“Principled Conservative Legal Scholars Slam Trump’s Terrorist Deportation, Ignore Biden’s Persecution”

By | March 28, 2025

In a recent tweet, Mike Davis criticizes “Principled Conservative” legal scholars for their selective outrage and hypocrisy when it comes to political issues. He accuses them of being silent when Biden was allegedly persecuting Trump supporters, but now suddenly finding their voices to attack Trump’s deportation of foreign terrorists. Davis labels them as the “Democrats’ useful idiots,” implying that they are being manipulated by the opposing party for their own agenda.

This tweet highlights the ongoing political polarization and the lack of consistent principles among some legal scholars. The term “Principled Conservative” typically refers to individuals who adhere to conservative values and beliefs, including a commitment to upholding the rule of law and protecting individual rights. However, Davis suggests that these scholars are failing to live up to their principles by remaining silent on certain issues and only speaking out when it serves their political interests.

The tweet also touches on the contentious issue of immigration and national security. Trump’s deportation of foreign terrorists is framed as a positive action in the fight against terrorism, but the legal scholars’ criticism of this policy is seen as misguided and politically motivated. Davis seems to be implying that these scholars are more concerned with attacking Trump than with supporting policies that prioritize national security.

Overall, this tweet reflects the ongoing political divide in the United States and the challenges of maintaining consistent principles in a highly polarized environment. It raises important questions about the role of legal scholars in shaping public discourse and the need for intellectual honesty and integrity in political debates. Davis’s criticism serves as a reminder to all individuals, regardless of their political beliefs, to remain true to their principles and values, even when it is politically inconvenient.

  • YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO WATCH THIS TRENDING STORY ON YOUTUBE.  Waverly Hills Hospital's Horror Story: The Most Haunted Room 502

Dear “Principled Conservative” Legal Scholars:

It seems that in the ever-evolving world of politics, hypocrisy knows no bounds. For years, many self-proclaimed principled conservative legal scholars remained eerily quiet when former President Biden was persecuting Trump supporters. The same individuals who claim to uphold the rule of law and defend the Constitution suddenly lost their voices when it came to speaking out against the blatant attacks on freedom of speech and political dissent.

Now, however, these very same individuals have found their voices again. But this time, it’s not to defend the rights of American citizens or to uphold the principles of justice. No, instead, they are using their platforms to attack President Trump’s deportation of foreign terrorists. It is truly baffling how these so-called conservative legal scholars can justify supporting the actions of a president who turned a blind eye to the persecution of American citizens while condemning the efforts to protect the country from external threats.

The blatant double standard displayed by these individuals is not only disappointing but also dangerous. By choosing to remain silent in the face of injustice and then speaking out against measures taken to protect national security, they are only serving as useful idiots for the Democratic party. Their selective outrage and willingness to bend their principles based on political affiliations undermine the credibility of the conservative movement and erode public trust in the legal system.

It is crucial for individuals in positions of influence, such as legal scholars, to remain consistent in their principles and values. They must prioritize the rule of law and the protection of constitutional rights above political expediency. By failing to do so, they risk becoming pawns in the political game, easily manipulated by those in power to serve their own agendas.

In conclusion, it is essential for "principled conservative" legal scholars to reflect on their actions and consider the impact of their words on the public discourse. Upholding the principles of justice, defending the rule of law, and protecting the rights of all individuals should be their top priorities, regardless of political affiliations. It is only by remaining true to these values that they can truly fulfill their roles as guardians of justice and defenders of the Constitution.

Source: Twitter – Mike Davis

Remember, actions speak louder than words, and true principles are tested in times of adversity. It is time for these "principled conservative" legal scholars to step up and show where their true loyalties lie – with the Constitution and the American people, or with political expediency and partisan agendas. The choice is theirs to make.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *