The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is finalizing plans to assist Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in locating illegal aliens ordered for deportation by verifying information through tax records. This unexpected partnership between the IRS and ICE has raised concerns among many Americans who never thought the IRS would be on the side of immigration enforcement.

The news of this collaboration was shared by Tom Homan, the Border Czar of Rapid Response News, on Twitter. In his tweet, Homan highlighted the IRS’s involvement in assisting ICE in locating and deporting illegal aliens. This revelation has sparked a debate about the role of the IRS in immigration enforcement and raised questions about privacy and data-sharing.

Many people are surprised by the IRS’s decision to work with ICE, as the agency is typically associated with tax collection and enforcement, not immigration enforcement. The idea that tax records could be used to identify and locate individuals for deportation has raised concerns about the potential misuse of taxpayer information and the violation of privacy rights.

While the details of the collaboration between the IRS and ICE are still being finalized, it is clear that this partnership represents a significant shift in the relationship between the two agencies. The IRS’s involvement in immigration enforcement raises questions about the boundaries between tax collection and law enforcement and the extent to which government agencies can share information for enforcement purposes.

Critics of the IRS-ICE partnership argue that using tax records to identify and locate illegal aliens for deportation could have serious consequences for individuals and families. They point out that many undocumented immigrants pay taxes using Individual Taxpayer Identification Numbers (ITINs) and fear that their tax information could be used against them in immigration enforcement.

Proponents of the collaboration argue that using tax records to verify information and locate individuals for deportation is a legitimate use of government resources. They believe that enforcing immigration laws is essential for national security and public safety and that the IRS’s assistance in this effort is justified.

As the IRS and ICE move forward with their plans to collaborate on immigration enforcement, it is clear that this partnership will continue to be a topic of debate and discussion. The implications of using tax records for immigration enforcement raise important questions about privacy, data sharing, and the role of government agencies in enforcing the law.

In conclusion, the news of the IRS’s involvement in assisting ICE in locating illegal aliens for deportation through tax records has sparked controversy and raised important questions about the boundaries between tax collection and law enforcement. As this partnership moves forward, it will be crucial to consider the implications for privacy rights, data sharing, and the role of government agencies in immigration enforcement.

New: Ever thought the IRS would be on your side, America?

Well it’s confirmed, the Internal Revenue Service is finalizing plans to assist ICE in locating illegal aliens ordered for deportation by verifying information through tax records! pic.twitter.com/BXTypRU9S8

— Tom Homan – Border Czar Rapid Response News (@TomHoman_) March 29, 2025

The recent collaboration between the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has sparked a wave of controversy and concern across the United States. In a surprising turn of events, the IRS has announced plans to assist ICE in locating illegal aliens who have been ordered for deportation by cross-referencing tax records. This unprecedented partnership has raised questions about privacy, ethics, and the role of government agencies in enforcing immigration laws.

The news was first reported by Tom Homan, the Border Czar of Rapid Response News, who tweeted about the IRS’s decision to support ICE in their efforts to track down undocumented immigrants. The tweet quickly went viral, with many Americans expressing shock and disbelief that the IRS, an agency responsible for collecting taxes, would be involved in immigration enforcement.

The move by the IRS to assist ICE has raised concerns about the potential misuse of taxpayer information for immigration purposes. Many critics argue that the IRS should not be sharing sensitive tax records with other government agencies, especially those involved in immigration enforcement. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has already expressed strong opposition to the collaboration, citing privacy and due process concerns.

Proponents of the partnership argue that it is necessary to prevent undocumented immigrants from exploiting the tax system and evading deportation. They believe that by sharing tax information with ICE, the IRS can help identify individuals who are not complying with immigration laws and hold them accountable for their actions. However, opponents argue that this approach could lead to widespread fear and distrust among immigrant communities, discouraging them from filing taxes or seeking assistance from government agencies.

The decision by the IRS to support ICE in locating illegal aliens has reignited the debate over immigration policy and enforcement in the United States. While some believe that cracking down on undocumented immigrants is necessary to protect national security and uphold the rule of law, others argue that it is cruel and inhumane to target vulnerable populations for deportation.

In response to the backlash, the IRS has defended its partnership with ICE, stating that it is committed to upholding the law and ensuring that all taxpayers comply with their obligations. The agency has emphasized that it will only share information with ICE in cases where there is a legitimate law enforcement need and that all data will be handled in accordance with strict privacy protocols.

The controversy surrounding the IRS’s collaboration with ICE highlights the complex and often contentious nature of immigration policy in the United States. As the debate continues to unfold, it is clear that the issue of immigration enforcement will remain a hot-button issue for years to come.

In conclusion, the decision by the IRS to assist ICE in locating illegal aliens has sparked a fierce debate about the role of government agencies in immigration enforcement. While some believe that the partnership is necessary to uphold the rule of law, others argue that it raises serious privacy and ethical concerns. As the controversy continues to unfold, it is clear that the issue of immigration enforcement will remain a divisive and contentious topic in American politics.