DOJ IG delay on FBI assets in J6 case: calculated and destructive

In a recent tweet by Julie Kelly, a controversial claim was made about the Department of Justice Inspector General delaying a report on the use of FBI assets. According to the tweet, this delay was described as “calculated and destructive.” The tweet also mentioned that judges have consistently protected the FBI on this issue and have denied entrapment motions filed by J6 defendants. Additionally, judges have reportedly refused to compel testimony from individuals with information related to the case.

This allegation, if true, raises serious concerns about the integrity of the justice system and the treatment of individuals involved in the J6 incident. The claim that the DOJ IG deliberately delayed the report for nefarious reasons suggests a potential cover-up or manipulation of information. If judges are indeed protecting the FBI and denying motions that could potentially expose wrongdoing, it calls into question the fairness of the legal process for J6 defendants.

The implications of these allegations are significant and could have far-reaching consequences. If the DOJ IG report is being delayed for political reasons or to protect certain individuals or institutions, it undermines the trust and credibility of the justice system. It also raises concerns about the potential for abuse of power and the lack of accountability for those in positions of authority.

The refusal of judges to compel testimony from individuals who may have relevant information further complicates the situation. If key witnesses are not being allowed to testify, it could prevent the full truth from coming to light and hinder the ability to ensure justice is served in the J6 cases. This lack of transparency and openness in the legal process is troubling and could erode public confidence in the fairness of the system.

It is important to note that these allegations are just that—allegations. There is no concrete evidence provided in the tweet to support the claims made by Julie Kelly. However, the seriousness of the accusations warrants further investigation and scrutiny. The public has a right to know if there is any truth to these claims and if there are any actions being taken to address any potential misconduct or malpractice.

In conclusion, the allegations made in the tweet by Julie Kelly are concerning and raise important questions about the integrity of the justice system in relation to the J6 incident. The delay of the DOJ IG report, the protection of the FBI by judges, and the refusal to compel testimony all point to potential issues that need to be addressed. It is essential that transparency, fairness, and accountability are maintained in the legal process to ensure that justice is served and trust in the system is upheld.

Text from a J6er today.

Which is why DOJ IG delayed report on use of FBI assets is so calculated and destructive.

Judges have routinely protected FBI on this issue and denied the few entrapment motions filed by J6 defendants. Judges also refuse to compel testimony from known… pic.twitter.com/kIijQgyKe7

— Julie Kelly (@julie_kelly2) September 26, 2024

When looking at the image shared on twitter by Julie Kelly, it is clear that there is a lot of controversy surrounding the actions of the DOJ IG and FBI in relation to the events of January 6th. Let’s delve deeper into this issue by asking some pertinent questions that can help shed light on the situation.

### Who are the J6ers and what are they saying?
The text from a J6er shared in the tweet highlights their frustration with the delayed report on the use of FBI assets by the DOJ IG. This delay is seen as calculated and destructive by the J6er. What are the specific concerns raised by the J6ers regarding the actions of the DOJ IG and FBI?

### Why was the report on FBI assets delayed?
The tweet mentions that the report on the use of FBI assets was delayed by the DOJ IG. What are the reasons behind this delay? Are there any implications of this delay on the ongoing investigations into the events of January 6th?

### How have judges been involved in this issue?
The tweet also mentions that judges have routinely protected the FBI on this issue and have denied entrapment motions filed by J6 defendants. Why have judges taken this stance? What factors have influenced their decisions in cases related to January 6th?

### What is the significance of compelling testimony from known individuals?
The tweet suggests that judges have refused to compel testimony from known individuals. Why is it important to compel testimony from these individuals? What role could their testimony play in uncovering the truth behind the events of January 6th?

### What impact does this controversy have on the perception of the DOJ and FBI?
The actions of the DOJ IG and FBI in relation to January 6th have sparked controversy and raised questions about their accountability. How does this controversy impact the public’s perception of these institutions? What steps can be taken to address concerns and restore trust in the DOJ and FBI?

As we explore these questions, it becomes clear that there are complex issues at play in the aftermath of January 6th. The actions of the DOJ IG, FBI, and judges have come under scrutiny, and there is a need for transparency and accountability in the handling of investigations related to this pivotal moment in American history.

In conclusion, the controversy surrounding the delayed report on FBI assets and the actions of judges in cases related to January 6th highlight the challenges faced in seeking justice and accountability. It is essential that these issues are addressed in a thorough and transparent manner to uphold the principles of democracy and the rule of law.

Sources:
– [Twitter post by Julie Kelly](https://twitter.com/julie_kelly2/status/1839092745962504238?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)