821,000 Children Studied: Half Opt Out of 2nd Dose, Risk Myocarditis Without Benefit

In a recent tweet by Mary Talley Bowden MD, a concerning claim has been made regarding the vaccination of children in England. According to the tweet, 821,000 children were studied, with half of them choosing to opt out of receiving the second dose of the vaccine. The tweet states that cases of myocarditis and pericarditis were only observed in children who received the shots, while no deaths from COVID occurred in either group. The tweet goes on to suggest that the risks of vaccination outweigh the benefits, and implies that profits are being prioritized over safety. The tweet concludes by stating that no child should receive these shots.

This claim raises important questions and concerns about the safety and efficacy of vaccinations for children. While it is crucial to prioritize the health and well-being of our youth, it is also essential to critically examine the validity of such claims before drawing any conclusions. It is important to note that the tweet does not provide any scientific evidence or sources to support these assertions, so it is essential to approach this information with caution.

The issue of vaccination has been a contentious topic in recent years, with conflicting opinions and information circulating in the media and online platforms. It is essential to rely on reputable sources and scientific studies when making decisions about healthcare, especially when it comes to the health of our children.

The tweet by Mary Talley Bowden MD underscores the importance of transparency, accountability, and thorough research when it comes to public health policies and decisions. It is crucial for healthcare professionals, policymakers, and the public to engage in open and honest discussions about vaccination, weighing the potential risks and benefits in a balanced and informed manner.

As we navigate the complexities of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, it is crucial to prioritize the safety and well-being of our children. Vaccination has been a crucial tool in combating the spread of the virus and protecting vulnerable populations. However, it is also important to address any concerns or uncertainties that individuals may have regarding the vaccine and to provide accurate information to help individuals make informed decisions about their health.

In conclusion, while the tweet by Mary Talley Bowden MD raises important questions about the vaccination of children in England, it is essential to approach this information with critical thinking and a discerning eye. It is important to rely on reputable sources, scientific evidence, and expert guidance when making decisions about healthcare for ourselves and our children. By engaging in open and honest discussions and promoting transparency and accountability, we can work together to ensure the health and well-being of our communities.

821,000 children studied in England.
*Half of them opted out of 2nd dose.
Myocarditis and pericarditis only seen in children who received the shots.
*No deaths from C0VID in either group.
All risk, no benefit. Profits over safety.
*No child should receive these shots. pic.twitter.com/9l3jE2JRDg

— Mary Talley Bowden MD (@MdBreathe) October 13, 2024

When it comes to the health and well-being of our children, it’s only natural for parents to have concerns and questions about the decisions being made regarding their medical care. Recently, a tweet by Mary Talley Bowden MD has sparked a conversation about the vaccination of children in England. Let’s delve into this topic further by exploring the key points raised in the tweet.

Why did half of the 821,000 children studied in England opt out of the 2nd dose?

The fact that half of the children studied in England chose not to receive the second dose of the vaccine raises some important questions. Could it be due to concerns about the potential side effects of the vaccine? Or perhaps there was a lack of information provided to parents about the benefits of receiving the second dose. It’s crucial to understand the reasons behind this decision in order to address any underlying issues and ensure that children are receiving the best possible care.

In a situation like this, it’s essential to seek out reliable sources of information to gain a better understanding of the risks and benefits associated with vaccination. One such source is the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), which provides comprehensive information about vaccine safety and effectiveness. By arming ourselves with accurate information, we can make informed decisions about the health of our children.

Why were myocarditis and pericarditis only seen in children who received the shots?

The tweet highlights a concerning trend – the fact that cases of myocarditis and pericarditis were only observed in children who received the vaccine. This raises questions about the safety of the vaccine and whether proper precautions were taken to monitor and address any potential side effects. It’s crucial for healthcare providers to closely monitor patients after vaccination and be prepared to address any adverse reactions that may occur.

To gain a deeper understanding of the potential risks associated with vaccination, it’s important to consult reputable sources such as the World Health Organization (WHO). The WHO provides detailed information about vaccine safety and works to ensure that vaccines meet rigorous standards before being approved for use. By staying informed and seeking out reliable sources of information, we can make informed decisions about the health of our children.

Why were there no deaths from COVID in either group?

One striking point raised in the tweet is the fact that there were no deaths from COVID in either group of children studied. This raises questions about the necessity of vaccinating children when the risk of severe illness or death from COVID appears to be low. It’s important to weigh the potential benefits of vaccination against the risks and consider whether alternative measures, such as mask-wearing and social distancing, may be more appropriate in certain situations.

To gain a better understanding of the risks and benefits associated with COVID vaccination, it’s important to consult reputable sources such as the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The NIH provides evidence-based information about COVID vaccines and works to support research that advances our understanding of the virus. By seeking out reliable sources of information, we can make informed decisions about the health of our children.

In conclusion, the tweet by Mary Talley Bowden MD raises important questions about the vaccination of children in England. By exploring these questions and seeking out reliable sources of information, we can gain a better understanding of the risks and benefits associated with vaccination. It’s crucial to stay informed and make decisions based on evidence-based information to ensure the health and well-being of our children.