Original Ending of ‘JOKER’ Revealed: Joaquin Phoenix’s Joker Carves Smile in Front of Supporters

In a recent alleged revelation, it has been reported that the original ending of the movie ‘JOKER’ featured Joaquin Phoenix’s Joker character carving a smile on his face in front of a crowd of his supporters. This shocking detail was revealed by THR, leaving fans stunned at the thought of such a dark and twisted ending. However, it seems that this ending was ultimately scrapped due to the intervention of none other than Christopher Nolan, the acclaimed director behind the ‘The Dark Knight’ trilogy.

According to reports, Christopher Nolan believed that only his Joker, portrayed by the late Heath Ledger, should be the one to carve his face. This decision by Nolan sheds light on the level of detail and respect he has for the characters in his films, especially when it comes to such iconic and complex roles like the Joker. It also speaks to the deep connection he had with Heath Ledger’s portrayal of the character, which is still considered one of the best performances in cinematic history.

You may also like to watch : Who Is Kamala Harris? Biography - Parents - Husband - Sister - Career - Indian - Jamaican Heritage

The news of this original ending has sparked a debate among fans and critics alike, with many wondering what could have been if the scene had made it to the final cut of the film. Would Joaquin Phoenix’s Joker have been able to match the intensity and darkness of Heath Ledger’s portrayal? Or would it have been seen as a cheap imitation of a classic moment in cinema history? These are questions that will likely never be answered, but they do add an interesting layer to the legacy of the Joker character in film.

While it is always fascinating to hear about the behind-the-scenes decisions that shape the final product we see on screen, it is also important to remember that these are just rumors and speculation at this point. Without concrete evidence or confirmation from the filmmakers themselves, we can only take these reports with a grain of salt and appreciate the film for what it is.

Regardless of whether this alleged original ending would have worked or not, ‘JOKER’ remains a groundbreaking film that pushed the boundaries of the superhero genre and provided a thought-provoking look into the psyche of one of the most iconic villains in comic book history. Joaquin Phoenix’s performance as the Joker has been universally praised, earning him numerous awards and accolades, including an Academy Award for Best Actor.

In the end, it is the final product that matters most, and ‘JOKER’ stands as a testament to the power of storytelling and the impact that a well-crafted film can have on its audience. Whether or not we ever see the original ending that was allegedly scrapped, the legacy of the Joker character will continue to captivate and intrigue audiences for years to come.

What was the original ending of ‘Joker’?

The original ending of the movie ‘Joker’ reportedly featured Joaquin Phoenix’s character, the Joker, carving a smile on his face in front of a crowd of his supporters. This ending was meant to symbolize the transformation of Arthur Fleck into the iconic comic book villain. However, according to reports from The Hollywood Reporter, director Christopher Nolan opposed this idea, believing that only his Joker, portrayed by Heath Ledger in ‘The Dark Knight,’ should have the signature smile carved into his face.

Why did Christopher Nolan oppose the original ending?

Christopher Nolan’s decision to veto the original ending of ‘Joker’ stems from his belief that each iteration of the Joker should have its own unique characteristics and defining moments. By having Joaquin Phoenix’s Joker also carve a smile on his face, it would diminish the impact and significance of Heath Ledger’s portrayal in ‘The Dark Knight.’ Nolan likely wanted to preserve the integrity of his version of the Joker and ensure that it remained distinct from other interpretations.

How did fans react to Christopher Nolan’s decision?

The news of Christopher Nolan’s intervention in the ending of ‘Joker’ sparked mixed reactions among fans and critics. Some praised Nolan for his dedication to preserving the legacy of Heath Ledger’s Joker and maintaining the integrity of his vision. Others, however, expressed disappointment that they would not get to see Joaquin Phoenix’s Joker perform the iconic smile carving scene, which could have added a new layer of complexity to the character.

What impact did Christopher Nolan’s decision have on the film?

While it is impossible to know for certain how ‘Joker’ would have been received with the original ending, Christopher Nolan’s influence likely shaped the final product significantly. By vetoing the smile carving scene, Nolan ensured that each portrayal of the Joker would remain distinct and memorable in its own right. This decision may have also helped ‘Joker’ stand out as a standalone film rather than being overshadowed by comparisons to previous iterations of the character.

In conclusion, Christopher Nolan’s decision to veto the original ending of ‘Joker’ demonstrates his commitment to maintaining the integrity and uniqueness of his version of the Joker. While some fans may have been disappointed by the absence of the smile carving scene, Nolan’s influence likely contributed to the film’s overall success and critical acclaim.

Sources:
– The Hollywood Reporter
– CBR
– Screen Rant