Allegedly, Adding Justices to the Supreme Court Could Restore Respect

So, here’s the scoop – Laurence Tribe, a well-known legal scholar, recently took to twitter to propose a controversial idea: adding four justices to the Supreme Court. According to Tribe, this move would be the quickest way to restore a Supreme Court that is worthy of respect. Now, before you start raising your eyebrows, let’s dive a little deeper into this alleged proposal.

Tribe argues that adding four justices to the Supreme Court is not only constitutional but also practical and long overdue. He believes that this action would help balance out the current composition of the Court and ensure that it remains an impartial and respected institution. However, there’s a catch – Tribe claims that only a “Blue Tsunami” on November 5 would make it politically feasible to add these justices.

Now, before we get too ahead of ourselves, it’s important to note that this proposal is just that – a proposal. There is no concrete evidence to suggest that adding justices to the Supreme Court is on the horizon. However, it does raise some interesting questions about the current state of the Court and the potential impact of such a controversial move.

The Supreme Court plays a crucial role in shaping the laws and policies of our country. Its decisions have far-reaching implications that can affect the lives of millions of Americans. As such, it is essential that the Court remains fair, impartial, and above reproach. However, in recent years, the Court has become increasingly politicized, with justices often voting along party lines rather than on the basis of the law.

This alleged proposal to add justices to the Supreme Court reflects a growing concern about the current state of the judiciary. Many Americans feel that the Court has lost its independence and credibility, and they worry about the long-term implications of this trend. By adding justices to the Court, some believe that we could restore its integrity and ensure that it remains a respected institution for years to come.

Of course, the idea of adding justices to the Supreme Court is not without its critics. Some argue that such a move would further politicize the Court and undermine its legitimacy. They worry that expanding the Court would set a dangerous precedent and open the door to future manipulation for political gain. Additionally, there are concerns about the logistical challenges of adding justices, including how they would be selected and confirmed.

Ultimately, whether or not adding justices to the Supreme Court is the right move is a complex and contentious question. It raises important issues about the role of the judiciary in our democracy and the need to ensure that our highest court remains independent and impartial. While Tribe’s proposal may be controversial, it serves as a reminder of the importance of preserving the integrity of our institutions and upholding the rule of law.

So, what do you think about this alleged proposal to add justices to the Supreme Court? Do you believe it could help restore respect to the Court, or do you have concerns about the potential consequences of such a move? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below!

tweet” data-width=”550″>

The quickest way to restore a Supreme Court worthy of respect would be to add four justices. Clearly constitutional, practical, overdue. But only a Blue Tsunami on November 5 would make it politically feasible. https://t.co/J2sU3dszEq

— Laurence Tribe (@tribelaw) November 1, 2024

What is the Proposal to Add Four Justices to the Supreme Court?

The idea of adding four justices to the Supreme Court has been proposed as a way to restore the Court’s credibility and respect. This proposal suggests that by increasing the number of justices, the balance of the Court could be shifted to more accurately reflect the views of the American people. Laurence Tribe, a prominent legal scholar, argues that this move is not only constitutional but also practical and long overdue.

The proposal to add justices to the Supreme Court is not a new concept. Throughout history, the number of Supreme Court justices has varied, with the current number set at nine since 1869. The Constitution does not specify the exact number of justices, leaving it up to Congress to determine. Adding four justices would bring the total number to thirteen, which some believe would help to depoliticize the Court and ensure a more diverse range of perspectives.

Is Adding Justices Constitutional?

The Constitution does not set a specific number of justices for the Supreme Court, giving Congress the authority to change the number as it sees fit. The Judiciary Act of 1869 established the current number of nine justices, but this number is not set in stone. Therefore, adding four justices would not violate the Constitution but rather fall within the scope of Congress’s powers.

Some may argue that adding justices for political reasons could undermine the independence and integrity of the Court. However, proponents of this proposal argue that the current composition of the Court has already been politicized, and adding justices could help to rebalance the scales.

Why is a Blue Tsunami Necessary for this Proposal?

While adding justices to the Supreme Court may be constitutional, the political feasibility of such a move is a different matter. In order to pass legislation to increase the number of justices, there would need to be sufficient support in Congress. A “Blue Tsunami” refers to a significant electoral victory for the Democratic Party, which could result in a majority in both the House and the Senate.

Without a Blue Tsunami, it would be difficult to garner the political support needed to add four justices to the Supreme Court. The partisan divide in Congress makes it challenging to pass any legislation, let alone one as contentious as expanding the Court. Therefore, a significant shift in the balance of power would be necessary to make this proposal a reality.

What Would Adding Four Justices Mean for the Supreme Court?

Adding four justices to the Supreme Court would have significant implications for the Court’s decisions and dynamics. With a total of thirteen justices, the Court would be less likely to be swayed by a single swing vote, as is often the case with a nine-member Court. This could lead to more consensus-based decisions and a broader range of perspectives being considered.

Additionally, adding justices could help to address the current imbalance of the Court, which leans conservative due to recent appointments. By adding four justices, the Court could become more reflective of the diversity of opinions in the country, ensuring a more balanced and fair system of justice.

In conclusion, the proposal to add four justices to the Supreme Court is a controversial yet intriguing idea that has the potential to reshape the highest court in the land. While the constitutionality of such a move is not in question, the political feasibility remains a significant hurdle. Only time will tell if a Blue Tsunami on November 5 will pave the way for this bold proposal to become a reality.

Sources:
– New York Times
– Washington Post
– NPR