Wisconsin Supreme Court Race: A Tight Contest Between Brad Schimel and Susan Crawford

The Wisconsin Supreme Court race has become a focal point of political discussion and analysis, especially as recent polling indicates that the contest is exceptionally close. As of March 12, 2025, a poll conducted by OnMessage Inc. reveals that both candidates—Republican Brad Schimel and Democrat Susan Crawford—are tied at 47% each, with only 5% of voters remaining undecided. This development marks a significant moment in the judicial landscape of Wisconsin, as the outcome of this election could have long-lasting effects on the state’s legal framework and political climate.

Context of the Wisconsin Supreme Court Race

The Wisconsin Supreme Court plays a pivotal role in interpreting state laws and the constitution, influencing everything from election laws to public health mandates. With the court currently leaning conservative, the election of a liberal candidate such as Susan Crawford could shift the balance of power, impacting decisions on key issues. Conversely, a victory for Brad Schimel, who has previously served as the state’s Attorney General, would likely maintain the conservative majority and uphold existing legal precedents that favor the Republican agenda.

Polling Insights

The recent poll, conducted among 600 likely voters, indicates a highly competitive race. Both candidates are drawing equal support, which suggests that the election could hinge on various factors, including voter turnout, campaign strategies, and the candidates’ ability to sway undecided voters. The 5% of undecided voters could play a crucial role in determining the winner, making outreach and engagement efforts essential in the days leading up to the election.

Candidate Profiles

Brad Schimel: As a former Attorney General, Schimel has a robust background in law enforcement and legal matters. His campaign focuses on maintaining law and order, protecting individual rights, and upholding conservative values. Schimel aims to appeal to traditional Republican voters by emphasizing his experience and commitment to upholding the Constitution.

Susan Crawford: In contrast, Crawford is a seasoned attorney with a focus on civil rights and social justice. Her campaign seeks to resonate with progressive voters who prioritize issues such as reproductive rights, healthcare access, and criminal justice reform. Crawford’s strategy includes mobilizing younger voters and those who may feel disenfranchised by the current political climate.

Voter Engagement Strategies

With such a tight race, both candidates are likely ramping up their voter engagement efforts. This includes door-to-door canvassing, phone banking, and social media outreach to connect with potential voters. Given the current political landscape, utilizing digital platforms to communicate their messages effectively will be crucial.

Importance of Voter Turnout

Voter turnout will be a key determinant in this election. Historical data shows that higher turnout rates often favor Democratic candidates, primarily due to increased participation from younger voters and minority groups. In contrast, Republican candidates tend to benefit from strong turnout in rural areas. Therefore, both campaigns must focus on mobilizing their respective bases while also appealing to undecided voters.

The Role of Social Media in the Campaign

Social media is playing an increasingly vital role in shaping public opinion during this campaign. Platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram allow candidates to convey their messages directly to voters without the filter of traditional media. The rapid dissemination of polling information, such as the recent tie between Schimel and Crawford, can influence voter perceptions and engagement. As evidenced by the tweet shared by Eric Daugherty, real-time updates on polling data can energize supporters and prompt discussions around the candidates’ platforms.

Implications of the Election Outcome

The outcome of the Wisconsin Supreme Court race could have far-reaching implications beyond the state itself. A shift in the court’s composition could influence legal interpretations on critical issues, including voting rights, gerrymandering, and public health policies. As such, national attention is focused on this race, with implications that could resonate in future elections and judicial appointments across the country.

Conclusion

The Wisconsin Supreme Court race is shaping up to be one of the most closely watched elections in recent history. With both candidates currently tied in the polls, the next steps taken by Brad Schimel and Susan Crawford will be crucial in the final push toward election day. Voter engagement, turnout, and the ability to sway undecided voters will ultimately determine the future of the Wisconsin Supreme Court and its impact on state and national issues. As we approach the election, this race serves as a reminder of the critical importance of judicial elections in shaping our legal landscape and the political future of our communities.

JUST IN: WISCONSIN Supreme Court race is now TIED…

Brad Schimel: 47% (=)
Susan Crawford: 47%
Undecided: 5%@OnMessageInc | 3/9-10 | N=600LV pic.twitter.com/ytNOjiFWhZ

— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) March 12, 2025

JUST IN: WISCONSIN Supreme Court Race is Now TIED…

The political landscape in Wisconsin is buzzing with excitement and tension as recent polling data has revealed a significant twist in the race for the Wisconsin Supreme Court. According to a poll conducted by OnMessage Inc., both candidates are neck and neck, leaving many voters on the edge of their seats. The latest numbers show that Brad Schimel and Susan Crawford are both at 47%, with 5% of voters still undecided. This news has sent shockwaves through the political community, and it’s essential to dive into what this means for the candidates and the electorate.

Brad Schimel: 47% (=)

Brad Schimel, the Republican candidate, has been a prominent figure in Wisconsin politics. Known for his previous role as the state Attorney General, Schimel has built a reputation based on conservative values and a tough-on-crime stance. His campaign focuses on maintaining law and order, upholding the Constitution, and ensuring that the judiciary remains impartial.

Schimel’s supporters tout his experience and ability to navigate the complexities of the legal system. They argue that his background will allow him to make sound decisions that align with conservative principles. However, with the race tied, Schimel must rally his base and appeal to undecided voters to secure a victory. Engaging in community outreach and addressing the concerns of Wisconsin residents will be crucial in the coming days.

Susan Crawford: 47%

On the flip side, Democrat Susan Crawford is making waves with her campaign, emphasizing a more progressive approach to the judicial system. With a background in law and academia, Crawford presents herself as a candidate ready to fight for justice and equity. Her supporters believe that she will bring much-needed change to the Wisconsin Supreme Court, focusing on issues like reproductive rights, criminal justice reform, and environmental regulations.

Crawford’s campaign has gained momentum, especially among younger voters and those seeking a shift from traditional conservative policies. The tie in the polls indicates strong support for her message, but she faces the challenge of converting undecided voters and encouraging them to choose her over Schimel. As the election draws nearer, Crawford’s ability to articulate her vision for the court will be key in swaying those last few undecided votes.

Undecided: 5%

The 5% of voters who are still undecided hold significant power in this election. Their choices could tip the scales in either direction, making their engagement crucial. Understanding why these voters are hesitant can provide insights into the broader sentiments of the Wisconsin electorate.

Many undecided voters express concern over the direction of the state and the implications of this election on issues that matter to them personally. Whether it’s education, healthcare, or civil rights, these voters are looking for candidates who resonate with their values and concerns. Engaging this demographic through targeted messaging and community events could prove vital for both campaigns.

The Importance of Voter Engagement

With the race now tied, voter engagement becomes more critical than ever. Both campaigns need to ramp up their efforts to connect with constituents and address the issues that matter most. This can take many forms, including town hall meetings, social media campaigns, and direct outreach.

Candidates will benefit from leveraging local influencers and community leaders to spread their message further. Engaging with voters in a more personal and relatable manner can help bridge the gap between candidates and constituents.

What This Means for the Future of Wisconsin

The outcome of the Wisconsin Supreme Court race has far-reaching implications for the future of the state. A court that leans more conservative or progressive can significantly impact legislation and judicial precedents in Wisconsin. This election isn’t just about the two candidates; it’s about the values and direction that Wisconsinites want for their state.

As the campaigns heat up, it’s essential for voters to stay informed and actively participate in the electoral process. The stakes are high, and every vote counts.

Looking Ahead: Strategies for Success

Both Schimel and Crawford have their work cut out for them as they navigate this competitive landscape. Here are some strategies they might consider to enhance their chances of success:

1. **Targeted Messaging**: Each candidate should focus on tailoring their message to resonate with specific voter segments. Understanding the concerns of different demographics can help them articulate their positions more effectively.

2. **Grassroots Engagement**: Building a strong grassroots movement can create enthusiasm and drive voter turnout. Engaging volunteers and local organizations can amplify their reach.

3. **Utilizing Digital Platforms**: With many voters turning to social media for information, candidates should invest in a robust digital strategy. This includes not only advertising but also engaging in conversations with constituents.

4. **Addressing Key Issues**: Both candidates need to focus on the issues that are top of mind for voters. Whether it’s healthcare, education, or economic policies, articulating clear stances on these topics can sway undecided voters.

5. **Voter Outreach**: Engaging directly with voters through phone calls, door-to-door canvassing, and community events can help candidates connect on a personal level and build trust.

The Role of Media in the Campaign

In today’s digital age, media plays a crucial role in shaping public perception. Both candidates must navigate media coverage and use it to their advantage. Positive media coverage can bolster a campaign, while negative coverage can hinder progress.

Candidates should engage with the media to ensure that their messages are communicated accurately and effectively. Hosting press conferences, conducting interviews, and responding to media inquiries can help them maintain control over their narratives.

Final Thoughts on the Wisconsin Supreme Court Race

The Wisconsin Supreme Court race is more than just a political contest; it’s a reflection of the values and priorities of the state’s residents. With both candidates tied at 47%, the focus now turns to the undecided voters and how each campaign can persuade them to join their side.

As we move closer to the election, it will be fascinating to see how the candidates adapt their strategies and how voter sentiment shifts. The stakes are high, and the outcome of this election will undoubtedly shape the future of Wisconsin’s judicial landscape.

Staying engaged, informed, and active in the electoral process will be essential for all Wisconsinites as they head to the polls. The power to influence the future of their state is in their hands, and every vote truly matters.