Speaker Johnson’s SHOCKING decision on the SAVE Act revealed!

In a recent tweet that has caused quite a stir on social media, Kyle Becker alleges that Speaker Johnson has confirmed he has no intention of attaching the SAVE Act to the budget resolution. This news comes as a shock to many, especially after Rep. Thomas Massie previously called it a disgrace.

The SAVE Act, which stands for Secure America’s Votes and Elections Act, is a piece of legislation that aims to enhance election security and ensure the integrity of the voting process. By not attaching it to the budget resolution, Speaker Johnson is essentially signaling that this important issue may not receive the attention and prioritization it deserves.

This alleged decision has sparked outrage among many who believe that election security should be a top priority for lawmakers. With the rise of cyber threats and concerns about foreign interference in elections, ensuring the integrity of the voting process is more important than ever.

The fact that Speaker Johnson has reportedly confirmed his lack of intention to attach the SAVE Act to the budget resolution is certainly troubling. It raises questions about his commitment to addressing election security and protecting the democratic process.

It is worth noting that the tweet from Kyle Becker does not provide any concrete evidence to support the claim that Speaker Johnson has made this decision. However, the fact that it has garnered so much attention and sparked debate on social media is a clear indication of the importance of the issue at hand.

In today’s political climate, where trust in institutions and elected officials is at an all-time low, transparency and accountability are more important than ever. If Speaker Johnson has indeed made this decision, it is crucial that he explains his reasoning to the public and addresses the concerns raised by those who support the SAVE Act.

As we await further clarification on this alleged decision, it is important for citizens to stay informed and engaged in the political process. Election security affects us all, and it is up to us to hold our elected officials accountable and demand action on issues that are critical to the functioning of our democracy.

In the meantime, the debate surrounding the SAVE Act and its potential attachment to the budget resolution will likely continue to unfold on social media and in the public sphere. It is a reminder of the power of social media in shaping public discourse and holding leaders accountable for their decisions.

Overall, the alleged confirmation from Speaker Johnson that he has no intention of attaching the SAVE Act to the budget resolution is a concerning development that highlights the importance of election security in today’s political landscape. As citizens, it is up to us to stay informed, engaged, and vocal in advocating for issues that matter to us and our democracy.

BREAKING.@SpeakerJohnson *CONFIRMS* he has no intention of attaching the SAVE Act to the budget resolution.

Just like @RepThomasMassie called it. What a disgrace pic.twitter.com/9Ggyoadylo

— Kyle Becker (@kylenabecker) September 22, 2024

What is the SAVE Act?

The SAVE Act is a piece of legislation that aims to strengthen border security and enforce immigration laws in the United States. It stands for Securing America’s Value and Ensuring Security Act and has been a topic of much debate in recent years. The act includes provisions for increasing border patrol agents, implementing new technology to monitor the border, and cracking down on employers who hire undocumented immigrants.

One of the key components of the SAVE Act is the requirement for all employers to use the E-Verify system to check the immigration status of their employees. This system is designed to prevent undocumented immigrants from being hired for jobs in the US. Proponents of the act argue that it is necessary to protect American jobs and prevent illegal immigration.

Why is the SAVE Act Controversial?

The SAVE Act has been a controversial topic because of its potential impact on immigration policy and border security. Critics of the act argue that it is too harsh and punitive towards undocumented immigrants. They believe that it could lead to racial profiling and discrimination in the workplace.

In addition, some opponents of the SAVE Act argue that it does not address the root causes of illegal immigration, such as economic hardship and violence in the immigrants’ home countries. They believe that a more comprehensive approach to immigration reform is needed, rather than simply increasing border security measures.

What is the Budget Resolution?

The budget resolution is a legislative tool used by Congress to set spending levels and revenue targets for the federal government. It is not a binding law, but rather a blueprint for the budget process. The resolution outlines the overall budget framework for the upcoming fiscal year, including discretionary spending caps and revenue projections.

Why is Attaching the SAVE Act to the Budget Resolution Significant?

Attaching the SAVE Act to the budget resolution would have made it more likely to pass through Congress. By including the act in the budget process, supporters could have bypassed potential opposition and expedited its approval. This strategy is often used for controversial legislation that may face challenges in a standalone vote.

What are the Implications of Not Attaching the SAVE Act to the Budget Resolution?

The decision not to attach the SAVE Act to the budget resolution is significant because it could impact the future of the legislation. Without the expedited approval process that comes with being included in the budget, the act may face more challenges in Congress. It will have to go through the regular legislative process, which could include committee hearings, amendments, and a full floor vote.

Additionally, the decision not to attach the SAVE Act to the budget resolution could signal a shift in priorities for lawmakers. It may indicate that immigration reform is not a top priority at the moment, or that there is not enough support for the act to pass through Congress. This could have implications for future immigration policy discussions and legislation.

In conclusion, the decision not to attach the SAVE Act to the budget resolution is a significant development in the ongoing debate over immigration policy in the United States. It highlights the challenges and complexities of passing legislation on such a contentious issue and raises questions about the future of immigration reform in the country.

Sources:
– Congress.gov – SAVE Act
– Congressional Budget Office – Budget Resolution