PA election expert tells Elon Musk: Voting machines UNSECURE! Elon shocked.

In a recent Twitter post, an election integrity expert in Pennsylvania allegedly revealed to Elon Musk that state officials have admitted in court that the voting machines are not secure. According to the tweet, Jonathan Marks, a Pennsylvania official, admitted this information in court the previous week. This claim has sparked a wave of concern and speculation about the security of the voting machines used in the state.

The tweet, posted by user George (@BehizyTweets) on October 17, 2024, included a video clip of the alleged conversation between the election integrity expert and Elon Musk. In the video, Musk reacts with surprise to the news, asking for confirmation that Marks did indeed admit this in court. The expert responds by affirming that Marks made the admission during a court proceeding and that it is documented in a transcript.

The implications of this alleged admission are significant, as the security of voting machines is a crucial aspect of ensuring fair and transparent elections. If the voting machines in Pennsylvania are indeed not secure, it could raise serious questions about the integrity of past and future election results in the state. This revelation has the potential to shake public confidence in the electoral process and lead to calls for increased security measures.

The tweet has quickly gained traction on social media, with many users expressing shock and concern over the news. Some have called for further investigation into the matter, while others have questioned the reliability of the voting machines used in Pennsylvania. The alleged admission by Jonathan Marks has sparked a heated debate about election security and the need for greater transparency in the voting process.

While the tweet does not provide concrete evidence to support the claim, it has nevertheless raised important questions about the security of voting machines in Pennsylvania. The fact that a state official reportedly admitted in court that the machines are not secure is a cause for alarm and underscores the need for greater oversight and accountability in the electoral system. It remains to be seen how this revelation will impact future elections in Pennsylvania and what steps will be taken to address the issue.

In conclusion, the alleged admission by a Pennsylvania official that voting machines in the state are not secure has sparked widespread concern and debate. The tweet, posted by a self-proclaimed election integrity expert, has raised important questions about the integrity of the electoral process in Pennsylvania. While further investigation is needed to confirm the veracity of the claim, the news has highlighted the need for greater transparency and security in the voting system. As the story continues to unfold, it is clear that the issue of election security will remain a topic of significant interest and concern for many.

WATCH: An election integrity expert in Pennsylvania just revealed to Elon Musk that the state’s officials have admitted in court that the voting machines are NOT secure

“Jonathan Marks admitted this in court last week.”

Elon: Wow. He did?

“In court on a transcript.” – Greg… pic.twitter.com/PwGmdjHYA6

— George (@BehizyTweets) October 17, 2024

When it comes to the integrity of elections, ensuring that voting machines are secure is of utmost importance. Recently, an election integrity expert in Pennsylvania dropped a bombshell revelation to none other than tech mogul Elon Musk. The expert revealed that state officials have admitted in court that the voting machines in Pennsylvania are not secure. This revelation has sparked widespread concern and raised questions about the reliability of the electoral process in the state.

### What is the significance of this revelation?

The admission by Pennsylvania officials that voting machines are not secure is significant for several reasons. First and foremost, it calls into question the validity of past election results in the state. If the voting machines are not secure, it raises the possibility of tampering and manipulation of election outcomes. This revelation also undermines public trust in the electoral process and raises concerns about the integrity of future elections in Pennsylvania.

### Who is Jonathan Marks and what role did he play in this revelation?

Jonathan Marks is a key figure in this revelation, as he is the one who admitted in court that the voting machines in Pennsylvania are not secure. Marks serves as the Deputy Secretary for Elections and Administration in Pennsylvania, making his admission all the more significant. His acknowledgment of the insecurity of voting machines has shed light on a crucial issue that has long been overlooked in the state.

### How did Elon Musk react to this revelation?

When informed of Jonathan Marks’ admission in court, Elon Musk’s response was one of surprise. Musk, known for his innovation and forward-thinking, was taken aback by the revelation that voting machines in Pennsylvania are not secure. His reaction underscores the gravity of the situation and the importance of addressing the issue of election integrity in the state.

### What are the implications of insecure voting machines?

The implications of insecure voting machines are far-reaching and have serious consequences for the democratic process. Insecure voting machines open the door to various forms of election fraud, including hacking and tampering. This compromises the integrity of elections and undermines the fundamental principle of democracy – that every vote should count and be counted accurately. The revelation that voting machines in Pennsylvania are not secure highlights the urgent need for action to safeguard the electoral process.

In light of this revelation, it is crucial that steps are taken to address the issue of insecure voting machines in Pennsylvania. This may involve implementing stricter security measures, conducting audits of voting machines, and exploring alternative voting methods that are more secure and reliable. The integrity of the electoral process is paramount, and it is essential that all necessary precautions are taken to ensure that elections are free, fair, and secure.

In conclusion, the admission by Pennsylvania officials that voting machines are not secure is a concerning development that raises serious questions about the integrity of the electoral process in the state. This revelation underscores the need for greater vigilance and oversight to protect the democratic rights of all citizens. By addressing the issue of insecure voting machines, Pennsylvania can take a vital step towards preserving the integrity of its elections and upholding the principles of democracy.