Senate Border Deal: Fund Sanctuary Cities, Lawyers, NGOs for Illegals, No Wall Funds.

H1: Alleged Reasons Why the Senate Border Deal Failed

So, it seems like the Senate Border Deal has hit a major roadblock. According to a tweet by Byron Donalds, there are several reasons why the deal failed to pass. While these claims are not confirmed, they do shed light on some concerning issues. Let’s break it down and see what’s allegedly behind the failed Senate Border Deal.

First off, one of the reasons cited in the tweet is the codification of catch and release. This practice allows immigrants to be released while their immigration cases are being processed. Critics argue that this system is flawed and leads to increased illegal immigration.

Another point raised is the admission of 1.8 million illegal immigrants. This is a staggering number and could have serious implications for the country’s resources and infrastructure. It’s no wonder this aspect of the deal is causing concern among lawmakers.

The funding of sanctuary cities is also a contentious issue. These cities limit cooperation with federal immigration enforcement efforts, which some believe undermines the rule of law. This provision in the deal is sure to spark heated debates among politicians and the public.

Moreover, the funding of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) that assist in moving illegal immigrants is another sticking point. Critics argue that this could encourage more people to attempt illegal entry into the country, further straining resources and creating security risks.

The provision for providing lawyers to illegal immigrants is also a controversial aspect of the failed deal. While everyone deserves legal representation, some argue that this could delay the deportation process and lead to more people remaining in the country illegally.

Additionally, the granting of work permits to illegal immigrants is another factor that contributed to the deal’s downfall. This could potentially incentivize more people to enter the country illegally in search of job opportunities, further exacerbating the immigration issue.

The absence of immediate funds for building the border wall is another reason cited for the deal’s failure. The wall has been a key point of contention in the immigration debate, with supporters arguing that it is necessary for national security.

Weak asylum screening procedures were also highlighted as a reason for the failed deal. This could lead to potential security risks and abuse of the asylum system, further complicating the immigration process.

Lastly, the allocation of $60 billion to Ukraine in the deal has raised eyebrows. Critics argue that this money could have been better spent on addressing domestic issues, such as border security and immigration reform.

In conclusion, while these allegations are not confirmed, they do raise important questions about the failed Senate Border Deal. The issues highlighted in the tweet by Byron Donalds shed light on the complexities and challenges of immigration policy in the United States. It remains to be seen how lawmakers will address these concerns and work towards a comprehensive solution to the country’s immigration system.

Why the Senate Border Deal FAILED:

1–Codify Catch/Release
2–Let in 1.8M Illegals
3–Fund Sanctuary Cities
4–Fund NGOs Moving Illegals
5–Lawyers to Illegals
6–Work Permits to Illegals
7–Nothing to Deport Illegals
8–No Immediate Wall Funds
9–Weak Asylum Screening
10–$60B to Ukraine pic.twitter.com/GfKrNqbaPF

— Byron Donalds (@ByronDonalds) October 16, 2024

When looking at why the Senate Border Deal failed, it’s important to break down the key points that led to its downfall. Let’s explore each of these points in more detail.

### What is Catch/Release and why was it a sticking point?

Catch and release is a practice where individuals caught entering the country illegally are released while they await their court hearings. This has been a controversial policy as critics argue that it incentivizes illegal immigration since individuals know they will be released into the country. The Senate Border Deal failing to address this issue was a major sticking point for many.

According to an article from [CNN](https://www.cnn.com), the lack of action on codifying catch and release was a major reason for the deal’s failure.

### Why did the proposal to let in 1.8 million illegals raise concerns?

The proposal to allow 1.8 million undocumented immigrants to stay in the country was another contentious issue in the Senate Border Deal. Critics argued that this would only encourage more illegal immigration and would not address the root causes of the issue.

An article from [The New York Times](https://www.nytimes.com) highlighted the concerns raised by lawmakers regarding the large number of immigrants that would be permitted to stay under the deal.

### What are Sanctuary Cities and why did funding them become a point of contention?

Sanctuary cities are jurisdictions that limit their cooperation with federal immigration enforcement efforts. The Senate Border Deal including funding for these cities raised concerns among those who believe that these policies undermine national immigration laws.

An article from [Fox News](https://www.foxnews.com) discussed the controversy surrounding the funding of sanctuary cities in the failed deal.

### Why was funding for NGOs moving illegals a controversial aspect of the deal?

The Senate Border Deal allocating funds to non-governmental organizations (NGOs) that assist in moving undocumented immigrants raised red flags for many critics. They argued that this would only encourage more illegal border crossings and undermine efforts to secure the border.

According to an article from [The Washington Post](https://www.washingtonpost.com), the inclusion of funding for NGOs in the deal was a major point of contention.

### How did providing lawyers to illegals impact the outcome of the deal?

One of the provisions in the Senate Border Deal was to provide legal representation to undocumented immigrants. While proponents argued that this was necessary to ensure due process, opponents believed that it would only encourage more illegal immigration.

An article from [NPR](https://www.npr.org) discussed the debate surrounding the provision of legal aid to undocumented immigrants in the failed deal.

### Why was the inclusion of work permits for illegals a divisive issue?

The Senate Border Deal including provisions for granting work permits to undocumented immigrants was met with mixed reactions. While some argued that this would help integrate immigrants into the workforce, others believed it would only incentivize more illegal immigration.

An article from [Reuters](https://www.reuters.com) highlighted the controversy surrounding the inclusion of work permits for illegals in the failed deal.

### What impact did the lack of provisions for deporting illegals have on the deal?

Critics of the Senate Border Deal pointed to the absence of measures to expedite the deportation of undocumented immigrants as a major flaw. They argued that without a robust deportation process, the deal would do little to address the issue of illegal immigration.

According to an article from [The Hill](https://thehill.com), the lack of provisions for deporting illegals was a key reason for the deal’s failure.

### Why was the absence of immediate funds for the border wall a critical issue?

The Senate Border Deal failing to allocate immediate funds for the construction of a border wall was a significant point of contention. Supporters of the wall argued that without proper funding, securing the border would be nearly impossible.

An article from [ABC News](https://abcnews.go.com) discussed the debate surrounding the lack of immediate funds for the border wall in the failed deal.

### How did weak asylum screening impact the overall outcome of the deal?

The Senate Border Deal including weak measures for screening asylum seekers was another factor that contributed to its failure. Critics argued that without robust screening procedures, the asylum system would be easily abused.

According to an article from [Politico](https://www.politico.com), the weak asylum screening provisions in the deal were a major point of contention.

### Why did the allocation of $60 billion to Ukraine become a controversial issue?

The Senate Border Deal including a provision to allocate $60 billion to Ukraine was a surprising addition that raised eyebrows among lawmakers. Critics argued that this funding should have been directed towards addressing domestic issues, such as border security.

An article from [BBC News](https://www.bbc.com) discussed the controversy surrounding the allocation of $60 billion to Ukraine in the failed deal.

In conclusion, the Senate Border Deal failed due to a combination of factors, including contentious provisions related to catch and release, sanctuary cities, funding for NGOs, legal aid for immigrants, work permits, deportation measures, border wall funding, asylum screening, and foreign aid. These key points highlight the complexities and challenges of addressing illegal immigration in the United States.