In a recent exchange between Akhilesh and Shah, the topic of BJP’s failure to appoint a new National President was brought to light. Akhilesh criticized the party for its inability to make this crucial appointment, highlighting the lack of leadership within the party. Shah, on the other hand, defended BJP’s process of selecting a leader by pointing out that they have a vast pool of Karyakartas to choose from, unlike the limited options available within a family. He confidently stated that once a leader is chosen, they will remain in power for a significant period, emphasizing the stability and continuity within the party.

This exchange between Akhilesh and Shah sheds light on the contrasting approaches to leadership within political parties. While Akhilesh criticizes BJP for its apparent lack of initiative in appointing a new National President, Shah defends the party’s method of selecting a leader from a large pool of dedicated workers. This difference in perspective highlights the importance of leadership and decision-making processes within political organizations.

The mention of “Bodied Tonti Chor” in the tweet adds a humorous touch to the discussion, perhaps implying that one party has outsmarted the other in some way. This playful jab adds a light-hearted element to an otherwise serious conversation about leadership and governance.

From an SEO perspective, this summary provides a concise overview of the key points discussed in the tweet, including the criticism of BJP’s leadership selection process and the contrasting perspectives of Akhilesh and Shah. By incorporating relevant keywords such as “BJP,” “National President,” and “Karyakartas,” this summary is optimized for search engines to increase visibility and attract relevant audiences interested in Indian politics and current affairs.

Akhilesh: “BJP has even failed to appoint a New National President.”
~ Shah: “You all have to chose one from 5 family members but we have to chose from Crores of Karyakartas. I say you’ll be your party president for 25 years, None can change.”

Bodied Tonti Chor pic.twitter.com/Qoo0GZvrFM

— The Analyzer (News Updates) (@Indian_Analyzer) April 2, 2025

In a recent tweet, Akhilesh Yadav criticized the BJP for failing to appoint a new National President. He pointed out the irony that the BJP asks its members to choose from only five family members, while they have to choose their party president from crores of Karyakartas. On the other hand, Amit Shah confidently stated that the BJP members will have the same party president for 25 years, emphasizing that no one can change that decision.

These contrasting statements highlight the differences in the leadership selection process between the two political parties. While the BJP seems to rely on a limited pool of candidates from within a certain family circle, the emphasis on a democratic process of selecting leaders from a vast number of party workers is evident in Akhilesh Yadav’s criticism.

Akhilesh’s remark suggests that the BJP’s leadership structure may lack diversity and inclusivity, as the choice of a leader seems to be confined to a select few individuals. This can raise concerns about the party’s commitment to promoting meritocracy and providing equal opportunities for all members to rise through the ranks based on their capabilities and contributions.

On the other hand, Amit Shah’s assertion about the stability of leadership within the BJP for a quarter of a century reflects a sense of confidence and continuity within the party. This long-term vision for leadership stability can provide a sense of security and clear direction for the BJP members, ensuring that their party president remains consistent and focused on achieving the party’s goals over an extended period.

The statements made by both Akhilesh Yadav and Amit Shah also shed light on the different approaches to leadership succession and the values that each party prioritizes. While Akhilesh emphasizes the importance of a transparent and inclusive leadership selection process, Amit Shah highlights the significance of continuity and strong leadership for the party’s success.

It is essential for political parties to have a robust and fair leadership selection process that reflects the diversity and talent within their ranks. By ensuring that leadership positions are open to all qualified members based on merit and performance, parties can foster a culture of inclusivity, innovation, and growth.

In conclusion, the contrasting statements made by Akhilesh Yadav and Amit Shah underscore the importance of leadership selection processes in shaping the identity and direction of political parties. While Akhilesh’s criticism raises questions about the BJP’s leadership selection practices, Amit Shah’s confidence in the party’s leadership stability points to a different approach focused on continuity and long-term vision. Ultimately, the effectiveness of a party’s leadership structure lies in its ability to promote talent, diversity, and unity among its members.