No Pentagon screw up on Jan 6: Coordinated effort to prevent extra security.

By | September 21, 2024

SEE AMAZON.COM DEALS FOR TODAY

SHOP NOW

Alleged Coordinated Effort to Prevent National Guard Deployment on January 6th

So, there’s this tweet that’s been making the rounds on social media, claiming that there was no Pentagon screw up related to the deployment of the National Guard on January 6th. According to the tweet by Julie Kelly, the “optics” excuse was just that – an excuse to justify why guardsmen were not deployed. Allegedly, this was a coordinated effort between General Milley, Speaker Pelosi, and Department of Defense officials to prevent extra security on that fateful day.

Now, before we dive into this controversial claim, let’s take a step back and examine the events that unfolded on January 6th. The storming of the Capitol by a mob of supporters of then-President Trump was a dark day in American history. The chaos and violence that ensued left many shocked and questioning how such a breach of security could have occurred in the heart of our nation’s capital.

You may also like to watch : Who Is Kamala Harris? Biography - Parents - Husband - Sister - Career - Indian - Jamaican Heritage

In the aftermath of the attack, there were numerous questions raised about the response of law enforcement and the delay in deploying the National Guard to quell the violence. The lack of a swift and decisive response has been a point of contention and scrutiny in the months following the insurrection.

And now, this tweet by Julie Kelly is adding fuel to the fire by suggesting that there was more to the story than meets the eye. The claim that there was a coordinated effort to prevent the deployment of the National Guard raises serious questions about the motives and actions of those in positions of power on that day.

If these allegations are true, it would mean that there was a deliberate decision made to hold back additional security measures when they were most needed. The implications of such a revelation are staggering and raise concerns about the integrity and accountability of our leaders in times of crisis.

While it’s important to approach these claims with a healthy dose of skepticism and wait for more concrete evidence to emerge, the mere suggestion of a coordinated effort to prevent the deployment of the National Guard is deeply troubling. It calls into question the trust we place in our institutions and the individuals tasked with protecting our democracy.

You may also like to watch: Is US-NATO Prepared For A Potential Nuclear War With Russia - China And North Korea?

The tweet by Julie Kelly does not provide any concrete evidence to support these allegations, and it’s crucial to take such claims with a grain of salt until more information is available. However, the fact that these accusations are being made at all underscores the need for a thorough and transparent investigation into the events of January 6th.

As we continue to grapple with the aftermath of the Capitol insurrection and seek answers to the many questions that still linger, it’s essential that we approach these claims with an open mind and a commitment to uncovering the truth. The integrity of our democracy and the trust we place in our leaders depend on it.

In the meantime, let’s keep a close eye on how this story unfolds and remain vigilant in our pursuit of justice and accountability. The events of January 6th will forever be etched in our nation’s history, and it’s up to us to ensure that such a dark chapter is never repeated. Stay tuned for updates on this developing story as more information becomes available.

And remember, in times of uncertainty and doubt, it’s more important than ever to stand up for truth, justice, and the principles that define our democracy. Let’s continue to hold those in power accountable and demand transparency in all matters that impact the future of our nation. Thank you for reading and stay informed.

Guys, there was no Pentagon screw up related to deployment of National Guard on Jan 6. The “optics” excuse was just that—an excuse to justify why guardsmen were not deployed. This was a coordinated effort between Milley, Pelosi, and DOD officials to prevent extra security that

When it comes to the deployment of the National Guard on January 6th, there has been much speculation and controversy surrounding the actions taken by Pentagon officials. In a recent tweet by Julie Kelly, she claims that there was no screw up related to the deployment of the National Guard on that fateful day. According to Kelly, the excuse given for not deploying the guardsmen was merely a cover-up for a coordinated effort between General Milley, Speaker Pelosi, and DOD officials to prevent extra security measures from being implemented. But how much truth is there to these claims? Let’s delve deeper into the matter and explore the various aspects of this alleged conspiracy.

### Was there a Pentagon screw up related to the deployment of the National Guard on January 6th?

According to Julie Kelly’s tweet, there was no Pentagon screw up related to the deployment of the National Guard on January 6th. She asserts that the “optics” excuse used to justify why guardsmen were not deployed was just that—an excuse. This raises questions about the true motives behind the decision not to deploy additional security forces on that day. Was it really a coordinated effort to prevent extra security, as Kelly suggests, or were there other factors at play?

To better understand the situation, we need to look at the events leading up to January 6th and the response of government officials to the unfolding crisis. Reports suggest that there were warnings of potential violence in the days leading up to the Capitol riot, yet the deployment of the National Guard was delayed. This delay has raised suspicions about the motivations behind the decision-making process and whether there was indeed a coordinated effort to prevent extra security measures.

### What role did General Milley, Speaker Pelosi, and DOD officials play in this alleged conspiracy?

Julie Kelly claims that General Milley, Speaker Pelosi, and DOD officials were involved in a coordinated effort to prevent extra security measures from being implemented on January 6th. This is a serious accusation that raises questions about the integrity and trustworthiness of these high-ranking officials. But what evidence is there to support these claims?

It is important to note that allegations of collusion and conspiracy must be backed up by concrete evidence to be taken seriously. While Kelly’s tweet may raise eyebrows and spark curiosity, it is essential to scrutinize the facts and verify the authenticity of the claims being made. Without solid evidence to support these allegations, they remain nothing more than speculation and conjecture.

### What impact did the alleged conspiracy have on the events of January 6th?

If indeed there was a coordinated effort to prevent extra security measures on January 6th, the implications of such actions are significant. The Capitol riot resulted in chaos, destruction, and loss of life, raising serious questions about the security protocols in place and the response of government officials to the crisis. If high-ranking officials were complicit in hindering additional security measures, it calls into question their commitment to upholding the safety and well-being of the American people.

In times of crisis, it is crucial that government officials act swiftly and decisively to protect the public and maintain order. Any hint of collusion or conspiracy to undermine security measures is a betrayal of the trust placed in these officials and a breach of their duty to serve and protect. The events of January 6th serve as a stark reminder of the fragility of democracy and the importance of upholding the rule of law.

### Conclusion

In conclusion, the allegations made by Julie Kelly in her tweet raise troubling questions about the events of January 6th and the actions of General Milley, Speaker Pelosi, and DOD officials. While these claims may be shocking and controversial, it is essential to approach them with a critical eye and a healthy dose of skepticism. Without concrete evidence to support these allegations, they remain unsubstantiated and should be treated as such. As we reflect on the events of January 6th, let us strive to uncover the truth and hold those responsible for any wrongdoing to account. Only through transparency and accountability can we ensure that such a tragedy never happens again.