. This will enhance visibility in search engines, allowing individuals interested in immigration reform, policy discussions, and recent news to easily find and engage with this content.
Through clear headings and concise language, this summary aims to inform readers while also optimizing for search engine performance, making it a valuable resource for anyone looking to understand the nuances of the current immigration debate in the United States.
Social Media Impact
Noem’s statements have quickly gained traction on social media, exemplifying how digital platforms can influence public discourse on immigration. The phrase “MIC DROP” has become synonymous with impactful moments, and in this context, Noem’s declaration has certainly made waves, prompting discussions about the future of immigration policy and the efficacy of current deportation practices.
Supporters argue that self-deportation could alleviate pressures on the immigration system and foster goodwill among immigrant communities. However, critics warn that it could inadvertently encourage more illegal immigration, raising concerns about the implications of such a policy.
Legal and Economic Considerations
The legal implications of a self-deportation policy are complex, potentially requiring significant revisions to existing immigration laws. Additionally, many undocumented immigrants play critical roles in various sectors, and a mass self-deportation could create labor shortages in industries that rely heavily on their contributions.
As this conversation unfolds, it’s crucial to consider the economic landscape and the potential effects of self-deportation on the U.S. economy. Policymakers must navigate these considerations thoughtfully to find solutions that benefit both individuals and society as a whole.
Moving Forward
As the dialogue surrounding self-deportation evolves, it’s clear that this is just the beginning of a larger conversation about immigration in the United States. Engaging with the complexities of immigration requires a willingness to listen to the stories and experiences of those affected. It’s essential to move beyond political rhetoric and consider the human impact of these policies.
The discussion surrounding self-deportation will continue to evolve, and whether it leads to significant policy changes or simply sparks further debate, one thing is certain: immigration remains a critical issue that will shape the future of the United States. By fostering open dialogue and considering diverse perspectives, we can work towards a more inclusive and understanding approach to immigration, ensuring that compassion remains at the forefront of policy discussions.
BREAKING DHS Secretary Kristi Noem supports allowing Illegal immigrants Self Deport themselves
“If they wait until we arrest and deport them, they don’t ever get the chance to come back”
MIC DROP
—————–
- YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO WATCH THIS TRENDING STORY ON YOUTUBE. : Chilling Hospital Horror Ghost Stories—Real Experience from Healthcare Workers
Breaking News: DHS Secretary Kristi Noem’s Controversial Stance on Illegal Immigration
In a recent announcement that has ignited discussions across social media and beyond, DHS Secretary Kristi Noem has expressed her support for a policy that allows illegal immigrants the option to self-deport. This statement has sparked a wave of reactions, as it challenges traditional views on immigration enforcement and the complexities surrounding the issues of illegal residency in the United States.
The Context of Self-Deportation Policy
The concept of self-deportation is not entirely new in U.S. immigration discourse. It refers to a policy that encourages individuals who are unlawfully residing in the country to voluntarily leave rather than facing arrest and forced deportation. Kristi Noem’s endorsement of this approach is particularly significant given her role as the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). Her statement suggests a potential shift in the government’s strategy towards handling illegal immigration, emphasizing personal choice and responsibility.
Key Quote from Secretary Noem
During her announcement, Noem articulated her perspective clearly: “If they wait until we arrest and deport them, they don’t ever get the chance to come back.” This quote encapsulates her viewpoint that allowing individuals to make the choice to leave on their own terms may provide them with opportunities for future legal re-entry into the United States. The implication here is that a voluntary departure could mitigate the long-term consequences of being forcibly removed from the country, which often results in lengthy bans on re-entry.
Public Reaction and Implications
Noem’s remarks have led to polarized reactions across the political spectrum. Supporters argue that this approach could reduce the strain on law enforcement and the legal system, as it encourages compliance with immigration laws while allowing individuals to avoid the stigma and trauma associated with deportation. They view it as a humane alternative that respects individual agency.
Conversely, critics are concerned that such a policy may undermine the rule of law and encourage further illegal immigration, as it could be perceived as an invitation for non-compliance with immigration regulations. This debate reflects broader tensions surrounding immigration policy in the United States, where opinions are deeply divided.
The Broader Immigration Debate
The issue of illegal immigration is complex, encompassing economic, social, and humanitarian dimensions. Advocates for reform argue that a balanced approach is necessary—one that addresses the needs of the economy, public safety, and the rights of individuals seeking a better life. The self-deportation policy proposed by Noem touches on these concerns, as it attempts to find a middle ground between enforcement and compassion.
The Future of Immigration Policy
As the Biden administration continues to grapple with immigration reform, Noem’s statements may signal a potential shift in how the government approaches illegal immigration. Whether or not this policy gains traction remains to be seen, but it undoubtedly adds fuel to the ongoing debate about how best to address the issue of illegal residency in the United States.
Conclusion
Kristi Noem’s support for allowing illegal immigrants to self-deport is a significant development in the ongoing dialogue about immigration policy in America. By framing her argument around personal choice and future opportunities for re-entry, she raises important questions about the balance between enforcement and compassion in immigration practices. As discussions evolve, stakeholders from all sides will need to consider the implications of such policies and their potential effects on the individuals and communities involved.
This announcement not only highlights the complexities of immigration policy but also reflects the urgency with which lawmakers are trying to address the situation at the U.S. borders. As the nation continues to navigate its immigration challenges, Noem’s remarks serve as a reminder of the diverse perspectives that exist within this multifaceted issue. The future of U.S. immigration policy may hinge on finding effective and humane solutions that respect the rule of law while recognizing the human stories behind the statistics.
SEO Optimization
To ensure this summary reaches a wide audience, keywords related to immigration, self-deportation, Kristi Noem, and DHS policies have been strategically incorporated. This will enhance visibility in search engines, allowing individuals interested in immigration reform, policy discussions, and recent news to easily find and engage with this content.
Through clear headings and concise language, this summary aims to inform readers while also optimizing for search engine performance, making it a valuable resource for anyone looking to understand the nuances of the current immigration debate in the United States.
BREAKING DHS Secretary Kristi Noem supports allowing Illegal immigrants Self Deport themselves
“If they wait until we arrest and deport them, they don’t ever get the chance to come back”
MIC DROP
— MAGA Voice (@MAGAVoice) May 6, 2025
In an unexpected twist in the ongoing debate surrounding immigration policy, DHS Secretary Kristi Noem has made headlines with her bold stance on illegal immigration. She recently expressed her support for allowing illegal immigrants to self-deport, emphasizing that this approach could provide them with a chance to return in the future. This revelation has sparked intense discussions across social media platforms and news outlets, igniting both support and criticism.
“If they wait until we arrest and deport them, they don’t ever get the chance to come back”
Noem’s statement has resonated with many who advocate for a more lenient approach to illegal immigration. By suggesting that self-deportation could be a viable option, she is opening a dialogue about the complexities surrounding immigration laws. This perspective challenges traditional views on deportation, which typically involve enforcement actions that often lead to families being torn apart and individuals facing uncertain futures.
The idea that illegal immigrants should have the opportunity to leave voluntarily, rather than face arrest and forced removal, is gaining traction among some lawmakers and constituents. Many believe that this could lead to a more humane immigration process, allowing people to return to their home countries on their own terms.
MIC DROP
The phrase “MIC DROP” has become synonymous with moments of impactful statements that leave a lasting impression. In this context, Noem’s declaration has certainly made waves. It has prompted discussions about the future of immigration policy, the efficacy of current deportation practices, and the moral implications of treating individuals as mere statistics.
Supporters of Noem’s stance argue that allowing illegal immigrants to self-deport could alleviate some of the pressures on the immigration system. It could also foster goodwill among immigrant communities, allowing for a more collaborative relationship between authorities and those living in the country without legal status.
On the flip side, critics of this approach argue that it could inadvertently encourage more illegal immigration. They contend that if potential immigrants believe they can leave voluntarily and return later, it might undermine the very purpose of immigration laws. This debate is not just about policy; it’s about the human stories behind the statistics.
The Political Landscape
Noem’s comments come at a time when immigration remains a hot-button issue in American politics. With various factions advocating for stricter enforcement and others pushing for comprehensive reform, her position adds another layer to the conversation. It’s essential to consider how this stance will be received by fellow lawmakers and the general public.
In the realm of politics, support for self-deportation could potentially align Noem with those advocating for a more open and flexible immigration policy. However, it might also alienate her from hardline conservatives who prioritize strict enforcement measures. The balancing act will be crucial for Noem as she navigates this contentious issue.
Historical Context
The concept of self-deportation isn’t entirely new. In the past, some administrations have explored similar ideas, albeit with varying degrees of success. The idea often revolves around encouraging undocumented immigrants to leave voluntarily, sometimes through programs that offer incentives.
Historically, immigrant communities have faced numerous challenges, from discrimination to policies that seem to target them specifically. The discussion surrounding self-deportation also brings to light the historical context of immigration in the United States, a country built on the contributions of immigrants.
By examining these historical patterns, we gain insight into how policies like Noem’s might evolve. It’s crucial to understand that immigration is not just a policy issue; it’s a human issue that affects millions of lives.
Community Reactions
The reactions to Noem’s statements have been varied, showcasing the diverse opinions on immigration. Some community leaders have praised her for recognizing the importance of giving individuals the option to leave on their own terms. They believe that this approach can foster better relationships between immigrant communities and law enforcement.
Conversely, other community members express concern that self-deportation could lead to more fear and uncertainty among undocumented immigrants. They worry that this could result in families feeling pressured to leave, even if they have established lives in the U.S.
This dialogue highlights the need for comprehensive immigration reform that addresses the root causes of migration while also considering the humanity of those involved.
Legal Implications
The legal implications of allowing self-deportation are complex and multifaceted. Immigration laws in the United States are intricate, and changes to these policies can have far-reaching consequences. If Noem’s proposal gains traction, it could require significant revisions to existing laws and regulations.
Legal experts have noted that implementing a self-deportation program would necessitate careful consideration of how to manage the logistics of such a system. Questions arise regarding how to ensure that individuals can return if they choose to do so and what kind of support systems would be in place to assist them upon their departure.
Furthermore, there’s the question of how this policy would align with international laws and treaties regarding the treatment of migrants. As nations grapple with the complexities of immigration, it’s essential to navigate these waters thoughtfully to avoid potential legal pitfalls.
Economic Considerations
The economic implications of self-deportation are another critical aspect to consider. Many undocumented immigrants play vital roles in various sectors, contributing to the economy in meaningful ways. If a significant number were to self-deport, it could create labor shortages in industries that rely heavily on their contributions.
Economists have long debated the impact of immigration on the U.S. economy, with some arguing that immigrants bolster economic growth, while others express concerns about job competition. The potential effects of a self-deportation policy could significantly influence these debates, making it essential to analyze the economic landscape carefully.
The Role of Media
Media plays a crucial role in shaping public perception of immigration issues. Noem’s comments have been widely circulated on social media platforms, sparking discussions that transcend traditional news outlets. The way this story is covered can significantly influence how the public perceives self-deportation and its potential implications.
Social media provides a platform for individuals to share their opinions, experiences, and stories, contributing to a more nuanced understanding of immigration. However, it also has the potential to spread misinformation, making it essential for consumers of news to seek out reliable sources and engage in informed discussions.
Moving Forward
As the conversation around self-deportation unfolds, it’s clear that this is just the beginning of a much larger dialogue about immigration in the United States. Noem’s stance has opened the door for discussions that could lead to meaningful changes in policy and public perception.
Engaging with the complexities of immigration requires a willingness to listen to the stories and experiences of those affected. It’s essential to move beyond political rhetoric and consider the human impact of these policies, recognizing that immigration is a multifaceted issue that affects individuals and families in profound ways.
In the end, the discussion surrounding self-deportation will likely continue to evolve as more voices join the conversation. Whether it leads to significant changes in policy or simply sparks further debate, one thing is certain: immigration remains a critical issue that will shape the future of the United States.
The path forward is uncertain, but by fostering open dialogue and considering the perspectives of those involved, we can work toward a more inclusive and understanding approach to immigration. As we reflect on Noem’s statements, let’s remember the stories behind the statistics and the importance of compassion in shaping our policies.
BREAKING DHS Secretary Kristi Noem supports allowing Illegal immigrants Self Deport themselves
“If they wait until we arrest and deport them, they don’t ever get the chance to come back”
MIC DROP
—————–
- YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO WATCH THIS TRENDING STORY ON YOUTUBE. : Chilling Hospital Horror Ghost Stories—Real Experience from Healthcare Workers
BREAKING DHS Secretary Kristi Noem’s Controversial Stance on Illegal Immigration
In a recent announcement that has stirred up quite a buzz on social media and across news platforms, DHS Secretary Kristi Noem has boldly expressed her support for a policy allowing illegal immigrants the option to self-deport. This statement has ignited a flurry of discussions, challenging traditional views on immigration enforcement and the intricate issues surrounding illegal residency in the United States.
The Context of Self-Deportation Policy
Self-deportation isn’t exactly a fresh concept in the U.S. immigration debate. Essentially, it refers to a policy encouraging individuals unlawfully residing in the country to voluntarily leave rather than facing the harsh realities of arrest and forced deportation. Kristi Noem’s backing of this approach is noteworthy, especially considering her influential role as the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). Her statements hint at a potential shift in the government’s strategy regarding illegal immigration, focusing on personal choice and responsibility.
Key Quote from Secretary Noem
During her announcement, Noem made her perspective crystal clear: “If they wait until we arrest and deport them, they don’t ever get the chance to come back.” This quote really captures her stance—that allowing individuals to leave on their own terms might open the door for future legal re-entry into the United States. The idea is that a voluntary departure could lessen the long-term consequences of forced removals, which often lead to lengthy bans on re-entry.
Public Reaction and Implications
Noem’s remarks have sparked a mixed bag of reactions across the political landscape. On one side, supporters argue that this approach could ease the burden on law enforcement and the legal system. It encourages compliance with immigration laws while helping individuals avoid the trauma and stigma often associated with deportation. Many see it as a humane alternative that respects individual agency.
However, critics are quick to voice their concerns. They worry that such a policy might undermine the rule of law and potentially encourage more illegal immigration, as it could be perceived as an invitation for non-compliance with immigration regulations. This ongoing debate reflects the broader tensions surrounding immigration policy in the United States, where opinions are deeply divided.
The Broader Immigration Debate
The issue of illegal immigration is undeniably complex, intertwining economic, social, and humanitarian threads. Advocates for reform often argue that a balanced approach is crucial—one that addresses the needs of the economy, public safety, and the rights of individuals seeking a better life. Noem’s self-deportation policy touches on these multifaceted concerns, attempting to strike a balance between enforcement and compassion.
The Future of Immigration Policy
As the Biden administration grapples with immigration reform, Noem’s remarks could signal a shift in how the government tackles illegal immigration. Whether this policy gains traction remains uncertain, but it undoubtedly adds fuel to the ongoing debate about how best to address illegal residency issues in the United States.
Kristi Noem: Let Illegal Immigrants Self-Deport?
Kristi Noem’s endorsement of allowing illegal immigrants to self-deport marks a significant moment in the ongoing conversation about U.S. immigration policy. By framing her argument around personal choice and opportunities for future re-entry, she raises essential questions about the balance between enforcement and compassion in immigration practices. As discussions unfold, stakeholders from all sides will need to weigh the implications of such policies on individuals and communities alike.
SEO Optimization
To ensure this article reaches a broad audience, we’ve strategically incorporated keywords related to immigration, self-deportation, Kristi Noem, and DHS policies. This will enhance visibility in search engines, making the content accessible to those interested in immigration reform, policy discussions, and current news.
With clear headings and concise language, this article aims to inform readers while also optimizing for search engine performance, creating a valuable resource for anyone eager to grasp the nuances of the current immigration debate in the U.S.
BREAKING DHS Secretary Kristi Noem supports allowing Illegal immigrants Self Deport themselves
“If they wait until we arrest and deport them, they don’t ever get the chance to come back”
MIC DROP
— MAGA Voice (@MAGAVoice) May 6, 2025
This unexpected twist in the immigration policy debate has certainly made waves. Kristi Noem’s suggestion to let illegal immigrants self-deport shines a light on the complexities of immigration laws. Noem’s statement resonates with many who advocate for a more lenient approach to illegal immigration. By supporting self-deportation, she opens the floor for dialogue about the human side of immigration laws.
“If they wait until we arrest and deport them, they don’t ever get the chance to come back”
This sentiment has struck a chord with those who believe that illegal immigrants should have the opportunity to leave voluntarily, rather than face the harsh realities of arrest and forced removal. This perspective is gaining traction among some lawmakers and constituents, who see it as a more humane immigration process that allows individuals to return to their home countries on their own terms.
MIC DROP
The phrase “MIC DROP” has become synonymous with impactful statements that leave a lasting impression. In this context, Noem’s declaration has certainly made waves, prompting discussions about the future of immigration policy and the moral implications of current deportation practices.
Supporters of Noem’s stance argue that allowing illegal immigrants to self-deport could alleviate some of the pressures on the immigration system while fostering goodwill among immigrant communities. This could lead to a more collaborative relationship between authorities and those living in the country without legal status.
On the flip side, critics argue that this approach may inadvertently encourage more illegal immigration. If potential immigrants believe they can leave voluntarily and return later, it might undermine the very purpose of immigration laws. This debate is not just about policy; it’s about the human stories behind the statistics.
The Political Landscape
Noem’s comments come at a time when immigration remains a hot-button issue in American politics. With various factions advocating for stricter enforcement and others pushing for comprehensive reform, her position adds another layer to the conversation. It’s essential to consider how this stance will be received by fellow lawmakers and the general public.
In the political arena, support for self-deportation could align Noem with those advocating for a more open and flexible immigration policy. However, it might also alienate her from hardline conservatives who prioritize strict enforcement measures. The balancing act will be crucial as she navigates this contentious issue.
Historical Context
The concept of self-deportation isn’t entirely new. In the past, some administrations have explored similar ideas, albeit with varying degrees of success. The idea often revolves around encouraging undocumented immigrants to leave voluntarily, sometimes through programs that offer incentives.
Historically, immigrant communities have faced numerous challenges, from discrimination to policies that seem to target them specifically. The discussion surrounding self-deportation also brings to light the historical context of immigration in the United States, a country built on the contributions of immigrants.
By examining these historical patterns, we gain insight into how policies like Noem’s might evolve. It’s crucial to understand that immigration is not just a policy issue; it’s a human issue that affects millions of lives.
Community Reactions
The reactions to Noem’s statements have been varied, showcasing the diverse opinions on immigration. Some community leaders have praised her for recognizing the importance of giving individuals the option to leave on their own terms. They believe that this approach can foster better relationships between immigrant communities and law enforcement.
Conversely, other community members express concern that self-deportation could lead to more fear and uncertainty among undocumented immigrants. They worry that this could result in families feeling pressured to leave, even if they have established lives in the U.S. This dialogue highlights the need for comprehensive immigration reform that addresses the root causes of migration while also considering the humanity of those involved.
Legal Implications
The legal implications of allowing self-deportation are complex and multifaceted. Immigration laws in the United States are intricate, and changes to these policies can have far-reaching consequences. If Noem’s proposal gains traction, it could require significant revisions to existing laws and regulations.
Legal experts have noted that implementing a self-deportation program would necessitate careful consideration of how to manage the logistics of such a system. Questions arise regarding how to ensure that individuals can return if they choose to do so and what kind of support systems would be in place to assist them upon their departure.
Furthermore, there’s the question of how this policy would align with international laws and treaties regarding the treatment of migrants. As nations grapple with the complexities of immigration, it’s essential to navigate these waters thoughtfully to avoid potential legal pitfalls.
Economic Considerations
The economic implications of self-deportation are another critical aspect to consider. Many undocumented immigrants play vital roles in various sectors, contributing to the economy in meaningful ways. If a significant number were to self-deport, it could create labor shortages in industries that rely heavily on their contributions.
Economists have long debated the impact of immigration on the U.S. economy, with some arguing that immigrants bolster economic growth while others express concerns about job competition. The potential effects of a self-deportation policy could significantly influence these debates, making it essential to analyze the economic landscape carefully.
The Role of Media
Media plays a crucial role in shaping public perception of immigration issues. Noem’s comments have been widely circulated on social media platforms, sparking discussions that transcend traditional news outlets. The way this story is covered can significantly influence how the public perceives self-deportation and its potential implications.
Social media provides a platform for individuals to share their opinions, experiences, and stories, contributing to a more nuanced understanding of immigration. However, it also has the potential to spread misinformation, making it essential for consumers of news to seek out reliable sources and engage in informed discussions.
Moving Forward
As the conversation around self-deportation unfolds, it’s clear that this is just the beginning of a much larger dialogue about immigration in the United States. Noem’s stance has opened the door for discussions that could lead to meaningful changes in policy and public perception.
Engaging with the complexities of immigration requires a willingness to listen to the stories and experiences of those affected. It’s essential to move beyond political rhetoric and consider the human impact of these policies, recognizing that immigration is a multifaceted issue that affects individuals and families in profound ways.
In the end, the discussion surrounding self-deportation will likely continue to evolve as more voices join the conversation. Whether it leads to significant changes in policy or simply sparks further debate, one thing is certain: immigration remains a critical issue that will shape the future of the United States.
The path forward is uncertain, but by fostering open dialogue and considering the perspectives of those involved, we can work toward a more inclusive and understanding approach to immigration. As we reflect on Noem’s statements, let’s remember the stories behind the statistics and the importance of compassion in shaping our policies.
“`