In a recent tweet, Gaurav Gogoi questioned the BJP’s stance on allowing Namaz on roads while supporting the Waqf Bill. He raised the issue of blocking public spaces for religious activities and highlighted the hypocrisy in labeling it as “empowerment.” Gogoi pointed out the communal undertones in this selective outrage and questioned when law and order became a communal issue.

The tweet also mentioned that the Special Investigation Team (SIT) is investigating Gogoi’s wife’s connection to Islamabad, hinting at possible frustration or ulterior motives behind the BJP’s actions. This tweet by The Analyzer (News Updates) sheds light on the political dynamics surrounding religious practices and public spaces in India.

The issue of allowing Namaz on roads has been a contentious one in India, with some political parties and groups arguing for the right to practice one’s religion in public spaces, while others raise concerns about disruptions and the misuse of public areas for religious activities. The Waqf Bill, which the BJP supports, aims to regulate and manage Waqf properties in India, but critics like Gogoi question the party’s motives in supporting this bill while also restricting other religious practices in public spaces.

Gogoi’s questioning of the BJP’s stance reflects a larger debate in India about the balance between religious freedom and public order. The tweet highlights the need for a nuanced approach to such issues, considering both religious sentiments and the rights of all citizens to access public spaces without hindrance.

The reference to the SIT probe into Gogoi’s wife’s Islamabad connection adds another layer to the tweet, suggesting possible political motivations behind the BJP’s actions regarding religious practices. This insinuation of frustration or ulterior motives on the part of the BJP raises questions about the party’s commitment to upholding the rule of law and ensuring a fair and just society for all citizens.

Overall, this tweet by The Analyzer (News Updates) captures the complexity of the political landscape in India, where issues of religion, public spaces, and law and order intersect. It calls for a deeper examination of the underlying motivations behind political actions and highlights the importance of upholding principles of fairness and equality in governance. As the debate continues, it is essential for all stakeholders to engage in constructive dialogue and work towards solutions that respect the rights and beliefs of all communities.

Gaurav Gogoi questions BJP for not allowing NAMAZ on ROADS but backing the #WaqfBill.
~ So, blocking public spaces is “Empowerment” now? Since when did law & order become a COMMUNAL issue? Selective outrage

SIT is probing his wife’s Islamabad connection. Frustration? pic.twitter.com/Ebve9mkIDS

— The Analyzer (News Updates) (@Indian_Analyzer) April 2, 2025

In a recent Twitter post, Gaurav Gogoi raised an important question regarding the BJP’s stance on public spaces and religious practices. The tweet highlighted the contrasting views of the BJP, which prohibits NAMAZ on roads while supporting the #WaqfBill. This action raises questions about the government’s approach to law and order, as well as the potential for communal tensions to arise.

Gaurav Gogoi Questions BJP’s Policy
Gaurav Gogoi’s tweet sheds light on the BJP’s contradictory stance on public spaces and religious practices. By questioning why NAMAZ is not allowed on roads while backing the #WaqfBill, Gogoi is highlighting the inconsistencies in the government’s approach. This raises concerns about the government’s commitment to upholding law and order in a fair and unbiased manner.

Blocking Public Spaces: A Form of Empowerment?
The tweet also raises the important question of whether blocking public spaces is considered a form of "empowerment" by the BJP. By restricting certain religious practices while supporting specific bills, the government may inadvertently be empowering one group over another. This selective outrage could lead to further divisions within society and undermine the principles of equality and freedom.

Law and Order as a Communal Issue
The tweet also questions when law and order became a communal issue in India. By allowing political considerations to influence decisions related to public spaces and religious practices, the government risks politicizing law enforcement and undermining the rule of law. This could have far-reaching implications for social harmony and the protection of individual rights.

Selective Outrage and Double Standards
The tweet’s mention of "selective outrage" highlights the double standards that may exist within the government’s policies. By prioritizing certain religious practices over others, the government may be sending a message of favoritism and discrimination. This can erode trust in the government and lead to increased polarization within society.

SIT Investigation into Islamabad Connection
The tweet also alludes to a possible connection between Gaurav Gogoi’s wife and Islamabad, hinting at a deeper investigation by the SIT. This reference raises questions about the motivations behind the government’s actions and whether personal vendettas are driving policy decisions. The mention of frustration suggests that there may be ulterior motives at play in the government’s stance on public spaces and religious practices.

In Conclusion
Gaurav Gogoi’s tweet serves as a reminder of the importance of upholding the principles of equality, freedom, and justice in a democratic society. By questioning the government’s policies on public spaces and religious practices, Gogoi is drawing attention to the need for transparency, accountability, and fairness in governance. As citizens, it is essential to remain vigilant and hold our leaders accountable for their actions, especially when they have the potential to impact our fundamental rights and freedoms.