The tweet shared by Katherine Deves Morgan on March 30, 2025, presents a controversial opinion regarding the Racial Discrimination Act 1979 in Australia. The tweet suggests that the act should be repealed, and the role of the Race Discrimination Commissioner should be scrapped. According to the tweet, many Australians welcomed migrants in the past who came to the country to work hard and embrace the Australian way of life.

The Racial Discrimination Act 1979 is a crucial piece of legislation that aims to promote equality and eliminate discrimination based on race, color, descent, or national or ethnic origin. The act provides a legal framework to address racial discrimination and ensure that individuals are treated fairly and equally regardless of their background.

The Race Discrimination Commissioner is a key role within the Australian Human Rights Commission, responsible for promoting understanding, tolerance, and acceptance of diversity in the community. The commissioner works to address issues of racial discrimination, prejudice, and inequality, and advocates for the rights of individuals from diverse backgrounds.

The tweet’s suggestion to repeal the Racial Discrimination Act 1979 and scrap the role of the Race Discrimination Commissioner is a contentious one that raises important questions about the approach to racial equality and discrimination in Australia. The tweet implies that the act and the commissioner’s role are no longer necessary, as they may have outlived their usefulness or are perceived as ineffective in addressing current challenges.

It is essential to consider the historical context and ongoing struggles against racial discrimination and inequality in Australia. While progress has been made in promoting multiculturalism and diversity, issues of racism, prejudice, and discrimination persist in society. Repealing the Racial Discrimination Act and eliminating the Race Discrimination Commissioner role could have serious implications for the protection of individuals’ rights and the promotion of racial equality.

The tweet’s argument that many Australians welcomed migrants in the past overlooks the complexities of the immigrant experience and the challenges faced by individuals from diverse backgrounds. While it is true that migrant communities have made significant contributions to Australian society, it is essential to recognize the ongoing barriers and discrimination that many individuals face based on their race or ethnicity.

In conclusion, the tweet shared by Katherine Deves Morgan raises important questions about the approach to racial equality and discrimination in Australia. The suggestion to repeal the Racial Discrimination Act 1979 and scrap the role of the Race Discrimination Commissioner is a contentious one that requires careful consideration of the implications for individuals’ rights and the promotion of diversity and inclusion in society. It is essential to continue the dialogue on racial equality and work towards a more inclusive and equitable society for all Australians.

Controversial Opinion

The Racial Discrimination Act 1979 should be repealed & the Race Discrimination Commissioner role should be scrapped

Up until several decades ago, many Australians welcomed the millions of migrants who came here to work hard & embrace Australian… pic.twitter.com/iM5WVrQBN8

— Katherine Deves Morgan (@deves_katherine) March 30, 2025

In a recent controversial opinion shared on Twitter by Katherine Deves Morgan, there is a call to repeal the Racial Discrimination Act 1979 and scrap the role of the Race Discrimination Commissioner. This statement has sparked a heated debate among Australians, with strong opinions on both sides of the issue.

The Racial Discrimination Act 1979 was implemented to promote equality and eliminate discrimination based on race, color, descent, or national or ethnic origin. It has been a cornerstone of Australia’s efforts to create a more inclusive and tolerant society. However, some argue that the Act is outdated and no longer serves its intended purpose.

Many Australians have welcomed migrants who have come to the country to work hard and embrace the Australian way of life. These migrants have contributed greatly to the cultural diversity and economic prosperity of Australia. However, there are those who believe that the Act hinders free speech and prevents honest discussions about important issues related to race and immigration.

Those in favor of repealing the Act argue that it is time to move away from policies that focus on differences and instead embrace a more unified and inclusive approach. They believe that by repealing the Act, Australia can foster a more open and honest dialogue about race without the fear of legal repercussions.

On the other hand, opponents of repealing the Act argue that it is essential for protecting the rights of minority groups and preventing discrimination in all forms. They believe that the Act is a crucial tool in combating racism and promoting equality for all Australians.

The role of the Race Discrimination Commissioner is also a point of contention in this debate. Some argue that the Commissioner’s position is redundant and that the resources allocated to this role could be better utilized elsewhere. Others believe that the Commissioner plays a vital role in advocating for the rights of marginalized communities and ensuring that Australia remains committed to combating racism and discrimination.

It is important to consider the implications of repealing the Racial Discrimination Act 1979 and scrapping the role of the Race Discrimination Commissioner. While some may see these actions as a step towards a more open and honest dialogue about race, others may view them as a threat to the rights and protections of minority groups.

In conclusion, the debate over the Racial Discrimination Act 1979 and the role of the Race Discrimination Commissioner is complex and multifaceted. It is essential for Australians to engage in thoughtful and respectful discussions about these issues in order to find a path forward that promotes equality, inclusivity, and respect for all individuals.