In a recent development, US Citizenship & Immigration Services (USCIS) has announced that it will no longer participate in naturalization ceremonies held in sanctuary jurisdictions as a form of retaliation. This decision comes as a response to sanctuary jurisdictions that have policies in place to limit cooperation with federal immigration authorities.

The news was first reported by Bill Melugin on Twitter, who shared an email sent out by USCIS leadership to field offices across the country. The email stated that USCIS will no longer be involved in naturalization ceremonies held in sanctuary jurisdictions, which are areas that have policies designed to protect undocumented immigrants from deportation.

This decision by USCIS marks a significant shift in the agency’s approach to naturalization ceremonies and highlights the ongoing tensions between federal immigration authorities and sanctuary jurisdictions. The move is likely to have far-reaching implications for immigrants seeking to become US citizens, as naturalization ceremonies are a key step in the citizenship process.

The decision to boycott naturalization ceremonies in sanctuary jurisdictions is likely to be met with mixed reactions. Supporters of the move may argue that it is necessary to enforce immigration laws and prevent sanctuary jurisdictions from undermining federal authority. On the other hand, critics may view the decision as punitive and discriminatory towards immigrants living in sanctuary jurisdictions.

It is important to note that naturalization ceremonies are symbolic events that mark the culmination of the citizenship process for immigrants. These ceremonies are typically held in venues such as courthouses, community centers, and schools, and provide new citizens with a sense of pride and belonging in their new country.

The decision by USCIS to boycott naturalization ceremonies in sanctuary jurisdictions raises questions about the agency’s role in the immigration system and its relationship with local jurisdictions. It also underscores the broader debate over immigration policy and the rights of undocumented immigrants in the United States.

As the situation continues to unfold, it will be important to monitor how sanctuary jurisdictions respond to USCIS’s decision and how it impacts immigrant communities across the country. The move is likely to spark further debate and controversy over the role of federal immigration authorities and the rights of immigrants in sanctuary jurisdictions.

In conclusion, USCIS’s decision to boycott naturalization ceremonies in sanctuary jurisdictions is a significant development in the ongoing debate over immigration policy in the United States. The move is likely to have far-reaching implications for immigrants seeking to become US citizens and will undoubtedly spark further debate and controversy in the coming weeks and months.

SCOOP: In retaliation to sanctuary jurisdictions, US Citizenship & Immigration Services (USCIS) will no longer participate in naturalization ceremonies held in venues in sanctuary jurisdictions, per an email sent out by USCIS leadership to field offices across the country this…

— Bill Melugin (@BillMelugin_) March 31, 2025

In recent news, it has been revealed that US Citizenship & Immigration Services (USCIS) will no longer be participating in naturalization ceremonies held in venues located within sanctuary jurisdictions. This decision comes as a response to sanctuary jurisdictions that have policies in place to limit cooperation with federal immigration enforcement.

The email sent out by USCIS leadership to field offices across the country outlines the agency’s stance on this matter. Sanctuary jurisdictions, which typically have policies in place to protect undocumented immigrants from deportation, have been a point of contention between federal and local authorities for some time now.

Sanctuary cities and states have been a hot topic in the immigration debate, with supporters arguing that they provide a safe haven for undocumented immigrants who may otherwise face deportation. On the other hand, opponents argue that these policies hinder federal efforts to enforce immigration laws and keep communities safe.

The decision by USCIS to no longer participate in naturalization ceremonies in sanctuary jurisdictions is seen as a way to push back against these policies. By refusing to hold these ceremonies in venues within sanctuary cities and states, USCIS is sending a clear message about its stance on cooperation with local authorities.

This move has sparked debate among immigration advocates, who argue that naturalization ceremonies should be a non-political event that celebrates the achievements of new citizens. By choosing to take a stand on this issue, USCIS is inserting itself into the larger debate over immigration policy and enforcement.

It is important to note that this decision by USCIS does not affect the naturalization process itself. Eligible immigrants will still be able to apply for citizenship and go through the necessary steps to become naturalized. However, the location of the naturalization ceremonies may change as a result of this new policy.

This development highlights the ongoing tensions between federal immigration authorities and sanctuary jurisdictions. As the debate over immigration policy continues to heat up, it is likely that we will see more actions taken by both sides to assert their positions on this contentious issue.

In conclusion, the decision by USCIS to no longer participate in naturalization ceremonies held in sanctuary jurisdictions is a significant development in the ongoing debate over immigration policy. This move underscores the agency’s stance on cooperation with sanctuary cities and states, and is likely to have far-reaching implications for how naturalization ceremonies are conducted in the future.