Breaking News: Jill Underly’s Controversial Stance on School Choice

In a recent statement that has sparked significant debate, Jill Underly, the Wisconsin Superintendent of Public Instruction, has announced her intention to eliminate school choice. This declaration raises eyebrows, particularly considering that Underly has opted to send her own children to a private school, which contradicts her public position on educational options for families. As she campaigns for reelection this Tuesday, her stance has ignited discussions about the implications of school choice policies in Wisconsin and the role of public education leaders in shaping educational opportunities.

Understanding School Choice

School choice refers to a variety of educational options available to families, allowing them to select the schools their children attend rather than being limited to their designated public school based on geographic location. These options can include private schools, charter schools, and homeschooling. Proponents argue that school choice promotes competition among schools, leading to improved educational outcomes, while opponents contend that it can undermine public school funding and exacerbate inequalities in education.

Jill Underly’s Position

Jill Underly’s call to eliminate school choice has drawn criticism, particularly from those who advocate for parental rights in education. Critics argue that her position undermines the ability of families to choose the best educational setting for their children. Underly’s background as a public education advocate has led many to question the consistency of her actions and statements, especially in light of her decision to enroll her children in private schooling.

The Election Landscape

As Underly prepares for her reelection bid, the political landscape in Wisconsin is becoming increasingly polarized. Her opponent, Brittney Kinser, stands firmly in support of school choice policies, promising to uphold parental rights and expand educational options. This contrast in educational philosophies has become a focal point of the campaign, with both candidates presenting their visions for the future of Wisconsin’s educational system.

Implications for Wisconsin Education

The debate over school choice is particularly relevant in Wisconsin, where discussions about public education, funding, and access to quality schooling are ongoing. Proponents of school choice argue that expanding these options can lead to better outcomes for students, especially in underperforming school districts. Critics, however, fear that eliminating school choice may limit opportunities for families seeking alternatives to traditional public schools.

Public Response and Activism

The reaction to Underly’s announcement has been immediate, with many parents, educators, and advocacy groups voicing their opinions on social media and community forums. School choice advocates have mobilized to support Kinser’s campaign, emphasizing the importance of maintaining educational options for families. The response illustrates the deep divisions in public opinion regarding educational policy and the future of schools in Wisconsin.

The Role of Social Media

Social media plays an influential role in shaping public discourse during election cycles. Underly’s comments have been widely shared and discussed, highlighting the power of platforms like Twitter to amplify voices and mobilize supporters. The discourse surrounding her reelection campaign underscores the importance of transparency and accountability in educational leadership, particularly when it comes to policies that impact students and families.

Conclusion: The Future of Wisconsin Education

As the election approaches, the debate over school choice in Wisconsin is likely to intensify. Jill Underly’s controversial stance presents a pivotal moment for voters to consider the implications of educational policy on their communities. With Brittney Kinser advocating for school choice, the choice for voters may ultimately reflect their beliefs about parental rights, educational equity, and the future of public education in the state.

In summary, the unfolding narrative surrounding Jill Underly’s campaign and her stance on school choice represents a critical intersection of educational policy, parental rights, and political accountability. As Wisconsin residents prepare to cast their votes, the implications of this debate will undoubtedly resonate throughout the state’s educational landscape for years to come.

BREAKING: Jill Underly says she wants to ELIMINATE school choice.

She sent her kids to PRIVATE school.

She’s Wisconsin’s superintendent of public instruction.

She’s running for reelection TUESDAY.

Kick her out of office.

Her opponent, Brittney Kinser, supports school choice. pic.twitter.com/i7egS0wkaK

— Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist (@DeAngelisCorey) March 28, 2025

BREAKING: Jill Underly says she wants to ELIMINATE school choice.

When it comes to education, the debate over school choice has always been a hot-button issue. Recently, Jill Underly, the current Wisconsin superintendent of public instruction, made headlines with her bold declaration that she wants to eliminate school choice altogether. This statement has sparked a wave of reactions, especially given her background as a parent who has chosen to send her own kids to private school. The irony isn’t lost on many, and as she runs for reelection on Tuesday, the question on everyone’s mind is: what does this mean for the future of education in Wisconsin?

She sent her kids to PRIVATE school.

Jill Underly’s decision to send her children to a private institution raises eyebrows, especially when she is advocating to eliminate the very options that allowed her family the freedom to choose. Critics have pointed out that her stance on school choice contradicts her personal decisions. If she believes that school choice should be eliminated, does that mean other families should not have the same opportunities she did? It’s a perplexing situation that has many Wisconsin residents questioning her commitment to providing quality education for all children.

The dichotomy in her position is particularly striking when you consider the current landscape of education in the state. According to a recent article by [Wisconsin Public Radio](https://www.wpr.org), many families rely on school choice programs as a means of accessing better educational opportunities for their children. With options like charter schools and private institutions, parents have the ability to select schools that align with their values, educational philosophies, and their children’s unique needs.

She’s Wisconsin’s superintendent of public instruction.

As the Wisconsin superintendent of public instruction, Jill Underly holds a position of significant influence over the state’s education policy. Her recent statements suggest a shift away from the current educational landscape that allows parents to choose the best fit for their children. This shift could have profound implications for families across the state, particularly those who have benefited from school choice programs.

Many educational leaders and stakeholders are concerned about her proposed elimination of school choice. In her role, Underly has the power to impact not just policy but also funding and resources allocated to schools. An elimination of school choice could lead to a more standardized educational system that may not cater to the diverse needs of Wisconsin’s students. As reported by [The Journal Sentinel](https://www.jsonline.com), parents and education advocates are rallying against Underly’s position, emphasizing that educational choice empowers families and promotes accountability among schools.

She’s running for reelection TUESDAY.

With the election looming on Tuesday, voters are faced with a critical decision regarding the future of their children’s education. Jill Underly is not the only candidate in the race; her opponent, Brittney Kinser, is a vocal supporter of school choice. Kinser’s platform emphasizes the importance of parental choice in education, arguing that every family should have the option to select the best educational path for their children, whether that is public, private, or charter schools.

The contrast between Underly and Kinser could not be clearer. While Underly is advocating for the elimination of school choice, Kinser is positioning herself as a champion for educational freedom. This difference in approach is essential for voters to consider, as it will ultimately shape the educational landscape of Wisconsin for years to come.

Kick her out of office.

Given the stakes involved in this election, many parents and education advocates are urging voters to consider the implications of reelecting Underly. The call to “kick her out of office” is not just a rallying cry; it’s a reflection of deep concern over what her policies could mean for the future of education in Wisconsin. For families who rely on school choice, the potential elimination of these programs could signal a regression in educational quality and accessibility.

Engagement in this election is crucial. Parents, teachers, and community members are encouraged to educate themselves on the candidates’ positions and to participate actively in the electoral process. The opportunity to voice their opinions at the ballot box could determine whether Wisconsin continues to embrace educational choice or moves toward a more restrictive educational system.

Her opponent, Brittney Kinser, supports school choice.

Brittney Kinser presents a compelling alternative to Jill Underly’s platform. As a staunch supporter of school choice, she advocates for policies that empower parents to make informed decisions about their children’s education. Kinser’s perspective aligns with a growing movement across the nation that emphasizes parental involvement in educational decisions.

Kinser’s commitment to school choice resonates with many Wisconsin families who appreciate the flexibility and opportunities that come with it. By supporting various educational options, Kinser aims to ensure that every child has access to quality education that meets their individual needs.

As the election approaches, it’s clear that the choice between Underly and Kinser could not be more consequential. Voters have the power to influence the future of education in Wisconsin, and understanding the implications of their choices is vital.

The Future of School Choice in Wisconsin

The outcome of this election could set a precedent for the future of educational policy in Wisconsin. With advocates on both sides of the school choice debate, the discussion is likely to continue long after the votes are counted.

If Jill Underly retains her position, the implications for school choice could be significant. Educational reforms may lean toward a more centralized approach, where parents have fewer options to choose from. Conversely, a victory for Brittney Kinser could signal a stronger commitment to preserving and expanding school choice options in the state, ensuring that families have the flexibility they need to pursue the best educational environments for their children.

As voters head to the polls, it’s essential to weigh the implications of their decisions carefully. The future of education in Wisconsin hangs in the balance, and the voices of parents and community members will play a pivotal role in shaping that future.

In an era where education is more critical than ever, the choice of who leads Wisconsin’s educational system is a decision that families must make with foresight and consideration. Whether it’s supporting school choice or advocating for alternative educational reforms, every vote will count in determining the path forward.

For more details on the candidates and their positions, check out [Ballotpedia](https://ballotpedia.org/Wisconsin) and stay informed about the upcoming election that could shape the educational landscape of Wisconsin for generations to come.