Trump dodges real questions, opts for friendly media.

In the world of politics, the way candidates conduct interviews and interact with the media can say a lot about their character and intentions. A recent tweet by Neera Tanden sheds light on what she perceives as a double standard in how Kamala Harris and Donald Trump are judged based on their interview choices. According to Tanden, Trump has canceled appearances on reputable shows like 60 Minutes and refuses to participate in debates, opting instead to do interviews with media outlets that align with his beliefs.

This alleged behavior by Trump raises questions about his willingness to engage with diverse perspectives and address tough questions. By contrast, Tanden suggests that Kamala Harris is held to a different standard, expected to participate in a variety of interviews and debates to prove her readiness for the role of Vice President.

The tweet brings up an interesting point about the role of the media in shaping public perception of political candidates. When candidates choose to only engage with friendly or like-minded media outlets, it can create an echo chamber effect where their views are never challenged or scrutinized. On the other hand, participating in a diverse range of interviews and debates can show a candidate’s willingness to engage with different perspectives and address tough questions.

It’s worth considering whether Trump’s interview choices reflect a lack of transparency or a reluctance to engage with challenging topics. By refusing to participate in debates and canceling appearances on respected shows like 60 Minutes, he may be avoiding scrutiny and accountability. In contrast, Kamala Harris’s willingness to engage in a variety of interviews and debates could be seen as a sign of her commitment to transparency and accountability.

The tweet also raises questions about the role of the media in shaping public perception of political candidates. When candidates choose to only engage with friendly or like-minded media outlets, it can create an echo chamber effect where their views are never challenged or scrutinized. On the other hand, participating in a diverse range of interviews and debates can show a candidate’s willingness to engage with different perspectives and address tough questions.

In conclusion, the alleged double standard in how Kamala Harris and Donald Trump are judged based on their interview choices highlights the importance of transparency, accountability, and willingness to engage with diverse perspectives in the political arena. As voters, it’s crucial to pay attention to how candidates interact with the media and make informed decisions based on their willingness to address tough questions and engage in open dialogue.

If the “interviews” debate doesn’t show the double standard Kamala is judged by, nothing will.
Trump canceled 60 minutes
Refuses to do another debate
Does all his interviews with sycophantic wing nut media

Is he sitting down with MSNBC hosts?
Doing press that hits undecided… https://t.co/5k0TUIHgcS

— Neera Tanden (@neeratanden) October 7, 2024

When it comes to the topic of interviews and political double standards, there are many questions that come to mind. Let’s delve into some of these questions and explore the nuances of the issue at hand.

### Why is the Debate Over Interviews Important?

The debate over interviews is important because it sheds light on the double standards that politicians, particularly women politicians, face in the media. Kamala Harris, the first female Vice President of the United States, is often judged by a different set of standards compared to her male counterparts. This double standard becomes glaringly evident when we compare how President Trump handles interviews versus how Vice President Harris is treated in the media.

### How Does Trump Handle Interviews?

President Trump has a history of canceling interviews and avoiding debates. He famously canceled his interview with “60 Minutes” and refused to participate in another debate during the 2020 presidential campaign. Instead, he often chooses to do interviews with media outlets that are known for their biased and sycophantic coverage of his administration.

### What About Vice President Harris?

In contrast, Vice President Harris is often held to a different standard when it comes to interviews. Despite being a seasoned politician and a former prosecutor, she is frequently criticized for her interview style and approach. She is often grilled by interviewers and held to a higher standard compared to her male counterparts.

### Is There a Double Standard in Media Coverage?

The double standard in media coverage becomes even more apparent when we look at the types of media outlets that President Trump and Vice President Harris choose to engage with. While President Trump often gravitates towards media outlets that cater to his base and provide favorable coverage, Vice President Harris is more likely to engage with mainstream media outlets that have a broader reach.

### How Does This Impact Public Perception?

The way politicians handle interviews and media coverage can have a significant impact on public perception. When politicians refuse to engage with tough interviewers or avoid debates, it can create the perception that they have something to hide or are not willing to engage in open dialogue. On the other hand, politicians who are willing to engage with a variety of media outlets can be seen as more transparent and accountable to the public.

### What Can Be Done to Address This Double Standard?

Addressing the double standard in media coverage will require a concerted effort from both politicians and the media. Politicians should be willing to engage with a diverse range of media outlets and be open to tough questions and scrutiny. At the same time, media outlets should strive to provide fair and balanced coverage that holds all politicians to the same standard, regardless of their gender or political affiliation.

In conclusion, the debate over interviews and political double standards is an important one that highlights the need for greater transparency and accountability in our political system. By addressing these issues head-on, we can work towards a more equitable and inclusive media landscape that holds all politicians to the same standard.

Sources:
– [CNN – Trump cancels ’60 Minutes’ interview](https://www.cnn.com/2020/10/20/media/trump-60-minutes-interview/index.html)
– [Politico – Trump refuses to do virtual debate](https://www.politico.com/news/2020/10/08/trump-wont-do-virtual-debate-428262)
– [NBC News – Kamala Harris faces sexism in media coverage](https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/kamala-harris-faces-sexism-media-how-we-talk-about-her-ncna1256822)