In a recent development in the ongoing legal battle over Trump administration’s deportation flights under the Alien Enemies Act (AEA), Judge Boasberg has extended his block on the removals for another two weeks, until at least April 12th. This decision comes as the Trump administration seeks intervention from the Supreme Court to overturn Boasberg’s ruling and a circuit court panel to resume the AEA removals.

The Alien Enemies Act, a law dating back to 1798, grants the president the authority to deport non-citizens deemed to be a threat to national security during times of war or conflict. The Trump administration has been using this law to justify the deportation of certain individuals, but Judge Boasberg’s ruling has put a halt to these removals.

The ongoing legal battle has raised questions about the scope of presidential authority under the AEA and the rights of non-citizens facing deportation. Critics of the Trump administration’s use of the AEA argue that it is being used to target individuals based on their nationality or religious beliefs, rather than legitimate national security concerns.

Judge Boasberg’s decision to extend the block on deportation flights reflects the complexity of the legal issues at play and the need for further judicial review. The Trump administration’s efforts to overturn the ruling and resume the removals highlight the high stakes involved in this case and the differing interpretations of the AEA’s provisions.

As the legal battle continues to unfold, it remains to be seen how the Supreme Court will respond to the Trump administration’s request for intervention. The outcome of this case could have far-reaching implications for the rights of non-citizens facing deportation under the Alien Enemies Act and the limits of presidential power in matters of national security.

Overall, the extension of the block on Trump deportation flights via the Alien Enemies Act by Judge Boasberg, and the Trump administration’s appeal to the Supreme Court, underscore the ongoing legal challenges surrounding immigration policy and national security in the United States. The outcome of this case will likely have significant implications for the rights of non-citizens and the balance of power between the executive and judicial branches.

NEW: Judge Boasberg has extended his block on Trump deportation flights via the Alien Enemies Act for another two weeks, until at least April 12th. The Trump admin is asking the Supreme Court to step in and overturn Boasberg and a circuit court panel to restart the AEA removals.

— Bill Melugin (@BillMelugin_) March 28, 2025

In a recent development, Judge Boasberg has extended his block on Trump deportation flights under the Alien Enemies Act for an additional two weeks, now lasting until at least April 12th. This decision comes as the Trump administration seeks intervention from the Supreme Court to overturn Boasberg’s ruling and resume the removals authorized by the AEA.

The Background of the Alien Enemies Act

The Alien Enemies Act dates back to 1798 and was originally enacted during a time of heightened national security concerns. The law allows the President to designate certain individuals as "enemy aliens" during times of war or national emergency, granting the government authority to deport these individuals from the country. While the Act has been used sparingly throughout history, its application in the context of the Trump administration’s immigration policies has sparked controversy and legal challenges.

Judge Boasberg’s Decision

Judge Boasberg’s initial block on Trump deportation flights under the AEA was put in place to allow time for legal challenges to be heard. The extension of this block reflects the ongoing debate surrounding the constitutionality and implications of using the AEA to remove individuals from the United States. Boasberg’s decision to extend the block signals a temporary halt to the Trump administration’s efforts to deport individuals designated as "enemy aliens" under the Act.

The Trump Administration’s Response

In response to Judge Boasberg’s ruling, the Trump administration has turned to the Supreme Court in an attempt to reverse the decision and resume deportation flights under the AEA. The administration’s argument centers on the President’s authority to designate individuals as "enemy aliens" and the government’s ability to enforce immigration laws in the interest of national security. The outcome of this legal battle will have far-reaching implications for the future application of the Alien Enemies Act and the government’s authority to deport individuals deemed a threat to national security.

Implications for Immigration Policy

The ongoing legal battle over the use of the Alien Enemies Act highlights the broader debate surrounding immigration policy in the United States. The Act, originally intended to address national security concerns during times of war, has taken on new significance in the context of modern immigration enforcement practices. The outcome of this case will not only impact the individuals directly affected by the AEA but will also shape the future of immigration policy and the government’s authority to deport individuals deemed a threat to national security.

Conclusion

As the legal battle over the Alien Enemies Act continues to unfold, the implications for immigration policy and national security remain at the forefront of the debate. Judge Boasberg’s decision to extend the block on Trump deportation flights under the AEA sets the stage for a high-stakes legal showdown in the Supreme Court. The outcome of this case will have far-reaching implications for the future application of the Act and the government’s authority to enforce immigration laws in the interest of national security. Stay tuned for updates as this story develops.

Source: Bill Melugin’s Twitter