Rep Massie grills Horowitz on Jan 6 report pause; FBI informants revealed.

In a recent alleged development, Representative Tom Massie questioned Inspector General Michael Horowitz about the status of the January 6th report. According to a tweet by Julie Kelly, Horowitz revealed that he had initially started the review but had to pause it due to an ongoing criminal investigation by the Department of Justice. However, he resumed the review last year and mentioned that a draft is now ready, which will reportedly include information about FBI informants present during the events of January 6th, 2024.

This alleged revelation by Horowitz raises several intriguing questions about the events surrounding January 6th and the role of law enforcement agencies during that tumultuous time. The inclusion of information about FBI informants in the upcoming draft could potentially shed new light on the events leading up to and following the Capitol riot, providing a deeper understanding of the situation.

The fact that the review was paused due to a criminal investigation by the DOJ adds a layer of complexity to the situation, indicating that there may have been significant legal implications involved. The decision to resume the review despite the ongoing investigation suggests that Horowitz deemed it important to continue the inquiry and provide a comprehensive report on the matter.

The timing of this alleged revelation is also noteworthy, as it comes at a time when the events of January 6th remain a subject of intense debate and scrutiny. The inclusion of information about FBI informants in the draft report could potentially have far-reaching implications for the ongoing investigations into the Capitol riot and the actions of law enforcement agencies during that time.

Overall, this alleged development highlights the importance of transparency and accountability in government investigations, particularly when it comes to sensitive and high-profile incidents such as the January 6th Capitol riot. The upcoming release of the draft report by Horowitz could potentially provide valuable insights into the events of that day and the actions taken by law enforcement agencies, shedding new light on a dark chapter in American history.

As the public eagerly awaits the release of the draft report and the inclusion of information about FBI informants, it is essential to approach the findings with a critical eye and an open mind. The revelations contained in the report could have significant implications for the ongoing investigations and the public’s understanding of the events of January 6th, underscoring the importance of thorough and impartial government inquiries into such matters.

In conclusion, the alleged statement by Horowitz regarding the January 6th report and the inclusion of information about FBI informants is a significant development that could potentially have far-reaching implications. As the draft report nears completion, it is crucial for the public to stay informed and engaged with the findings, ensuring that accountability and transparency are upheld in government investigations into sensitive and high-profile incidents.

Rep Tom Massie asking Horowitz about Jan 6 report.

Horowitz said he started review and then “paused” the review due to DOJ criminal investigation.

He restarted it last year.

Horowitz says a draft is ready and will include info on FBI informants on Jam 6.

— Julie Kelly (@julie_kelly2) September 25, 2024

When it comes to the events surrounding January 6th, 2021, there are still many questions that remain unanswered. Recently, Rep. Tom Massie asked Inspector General Michael Horowitz about the status of the report regarding the events of that day. Horowitz revealed some intriguing information about the review process, shedding light on why there have been delays in releasing the report. Let’s delve deeper into this topic by exploring some key questions related to the conversation between Massie and Horowitz.

### What prompted the pause in the review process?

According to Horowitz, he initially started the review of the events of January 6th, but he had to pause the process due to an ongoing criminal investigation by the Department of Justice. This pause was necessary to ensure that the review did not interfere with the DOJ’s investigation. The decision to halt the review demonstrates the complexity and sensitivity of the situation surrounding the events of that day.

### Why was the review restarted last year?

After the DOJ’s criminal investigation concluded, Horowitz was able to restart the review process last year. This decision suggests that there were no longer any impediments to conducting an independent review of the events of January 6th. By resuming the review, Horowitz is signaling a commitment to providing a comprehensive and thorough examination of what transpired on that fateful day.

### What can we expect from the upcoming report?

Horowitz mentioned that a draft of the report is ready and will include information about FBI informants present during the events of January 6th. This revelation raises important questions about the role of informants in the events leading up to and on January 6th. The inclusion of this information in the report suggests that there may have been more complexities and nuances to the events of that day than initially perceived.

As we await the release of the report, it is essential to consider the implications of the information that will be contained within it. The presence of FBI informants raises questions about the extent of their involvement in the events of January 6th and whether their actions had any impact on the outcome of the day. By examining these details, we may gain a better understanding of the factors that contributed to the events of January 6th.

In conclusion, the conversation between Rep. Tom Massie and Inspector General Michael Horowitz provides valuable insights into the ongoing review of the events of January 6th, 2021. The decision to pause and restart the review process, as well as the inclusion of information about FBI informants, underscores the complexity of the situation. As we eagerly anticipate the release of the report, it is crucial to consider the significance of the details that will be revealed and the impact they may have on our understanding of what transpired on that day.

For more information on this topic, you can refer to the original tweet by Julie Kelly [here](https://twitter.com/julie_kelly2/status/1838964875554406514?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw). Stay tuned for updates on the release of the report and further analysis of its findings.