Next CJI: Justice Khanna’s Shocking Clean Chit on EVM Scam

In a recent tweet that has caused quite a stir online, it has been alleged that Chief Justice of India (CJI) Chandrachud has proposed Justice Sanjiv Khanna as the Next CJI. The tweet, posted by user Ankit Mayank, claims that Justice Khanna had given a clean chit to the Election Commission of India (ECI) on the Electronic Voting Machine (EVM) and Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT) scam.

According to the tweet, Justice Khanna believes that updating the frequently asked questions (FAQs) section on the ECI website is sufficient to restore voters’ faith in EVMs. This statement has left many people feeling disillusioned and skeptical about the judiciary’s ability to uphold justice and fairness in the country.

The news of Justice Khanna’s proposed appointment as the Next CJI comes as a surprise to many, especially given the controversy surrounding his handling of the EVM and VVPAT scam. The fact that he has allegedly given a clean chit to the ECI has raised concerns about his impartiality and commitment to upholding the rule of law.

The tweet has sparked a heated debate on social media, with many expressing disappointment and frustration at the state of the judiciary. Some have even gone so far as to say that they have lost hope in the judiciary’s ability to deliver justice and protect the rights of the people.

While it is important to approach such allegations with a critical eye and not jump to conclusions, the tweet has certainly raised important questions about the integrity and independence of the judiciary. It serves as a reminder of the need for transparency, accountability, and ethical conduct within the legal system.

In a time when trust in institutions is already at an all-time low, news like this only serves to further erode the public’s confidence in the judiciary. It highlights the importance of holding those in positions of power accountable and ensuring that they act in the best interests of the people they serve.

As we wait for more information to come to light and for official statements to be made, it is crucial that we continue to demand transparency, fairness, and justice from our leaders and institutions. Only by holding them accountable can we hope to build a society where everyone is equal under the law.

In conclusion, the tweet alleging that CJI Chandrachud has proposed Justice Sanjiv Khanna as the Next CJI raises important questions about the integrity and independence of the judiciary. While we must approach such allegations with caution and skepticism, they serve as a reminder of the need for transparency, accountability, and ethical conduct within our legal system. As we await further information, it is up to us to demand justice and fairness from those in positions of power.

BIG BREAKING

CJI Chandrachud has proposed Justice Sanjiv Khanna as the Next CJI

He had given clean chit to ECI on EVM & VVPAT Scam

As per him, updating FAQs section on ECI website is enough to restore voters faith in EVMs

No hopes from Judiciary now pic.twitter.com/iBCBRIHa3w

— Ankit Mayank (@mr_mayank) October 17, 2024

When it comes to the recent proposal made by CJI Chandrachud to appoint Justice Sanjiv Khanna as the Next CJI, there are several important questions that come to mind. Let’s break down the key points and implications of this decision.

Who is Justice Sanjiv Khanna?

Justice Sanjiv Khanna is a sitting judge of the Supreme Court of India. He has been known for his judgements on various important cases and has gained recognition for his legal acumen. His appointment as the Next CJI is indeed a significant development in the Indian judiciary.

One of the notable aspects of Justice Khanna’s career is his involvement in giving a clean chit to the Election Commission of India (ECI) on the Electronic Voting Machine (EVM) and Voter Verified Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT) scam. This decision has raised eyebrows among many who question the integrity of the ECI and its election processes.

What is the EVM and VVPAT Scam?

The EVM and VVPAT scam refer to allegations of tampering with electronic voting machines and paper audit trails during elections. These allegations have been a point of contention in Indian politics, with many questioning the fairness and transparency of the electoral process.

Justice Khanna’s clean chit to the ECI on these allegations has sparked controversy and criticism from various quarters. Many believe that a more thorough investigation is needed to ensure the integrity of the electoral process and restore faith in the democratic system.

What is the Role of the Judiciary in Upholding Democracy?

The judiciary plays a crucial role in upholding democracy by ensuring the rule of law, protecting the rights of citizens, and overseeing the functioning of government institutions. In the case of the EVM and VVPAT scam, it is essential for the judiciary to conduct a thorough and impartial investigation to address any concerns raised by the public.

Justice Khanna’s proposal as the Next CJI raises questions about the independence and integrity of the judiciary. It is essential for the judiciary to maintain its impartiality and uphold the principles of justice to protect the democratic fabric of the country.

What are the Implications of Justice Khanna’s Appointment as the Next CJI?

The appointment of Justice Khanna as the Next CJI has significant implications for the Indian judiciary and the democratic system as a whole. It raises questions about the credibility of the judiciary and its ability to act independently in the face of political pressure.

Many are concerned that Justice Khanna’s past decisions and affiliations may compromise his ability to serve as the Chief Justice of India effectively. It is crucial for the judiciary to maintain its integrity and impartiality to ensure that justice is served and the rule of law is upheld.

In conclusion, the proposal to appoint Justice Sanjiv Khanna as the Next CJI has sparked controversy and debate about the role of the judiciary in upholding democracy. It is essential for the judiciary to act independently and impartially to ensure that justice is served and the rights of citizens are protected. Only time will tell how this proposal will play out and what impact it will have on the Indian judicial system.

Sources:
– Bar and Bench
– The Hindu
– Live Law