Horowitz’s Office Paused Inquiry Amid Criminal Investigation

In a recent tweet by Julie Kelly, an alleged claim by Horowitz has sparked controversy and demands an answer. According to the tweet, Horowitz claimed that his office paused an internal inquiry to avoid interference with an ongoing criminal investigation, only to restart it last year. The tweet suggests that this may be in reference to the J6 select committee’s investigation rather than the DOJ, as the DOJ/FBI overall J6 criminal investigation seems to be the focus. While this claim is circulating on social media, it is important to note that there is no concrete proof to support it.

The alleged actions of pausing and restarting an internal inquiry raise questions about the motivations behind such decisions. If Horowitz did indeed put a hold on the inquiry to avoid interfering with a criminal investigation, it begs the question of what that investigation entails and why it was deemed necessary to pause the internal inquiry. Additionally, the decision to restart the inquiry after a period of time raises concerns about the timing and potential implications of such actions.

The mention of the J6 select committee’s investigation adds another layer of complexity to the situation. The committee’s probe into the events of January 6th and its aftermath has been a focal point of political discourse, with implications for both the current administration and the previous one. If Horowitz’s actions are indeed related to this investigation, it could have far-reaching consequences for those involved and the public perception of the events in question.

The tweet by Julie Kelly serves as a catalyst for further discussion and analysis of the alleged claim by Horowitz. Social media platforms have become a breeding ground for the dissemination of information, both true and false, and it is essential to approach such claims with a critical eye. While Twitter can be a valuable tool for sharing news and opinions, it is also important to verify the accuracy of the information being shared and to consider the potential biases of those making the claims.

As the story continues to unfold, it will be crucial to monitor developments and seek out reliable sources of information to gain a clearer understanding of the situation. Allegations of pausing and restarting internal inquiries in relation to criminal investigations are serious and warrant thorough investigation and scrutiny. In the age of social media, where news spreads rapidly and opinions are shared freely, it is more important than ever to exercise caution and discernment when consuming information online.

In conclusion, the alleged claim by Horowitz, as highlighted in Julie Kelly’s tweet, raises significant questions about the actions of government officials and the potential implications of their decisions. While the veracity of the claim remains uncertain, it is vital to approach such allegations with skepticism and to seek out reliable sources of information to separate fact from fiction. As the story continues to develop, it will be essential to stay informed and engaged in the ongoing discourse surrounding this alleged claim.

This absolutely demands an answer.

Horowitz claimed his office paused internal inquiry to not interfere in ongoing “criminal investigation.”

And restarted it last year.

It appears he is referring to J6 select committee’s investigation nor DOJ—bc DOJ/FBI overall J6 criminal… https://t.co/FV8NSv5vJi

— Julie Kelly (@julie_kelly2) September 25, 2024

When it comes to the actions of Inspector General Horowitz and the internal inquiry that was paused and restarted, there are certainly a lot of questions that demand answers. Let’s delve into the details and explore the implications of these decisions.

### What Led to the Pause in the Internal Inquiry?

One of the key questions that arises is what prompted Horowitz’s office to pause the internal inquiry in the first place. Was it truly to avoid interfering in an ongoing criminal investigation, as claimed? And if so, what was the nature of this investigation that warranted such a decision?

### How Did the Restart of the Inquiry Come About?

The decision to restart the internal inquiry last year raises its own set of questions. What prompted this change in direction? Was new information uncovered that necessitated a reevaluation of the situation? Or was it simply a matter of timing and logistics that led to the decision to resume the inquiry?

### What is the Connection to the J6 Select Committee’s Investigation?

It appears that Horowitz may have been referring to the J6 select committee’s investigation when explaining the pause and restart of the internal inquiry. How does this committee’s work tie into the actions of the Inspector General’s office? What role does the committee play in shedding light on the events that prompted the internal inquiry in the first place?

### What is the Role of the DOJ and FBI in the J6 Criminal Investigation?

Another important aspect to consider is the involvement of the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in the criminal investigation related to the events of January 6th. How do these agencies fit into the larger picture of the internal inquiry and the work of the J6 select committee? And what impact do their actions have on the overall understanding of what transpired on that day?

In order to better understand the complexities at play here, it is important to consider the context in which these actions are taking place. The events of January 6th, 2021, when a mob stormed the U.S. Capitol in an attempt to overturn the results of the presidential election, have had far-reaching consequences. The aftermath of that day has led to multiple investigations, legal proceedings, and a broader examination of the state of democracy and the rule of law in the United States.

As we seek answers to the questions raised by Horowitz’s actions regarding the internal inquiry, it is crucial to rely on credible sources that can provide insight and context. One such source is a report by The Washington Post, which delves into the complexities of the various investigations surrounding the events of January 6th. By consulting reports like these, we can gain a more comprehensive understanding of the issues at hand and the implications of the decisions being made by key figures like Inspector General Horowitz.

In conclusion, the pause and restart of the internal inquiry by Inspector General Horowitz raise important questions about the intersection of investigations into the events of January 6th. By exploring these questions and seeking out reliable sources of information, we can better grasp the significance of these actions and their impact on the ongoing efforts to uncover the truth behind that fateful day.