The tweet from Shipwreck on Twitter criticizes the need for a federal congress to get things done, highlighting the high salary of congress members in comparison to what seems like part-time work. The tweet suggests that congress members often grandstand, make outrageous statements to get media attention, or write strongly worded letters without actually achieving anything substantial.

The tweet raises important questions about the effectiveness and efficiency of the federal congress in the United States. It points out the disconnect between the high salaries of congress members and the perceived lack of tangible results from their work. The tweet implies that congress members may be more focused on self-promotion and media attention than on actually passing laws and making meaningful changes.

The criticism in the tweet reflects a larger debate about the role of government and the effectiveness of the political system. It raises concerns about the accountability and productivity of elected officials and questions whether the current system is truly serving the interests of the public.

Overall, Shipwreck’s tweet highlights the need for a closer examination of the functioning of the federal congress and calls for greater transparency and accountability in the political process. It challenges us to rethink the role of government and how we can ensure that elected officials are truly working in the best interests of the people they represent.

I’ll die on the hill that we don’t need a federal congress to get things done.

$175,000 – $223,500 a year to work what looks like part-time hours. To grandstand saying ridiculous things so they can be on the news or write strongly worded letters but never actually get anything… pic.twitter.com/LoLsMjaoPG

— Shipwreck (@shipwreckshow) March 29, 2025

In a recent tweet, Shipwreck expressed a strong opinion about the federal congress, suggesting that we don’t need it to get things done. The tweet highlights the high salaries of congress members, ranging from $175,000 to $223,500 a year, for what appears to be part-time work. Shipwreck criticizes the tendency of some congress members to grandstand, making outrageous statements to attract media attention or writing strongly worded letters without actually achieving any tangible results.

It’s not uncommon for people to question the effectiveness of the federal congress, given the polarized nature of politics and the gridlock that often occurs in legislative processes. The tweet raises valid points about the disconnect between the high salaries of congress members and the perceived lack of productivity in terms of passing meaningful legislation and addressing key issues facing the country.

While it’s essential to have a system of checks and balances in government, some may argue that the current structure of the federal congress is not as efficient as it could be. The tweet suggests that there may be alternative ways to achieve the desired outcomes without the need for a federal congress, pointing to the high costs associated with maintaining the institution.

One potential solution could be to explore more direct forms of democracy, such as town hall meetings, citizen assemblies, or online voting platforms. These mechanisms could potentially empower citizens to have a more direct say in decision-making processes and bypass the traditional legislative channels that seem to be bogged down by bureaucracy and partisanship.

It’s important to note that the views expressed in the tweet are just one perspective on the issue. There are valid arguments on both sides of the debate about the role and function of the federal congress. Ultimately, the effectiveness of any political system depends on the engagement and participation of its citizens, as well as the willingness of elected officials to prioritize the needs of the people they represent.

In conclusion, the tweet by Shipwreck sparks an important conversation about the efficiency and effectiveness of the federal congress. While it may be controversial to suggest that we don’t need a federal congress, it’s worth considering alternative approaches to governance that may better serve the interests of the public. Whether or not significant changes are made to the current system remains to be seen, but it’s clear that there is room for improvement in how our government functions.

Source: Twitter – Shipwreck