Biden-Harris Admit Afghan Terror Plotter Skipped Vetting

The Biden-Harris administration has allegedly come forward with a shocking admission regarding an Afghan national accused of planning a terror attack on election day. According to a tweet from Jacqui Heinrich, Nasir Ahmad Tawhedi was never properly vetted or approved by the State Department for special considerations, contrary to previous claims made by the administration. This revelation raises serious concerns about the effectiveness of the vetting process for individuals entering the country, especially those with potentially malicious intentions.

The news of Tawhedi slipping through the cracks of the vetting process is particularly alarming given the current global security climate. With the threat of terrorism looming large in many parts of the world, it is crucial that thorough and rigorous vetting procedures are in place to prevent individuals with nefarious intentions from gaining entry into the United States. The fact that Tawhedi was able to evade these procedures raises questions about the adequacy of the current system and the potential risks it poses to national security.

The admission by the Biden-Harris administration sheds light on the challenges and complexities of vetting individuals from countries with a history of terrorism or political instability. While it is important to uphold the principles of compassion and humanitarianism, it is equally important to prioritize the safety and security of American citizens. The failure to properly vet Tawhedi highlights the delicate balance that must be struck between these competing priorities and the need for constant vigilance in the face of evolving threats.

The implications of this revelation extend beyond the immediate security concerns raised by Tawhedi’s case. It also calls into question the credibility and reliability of the vetting process as a whole. If individuals with potentially dangerous intentions can slip through undetected, it undermines the integrity of the system and erodes public trust in the government’s ability to protect its citizens. This could have far-reaching consequences for national security and the overall effectiveness of immigration policies.

In light of this development, it is imperative that the Biden-Harris administration takes swift and decisive action to address any gaps or shortcomings in the vetting process. This may involve implementing additional safeguards, enhancing collaboration between agencies responsible for vetting, or reviewing and updating existing protocols to ensure that individuals with malicious intent are not able to exploit loopholes in the system. The safety and security of the American people must always be the top priority, and any lapses in the vetting process must be rectified without delay.

As the details of Tawhedi’s case continue to unfold, it is important for the public to remain vigilant and informed about the potential risks posed by individuals who seek to do harm. While not all individuals from countries with a history of terrorism are a threat, it is essential to exercise caution and diligence in vetting those who seek entry into the country. The Biden-Harris administration’s admission regarding Tawhedi serves as a stark reminder of the challenges and complexities inherent in ensuring national security in an increasingly interconnected world.

NEWS: The Biden-Harris administration now admits that an Afghan national accused of plotting an election day terror attack did not undergo certain vetting they previously claimed he passed. Nasir Ahmad Tawhedi was never vetted or approved by the State Department for special…

— Jacqui Heinrich (@JacquiHeinrich) October 16, 2024

When it comes to national security, the vetting process for individuals entering the United States is crucial. Recently, there has been a concerning revelation regarding an Afghan national named Nasir Ahmad Tawhedi, who was accused of plotting a terror attack on election day. The Biden-Harris administration has admitted that Tawhedi did not undergo the proper vetting process that they initially claimed he had passed. This raises questions about the effectiveness of the vetting procedures in place and the potential risks posed by individuals who slip through the cracks.

### Who is Nasir Ahmad Tawhedi?

Nasir Ahmad Tawhedi is an Afghan national who was accused of plotting a terror attack on election day. Despite previous claims by the Biden-Harris administration that Tawhedi had passed the vetting process, it has now been revealed that he was never vetted or approved by the State Department for special entry into the United States. This raises concerns about how Tawhedi was able to enter the country without undergoing the necessary security checks.

### What is the Vetting Process?

The vetting process is a series of security checks and screenings that individuals must undergo before entering the United States. This process is designed to identify any potential threats or risks posed by individuals seeking entry into the country. The vetting process typically includes background checks, interviews, and screenings to determine an individual’s eligibility to enter the United States.

### How Did Tawhedi Slip Through the Cracks?

It is unclear how Nasir Ahmad Tawhedi was able to enter the United States without undergoing the proper vetting process. The Biden-Harris administration has admitted that Tawhedi was never vetted or approved by the State Department for special entry. This raises questions about potential loopholes or failures in the vetting process that allowed Tawhedi to slip through the cracks and potentially pose a security threat to the country.

### What are the Implications of this Revelation?

The revelation that Nasir Ahmad Tawhedi did not undergo the proper vetting process has significant implications for national security. It calls into question the effectiveness of the current vetting procedures in place and highlights the potential risks posed by individuals who are not properly screened before entering the country. This revelation underscores the importance of thorough and rigorous vetting processes to ensure the safety and security of the United States.

### Conclusion

In conclusion, the admission by the Biden-Harris administration that Nasir Ahmad Tawhedi did not undergo the proper vetting process raises serious concerns about national security. The vetting process is crucial for identifying and mitigating potential security threats, and the failure to properly screen individuals like Tawhedi can have serious consequences. Moving forward, it is essential that the vetting process is strengthened and improved to prevent individuals from slipping through the cracks and posing a risk to the country.