Federal law under fire as Election Day results manipulated post-election

In a tweet that has stirred controversy and speculation, Tom Fitton claimed that the outcome of the 2020 Election was possibly altered due to unprecedented and extraordinary counting that occurred after Election Day. Fitton argued that Federal law specifies Election Day, not an extended period of time like Election Week, Election Month, or even Election Winter. According to Fitton, President Donald Trump allegedly had the votes to secure his re-election on Election Day itself, but these vote totals were apparently changed amidst the post-election counting process.

The assertion made by Fitton raises eyebrows and prompts questions about the integrity of the electoral process. While it is crucial to note that these claims are merely allegations at this point, they nonetheless bring to light the potential for discrepancies that could influence the final outcome of a presidential election. The idea that votes could be altered or manipulated after the designated Election Day is certainly cause for concern and warrants further investigation and scrutiny.

The notion that President Trump had the necessary votes to win the presidency on Election Day, only to have those numbers changed through subsequent counting efforts, is a serious accusation that cannot be taken lightly. If true, it would call into question the validity and fairness of the entire electoral system, casting doubt on the accuracy and reliability of election results. In a democratic society where the will of the people is meant to be reflected through free and fair elections, any suggestion of tampering or manipulation is deeply troubling.

The implications of Fitton’s claim are far-reaching and could have significant consequences for the future of American democracy. If there is even a hint of truth to the idea that vote totals were altered after Election Day, it could undermine public trust in the electoral process and erode confidence in the legitimacy of election outcomes. The very foundation of democracy rests on the principle of free and fair elections, and any suggestion of foul play strikes at the heart of this fundamental tenet.

In the absence of concrete evidence to support Fitton’s allegations, it is essential to approach these claims with a healthy dose of skepticism and critical thinking. While it is important to consider all possibilities and remain open to the idea that electoral fraud or manipulation could occur, it is equally important to demand proof and verification before jumping to conclusions. The integrity of the electoral process is paramount, and any allegations of misconduct must be thoroughly investigated and substantiated before they can be taken seriously.

As we navigate the complex and contentious landscape of American politics, it is imperative that we uphold the principles of transparency, accountability, and integrity in all aspects of the electoral process. The outcome of a presidential election should reflect the will of the people, untainted by external interference or manipulation. While allegations of vote tampering or alteration are cause for concern, it is essential to approach these claims with a critical eye and a commitment to upholding the democratic values that form the bedrock of our society.

In the meantime, it is incumbent upon all citizens to remain vigilant and engaged in the democratic process, holding our elected officials accountable and demanding transparency and honesty in all electoral matters. The future of our democracy depends on our ability to safeguard the integrity of our elections and ensure that the will of the people is reflected accurately and honestly. Let us remain steadfast in our commitment to upholding the principles of democracy and fighting for a fair and just electoral system for all.

Federal law sets an Election Day, not an Election Week or Election Month or Election Winter. On Election Day, 2020, @realDonaldTrump had the votes to win the presidency. These vote totals were changed because of unprecedented and extraordinary counting after Election Day. This…

— Tom Fitton (@TomFitton) September 22, 2024

When it comes to elections in the United States, there are certain rules and regulations that govern the process. One of the most important of these rules is that Election Day is set by federal law. But what happens when the election process extends beyond that day? In a tweet from September 22, 2024, Tom Fitton raises the question of whether votes were changed after Election Day in the 2020 presidential election. Let’s delve into this topic further and explore the implications of such a claim.

What Does Federal Law Say About Election Day?

According to federal law, Election Day is a specific date set for the American people to cast their votes for various political offices, including the presidency. This day is typically the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November. The rationale behind having a designated Election Day is to ensure that there is a uniform and organized process for conducting elections across the country.

However, what happens when the counting of votes extends beyond Election Day? Does this violate federal law, as suggested in Fitton’s tweet? It’s essential to examine the specifics of what occurred during the 2020 presidential election to understand the context of this claim fully.

Was There Unprecedented Counting After Election Day in 2020?

In the 2020 presidential election, there was a significant increase in the number of mail-in and absentee ballots due to the COVID-19 pandemic. As a result, some states took longer to count all the votes, leading to delays in the final tally. This delay in counting votes does not necessarily mean that there was anything unlawful or unprecedented happening.

It is crucial to note that each state has its own set of rules and regulations regarding the counting of votes. As long as these rules are followed, the process is considered legitimate. However, if there were any violations of state election laws or instances of fraud, those would need to be investigated and addressed accordingly.

Did Vote Totals Change After Election Day?

One of the key points raised in Fitton’s tweet is the claim that vote totals were changed after Election Day in 2020. It is essential to differentiate between the initial reporting of results on Election Day and the final certification of those results. In many states, the final certification of election results can take several days or even weeks to complete.

During this certification process, election officials review and verify all ballots to ensure accuracy. If any discrepancies or irregularities are found, they are investigated and resolved before the results are certified. This process is crucial in maintaining the integrity of the election and ensuring that every vote is counted accurately.

What Are the Implications of Alleged Vote Changes?

If there is credible evidence to suggest that vote totals were changed unlawfully after Election Day, it raises serious concerns about the integrity of the election process. Any tampering with election results undermines the very foundation of democracy and erodes public trust in the electoral system.

It is essential for election officials, law enforcement agencies, and the judiciary to thoroughly investigate any claims of election fraud or misconduct. Transparency and accountability are paramount in ensuring that the will of the people is reflected accurately in the election results.

In conclusion, the claims made in Fitton’s tweet raise important questions about the integrity of the 2020 presidential election. While it is crucial to scrutinize and address any irregularities in the electoral process, it is equally important to do so based on evidence and facts. Upholding the rule of law and protecting the sanctity of elections is essential in preserving democracy for future generations.