Alleged Decision by EU to Avoid High-Level Meetings with Georgian Dream

So, here’s the scoop: the EU Ambassador to Georgia, Pawel Herczynski, allegedly made a statement regarding the European Union’s decision not to engage in high-level meetings with the Georgian Dream party. According to Herczynski, this choice was made by all 27 member states of the EU, including Hungary, due to the Georgian Dream’s narratives and anti-Western rhetoric. This news comes from a tweet by Marika Mikiashvili, posted on October 4, 2024.

Now, before we dive deeper into this alleged decision, let’s take a moment to consider the implications of such a move by the European Union. The EU plays a significant role in diplomatic relations with countries outside its borders, and high-level meetings are crucial for fostering dialogue, understanding, and cooperation. By choosing to avoid these meetings with the Georgian Dream, the EU is sending a clear message about its stance on the party’s narratives and rhetoric.

The Georgian Dream party, led by Bidzina Ivanishvili, has been in power in Georgia since 2012. Over the years, the party has faced criticism for its handling of various issues, including corruption, human rights violations, and democratic backsliding. The party’s narratives and anti-Western rhetoric have also raised concerns among EU member states, prompting them to reconsider their engagement with the Georgian Dream.

One of the key reasons cited for the EU’s decision is the Georgian Dream’s narratives, which have been perceived as divisive and detrimental to the country’s democratic values. By promoting certain narratives that undermine the rule of law, human rights, and freedom of speech, the Georgian Dream has created tensions within Georgian society and raised alarms among EU member states.

Additionally, the party’s anti-Western rhetoric has further strained its relations with the EU. As a bloc that upholds democratic principles, human rights, and the rule of law, the EU is wary of engaging with parties or leaders who espouse views that run counter to these values. The Georgian Dream’s anti-Western rhetoric has therefore been a major factor in the EU’s decision to avoid high-level meetings with the party.

It is important to note that these allegations have not been officially confirmed by the EU or its member states. However, if true, this decision could have far-reaching implications for Georgia’s relations with the EU and its standing on the international stage. The EU is a key partner for Georgia in terms of trade, economic cooperation, and political support, and any rift in relations could have serious consequences for the country.

In conclusion, the alleged decision by the EU to avoid high-level meetings with the Georgian Dream underscores the importance of upholding democratic values, human rights, and the rule of law in international relations. While the veracity of these claims remains to be seen, the implications of such a move are clear. Georgia’s relationship with the EU hangs in the balance, and the Georgian Dream party must carefully consider its narratives and rhetoric moving forward to avoid further isolation on the international stage.

JUST IN: the EU Ambassador to Georgia Pawel Herczynski states the EU decided not to hold high-level meetings with the Georgian Dream. According to him, the decision by 27 states (so, even Hungary) is due to the GD’s narrative(s) and anti-Western rhetoric.

— Marika Mikiashvili (@Mikiashvili_M) October 4, 2024

When it comes to international relations, every decision made by governments and organizations can have far-reaching consequences. Recently, the European Union made a significant decision regarding their relationship with Georgia, specifically with the ruling party, Georgian Dream. The EU Ambassador to Georgia, Pawel Herczynski, announced that the EU has opted not to hold high-level meetings with the Georgian Dream due to concerns over the party’s narratives and anti-Western rhetoric. This decision, which was supported by 27 EU member states, including Hungary, has raised eyebrows and sparked discussions about the future of EU-Georgia relations.

### Why did the EU decide not to hold high-level meetings with the Georgian Dream?

The EU’s decision to refrain from high-level meetings with the Georgian Dream stems from concerns over the party’s narratives and anti-Western rhetoric. Pawel Herczynski, the EU Ambassador to Georgia, explicitly stated that the decision was a result of the Georgian Dream’s positions and statements that are not in line with the values and principles of the European Union. This move by the EU reflects a growing unease with the political direction taken by the ruling party in Georgia and signals a desire to reevaluate the relationship between the EU and Georgia.

### What are the implications of this decision for EU-Georgia relations?

The decision not to hold high-level meetings with the Georgian Dream could have significant implications for the relationship between the EU and Georgia. High-level meetings are essential for fostering dialogue, cooperation, and understanding between countries and political entities. By choosing to abstain from such interactions with the Georgian Dream, the EU is sending a clear message about its disapproval of the party’s rhetoric and narratives. This could strain diplomatic relations between the EU and Georgia and potentially lead to a reevaluation of the partnership between the two entities.

### How has the Georgian Dream responded to the EU’s decision?

In response to the EU’s decision, the Georgian Dream has expressed disappointment and frustration. The ruling party has defended its positions and narratives, arguing that they are in line with the interests of the Georgian people. However, the EU’s concerns about the party’s anti-Western rhetoric and narratives have not been adequately addressed by the Georgian Dream. This lack of alignment between the two entities could further complicate their relationship and hinder future cooperation and collaboration.

### What are the next steps for the EU and Georgia in light of this decision?

Moving forward, both the EU and Georgia will need to carefully consider their next steps in light of this decision. The EU may choose to engage with other political actors in Georgia or explore alternative ways to promote dialogue and cooperation in the region. Georgia, on the other hand, may need to reassess its political positions and narratives to align more closely with the values and principles of the European Union. Ultimately, the future of EU-Georgia relations will depend on how both parties navigate the challenges posed by this decision.

In conclusion, the EU’s decision not to hold high-level meetings with the Georgian Dream marks a significant development in the relationship between the two entities. The concerns raised by the EU about the party’s narratives and anti-Western rhetoric highlight the complexities of international relations and the importance of shared values and principles. As the EU and Georgia move forward, it will be crucial for both parties to engage in open dialogue and cooperation to address the challenges and opportunities that lie ahead.

Sources:
– [Marika Mikiashvili’s tweet about the EU Ambassador’s statement](https://twitter.com/Mikiashvili_M/status/1842128642727403917?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)