Judge James Boasberg, who has recently been assigned to the SignalGate case, has a long history of involvement in high-profile cases related to the deep state. This includes being a FISA Court Judge during the issuance of the Carter Page FISA warrant and reviewing and approving James Comey’s memos. Boasberg’s track record in cases involving the Trump administration has raised questions about his impartiality and potential bias.

Boasberg’s involvement in the Tren de Aragua Deportation Case and now the SignalGate case marks his fourth case related to the Trump administration. This pattern of assignments to cases involving the deep state has led some to question Boasberg’s role as a go-to judge for the establishment.

• Check out these discounted items on TikTok

In the Tren de Aragua Deportation Case, Boasberg ruled in favor of the deportation of Venezuelan nationals accused of involvement in a violent gang. His decision was seen as controversial by some, as it raised concerns about the treatment of immigrants and the use of deportation as a tool for political gain.

Now, with his assignment to the SignalGate case, Boasberg’s reputation as a judge with ties to the deep state is under scrutiny once again. The SignalGate case involves allegations of government surveillance abuse and potential violations of civil liberties. Boasberg’s involvement in this case raises questions about his ability to remain impartial and uphold the principles of justice.

Boasberg’s past involvement in high-profile cases, such as the issuance of the Carter Page FISA warrant and the review of James Comey’s memos, further compounds concerns about his impartiality. These cases have been central to the ongoing investigations into possible misconduct within the government and law enforcement agencies.

As Judge Boasberg navigates his fourth case related to the Trump administration, his decisions and rulings will be closely scrutinized. The outcome of the SignalGate case, in particular, will have far-reaching implications for the future of government surveillance and civil liberties.

In conclusion, Judge James Boasberg’s history of involvement in cases related to the deep state raises questions about his impartiality and potential bias. His track record in cases involving the Trump administration has drawn scrutiny, and his assignment to the SignalGate case will be closely watched. As the legal proceedings unfold, the public will be looking to Boasberg to uphold the principles of justice and ensure a fair and unbiased outcome.

Judge James Boasberg (Tren de Aragua Deportation Case and just “assigned” to SignalGate case—his 4th Trump Case) has a long history of being a go-to judge for the deep state:

1) FISA Court Judge during issuance of Carter Page FISA

2) Reviewed/Approved James Comey’s memos prior… https://t.co/S42ogYSOce

— Jeff Carlson (@themarketswork) March 28, 2025

Judge James Boasberg is a name that has been making headlines recently, particularly in relation to his involvement in high-profile cases such as the Tren de Aragua Deportation Case and the SignalGate case, which happens to be his fourth Trump case. But who is Judge James Boasberg, and why is he considered a go-to judge for the deep state?

### FISA Court Judge during issuance of Carter Page FISA

One of the key aspects of Judge Boasberg’s career that has drawn attention is his role as a FISA Court Judge during the issuance of the Carter Page FISA. The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, commonly known as the FISA Court, plays a crucial role in overseeing requests for surveillance warrants against foreign spies inside the United States. Judge Boasberg’s involvement in this process has raised questions about his impartiality and his connections to the deep state.

### Reviewed/Approved James Comey’s Memos

Another significant event in Judge Boasberg’s career is his review and approval of James Comey’s memos. James Comey, the former FBI director, famously documented his interactions with President Trump in a series of memos that detailed their conversations. Judge Boasberg’s role in reviewing and approving these memos has led to speculation about his alignment with certain political interests and his potential bias in high-profile cases.

### The Tren de Aragua Deportation Case

The Tren de Aragua Deportation Case is yet another example of Judge Boasberg’s involvement in controversial legal proceedings. This case involves the deportation of individuals connected to a notorious criminal organization in Venezuela. Judge Boasberg’s handling of this case has raised concerns about his approach to immigration and national security issues, as well as his relationship with government agencies.

### SignalGate Case

The SignalGate case, which is the fourth Trump case that Judge Boasberg has been assigned to, is a recent development that has further fueled speculation about his role in the legal system. The case involves allegations of misconduct and abuse of power within the government, with implications for national security and the rule of law. Judge Boasberg’s involvement in this case has prompted questions about his objectivity and his ability to uphold justice without bias.

In conclusion, Judge James Boasberg’s long history of being a go-to judge for the deep state raises important questions about the integrity of the legal system and the independence of the judiciary. His involvement in high-profile cases such as the Tren de Aragua Deportation Case and the SignalGate case has sparked debate about his connections to political interests and his commitment to upholding the law. As these cases continue to unfold, it will be crucial to closely monitor Judge Boasberg’s decisions and actions to ensure that justice is served fairly and impartially.