In a recent tweet, Texas political figure Brian Harrison expressed concerns regarding the actions of the Texas house during the current legislative session. He highlighted three key issues: increased funding for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives, what he termed “gender indoctrination,” and corporate welfare. Harrison’s message resonated with many Texans who feel that the allocation of a reported $24 billion surplus—derived from taxpayers’ contributions—should be directed towards more pressing financial concerns, such as real property tax relief or elimination. Instead, he argues that the current trajectory indicates a betrayal of the public interest.

### Understanding the Context of DEI Funding in Texas

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs have been a focal point of debate across the United States, including Texas. Proponents argue that DEI initiatives foster inclusive workplaces and educational environments, thereby promoting social justice and equality. However, critics, including Harrison, contend that these programs often lead to what they perceive as indoctrination, particularly regarding gender issues. This has sparked a growing divide in public opinion regarding the appropriateness and necessity of such funding.

The Texas House’s decision to increase funding for DEI initiatives has raised eyebrows among constituents who feel that these funds could be better utilized for immediate community needs. For many Texans, the idea of investing taxpayer money into DEI programs feels misplaced, especially when personal financial burdens, such as high property taxes, loom large.

### The Gender Indoctrination Controversy

The term “gender indoctrination” used by Harrison refers to educational policies and practices that incorporate discussions about gender identity and sexual orientation into school curricula. Critics argue that these discussions can confuse or mislead children, while supporters maintain that they are vital for fostering understanding and acceptance in a diverse society.

This controversy has become a heated topic in Texas, as some parents and community members fear that their children’s education is being influenced by ideologies that do not align with their values. Harrison’s tweet suggests that the Texas House’s commitment to funding these programs is a significant concern for those who prioritize traditional educational values.

### Corporate Welfare: A Drain on Public Resources?

In addition to DEI initiatives and gender discussions, Harrison pointed to the issue of corporate welfare. This term refers to government policies that provide financial assistance to businesses through subsidies, tax breaks, and other incentives. Critics argue that such practices often favor large corporations at the expense of small businesses and individual taxpayers.

Harrison’s claim that a substantial portion of the $24 billion surplus would be allocated to corporate welfare raises questions about the efficacy and fairness of such expenditures. Many Texans are concerned that instead of investing in community needs such as education, healthcare, and infrastructure, their tax dollars are being funneled into corporate interests that do not necessarily align with the broader public good.

### The $24 Billion Surplus: A Missed Opportunity for Tax Relief

The $24 billion surplus mentioned by Harrison is a significant sum, and its management has become a focal point for many Texas residents. With the state enjoying a budget surplus, many Texans anticipated that this would lead to meaningful tax relief, particularly in the form of property tax reductions. Property taxes in Texas have been a burden for many homeowners, and the expectation was that the surplus could alleviate some of this financial strain.

However, Harrison suggests that the current legislative priorities indicate a troubling trend where funds are directed away from tax relief and instead allocated to programs that he believes do not serve the best interests of the public. This has led to feelings of betrayal among constituents who expected their representatives to prioritize their financial well-being over ideological initiatives.

### The Call for Accountability and Change

Harrison’s message is not just a critique of current funding allocations; it is also a call for accountability among Texas lawmakers. He urges residents to remain vigilant and advocate for their interests in light of what he sees as misguided priorities. The sentiment expressed in his tweet reflects a broader frustration among voters who feel that their concerns are not being adequately addressed by their elected officials.

Texans are encouraged to engage in the legislative process, voice their opinions, and hold their representatives accountable for the decisions they make with public funds. This engagement is crucial for ensuring that the needs and desires of the constituents are reflected in policy decisions.

### Conclusion: Navigating the Future of Texas Policy

As Texas continues to navigate complex social and economic issues, the conversations surrounding DEI funding, gender education, corporate welfare, and tax relief will likely remain at the forefront. The debate highlights the need for a balanced approach to governance—one that addresses both ideological objectives and the practical financial concerns of the populace.

Brian Harrison’s tweet serves as a reminder for Texans to stay informed about legislative decisions and to advocate for a future where taxpayer dollars are spent in a manner that reflects the values and needs of the community. Public discourse around these issues is essential for fostering an informed electorate that can influence policy for the betterment of all citizens.

In summary, as the Texas House moves forward with its legislative agenda, the implications of its funding decisions will continue to shape the landscape of Texas politics and public sentiment. The call for transparency, accountability, and a focus on taxpayer interests will be critical as discussions evolve in the coming months.

Good morning, Texas.

This session the Texas House has increased funding for DEI, gender indoctrination, and corporate welfare.

And the $24 billion “surplus” of YOUR money will be used to fund it.

That means real property tax relief/elimination is unlikely.

Betrayal!

— Brian Harrison (@brianeharrison) April 29, 2025

Good morning, Texas.

Hey there, Texas! It’s a bright new day, and there’s a lot to talk about regarding what’s happening in our beloved state. As much as we love our Lone Star State, sometimes the news can be a bit disheartening. Recently, the Texas House has made some significant decisions that have stirred up a conversation across the state. Let’s dive into what’s been happening and why it matters to you.

This session the Texas House has increased funding for DEI, gender indoctrination, and corporate welfare.

First up, let’s break down what exactly has been approved. The Texas House has decided to allocate more funds toward Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives, gender education, and what many are calling corporate welfare. If you’re wondering why this is a big deal, you’re not alone. Many Texans are scratching their heads and asking how these funding choices will impact their lives.

The increased funding for DEI initiatives aims to create a more inclusive environment in schools, workplaces, and communities. However, critics argue that the term “gender indoctrination” raises serious concerns about what is being taught in classrooms and how it affects our children. Is this really what’s best for our kids? The debate is heated, and many parents and community members are feeling left out of the conversation.

Corporate welfare is another buzzword that gets people fired up. The idea is that taxpayer money is being used to support large corporations instead of investing in local businesses and communities. This raises a critical question: should taxpayers be footing the bill for big companies? Many say no, believing that funding should go directly to the people who need it most—like families struggling to make ends meet.

And the $24 billion “surplus” of YOUR money will be used to fund it.

Now, let’s talk about the elephant in the room—the $24 billion surplus of YOUR money. Yes, you read that right. Texas has a significant surplus, and the government has decided to allocate a substantial chunk of it to the initiatives mentioned above. It’s hard not to feel a bit frustrated when you think about the potential for using that surplus to provide real property tax relief or even to improve public services.

Imagine what could be done with that kind of money! Schools could be better funded, roads could be repaired, and healthcare services could be expanded. Instead, many Texans are feeling like their hard-earned tax dollars are being spent on programs that don’t directly benefit them.

This situation begs the question: is it a betrayal of trust? When you think about your tax dollars, you want to see them used for the greater good. Yet, with the current funding choices, many feel that the priorities of the Texas House don’t align with the needs of everyday Texans. It’s a tough pill to swallow, and it’s a sentiment that’s resonating throughout the state.

That means real property tax relief/elimination is unlikely.

Speaking of priorities, let’s address the issue of property taxes. With such a significant surplus at hand, many were hopeful for some real property tax relief or even complete elimination. Unfortunately, it seems that the focus on funding DEI initiatives, gender education, and corporate welfare means that this relief is unlikely to happen.

Property taxes can be a massive burden for families, especially in a state where housing prices are on the rise. Many Texans are already feeling the pinch, and the hope for relief is fading fast. The decision to prioritize other funding areas over property tax relief leaves many feeling neglected and frustrated.

Imagine a family trying to make ends meet, only to find that their property taxes are increasing while the state chooses to fund initiatives that they may not agree with. It’s a tough situation that’s leading to a lot of dissatisfaction among residents.

Betrayal!

So, what’s the takeaway from all of this? Many Texans feel a sense of betrayal regarding how their tax dollars are being spent. It’s understandable to want to create a more inclusive society, but at what cost? When the basic needs of families are overlooked in favor of initiatives that some see as controversial, it raises serious questions about the government’s priorities.

It’s essential for all Texans to engage in this conversation. The decisions made today will impact not only our lives but also the lives of future generations. If you’re feeling frustrated, you’re not alone. It’s crucial to stay informed and voice your opinions to your representatives.

You can make your voice heard by contacting your local representatives and sharing your thoughts. After all, it’s your tax dollars that are being spent, and you deserve to have a say in how they are utilized.

Whether you support DEI initiatives or are concerned about what’s being taught in schools, having a discussion about these topics is vital. The future of Texas should reflect the values and needs of its residents.

In the end, staying engaged and informed will empower all of us to shape the future we want to see in Texas. While the current situation may feel disheartening, it’s important to remember that change is possible when we come together as a community. So, let’s keep the conversation going and work toward a Texas that truly serves all its citizens.

By staying informed and active in local governance, Texans can ensure that their voices are heard and that their needs are prioritized in the future. Let’s advocate for a Texas that reflects our values and invests in the well-being of its residents.