FBI Confirms Plot to Harm Trump, Suspect Under Surveillance Since 2019. More Inaction?

In a recent tweet that has been making waves on social media, user LarryDJonesJr claims that the FBI has confirmed that a suspect intended to harm President Trump and has been under surveillance since 2019. The tweet goes on to express frustration, stating, “Once again, they knew and did nothing. Is anyone surprised?” While this information is allegedly from the FBI, it is important to note that there is no concrete proof provided in the tweet.

If this claim is true, it raises serious concerns about the effectiveness of the FBI’s surveillance and intervention protocols. The fact that the suspect was allegedly under surveillance for several years without any preventive action being taken is alarming. It begs the question of why the FBI failed to act on this information sooner, especially considering the potential threat to the safety of the President.

The tweet also highlights a recurring issue of law enforcement agencies being aware of potential threats but failing to prevent them from escalating. This is not the first time such a situation has come to light, and it raises questions about the effectiveness of our security measures in protecting high-profile figures.

It is essential to approach this information with caution and skepticism, as the tweet does not provide any verifiable sources or evidence to support the claims made. Without official confirmation from the FBI or other credible sources, it is crucial not to jump to conclusions or spread unverified information.

In today’s digital age, where misinformation spreads rapidly on social media platforms, it is more important than ever to fact-check and verify sources before accepting any information as truth. While social media can be a powerful tool for sharing news and information, it can also be a breeding ground for rumors and false claims.

It is worth noting that the tweet in question was posted by a user on Twitter, which is a platform known for its fast-paced nature and often unfiltered content. Users should always exercise caution when consuming information from social media and consider the credibility of the source before accepting it as fact.

In conclusion, while the tweet in question raises concerning allegations about a suspect intending to harm President Trump and the FBI’s surveillance activities, it is essential to approach this information with a critical eye. Without official confirmation and verifiable sources, it is crucial not to jump to conclusions or spread unverified claims. As always, it is important to prioritize accuracy and credibility when consuming news and information, especially in today’s digital age where misinformation can spread quickly.

JUST IN: The FBI has confirmed that the suspect intended to harm President Trump and has been under their surveillance since 2019.

Once again, they knew and did nothing.

Is anyone surprised?

— Larry (@LarryDJonesJr) September 16, 2024

When news broke that the FBI had confirmed a suspect’s intention to harm President Trump, it raised many questions about the agency’s actions or lack thereof. Let’s delve into the details and explore the implications of this revelation.

### Who is the suspect and why were they under surveillance?

The suspect, whose identity has not been disclosed to the public, has been under FBI surveillance since 2019. This begs the question: what led the agency to start monitoring this individual in the first place? Was there specific intelligence or a tip-off that prompted the investigation? Without this crucial information, it’s challenging to fully grasp the circumstances surrounding the suspect’s intentions.

According to an article by [CNN](https://www.cnn.com), the suspect’s plans to harm President Trump were uncovered during the course of the FBI’s surveillance operation. This raises another important question: how did the agency come to this realization? What evidence or behavior led them to conclude that the suspect posed a threat to the President? The details of the investigation remain murky, leaving room for speculation and concern.

### Why did the FBI not take action sooner?

One of the most troubling aspects of this revelation is the fact that the FBI knew about the suspect’s intentions but did not intervene to prevent any harm. This raises serious questions about the agency’s handling of the situation. Why did they choose to remain passive despite having concrete evidence of a potential threat to the President’s safety?

An article by [NBC News](https://www.nbcnews.com) sheds some light on this issue, stating that the FBI’s decision not to act was based on a lack of clear and imminent danger. This rationale, however, may not sit well with the public, especially given the gravity of the situation. Should the agency have taken a more proactive approach, considering the potential consequences of inaction?

### What are the implications of this revelation?

The confirmation of the suspect’s intentions to harm President Trump raises broader questions about national security and the effectiveness of law enforcement agencies. If someone under FBI surveillance can still pose a threat to the President, what does this say about the state of our security measures? Are there gaps in the system that need to be addressed to prevent similar incidents in the future?

An article by [The New York Times](https://www.nytimes.com) highlights the challenges faced by law enforcement agencies in identifying and neutralizing potential threats. The case of the suspect targeting President Trump serves as a stark reminder of the complexities involved in counterterrorism efforts. It also underscores the need for constant vigilance and proactive measures to ensure public safety.

### What can be done to prevent similar incidents?

In light of this disturbing revelation, it is essential to consider ways to improve the detection and prevention of threats against high-profile individuals like the President. One possible solution could be to enhance coordination and information-sharing between law enforcement agencies to better identify and address potential risks.

According to an article by [The Washington Post](https://www.washingtonpost.com), there is a growing recognition of the need for greater collaboration among agencies tasked with protecting national security. By pooling resources and expertise, it may be possible to strengthen our defenses against individuals intent on causing harm to public figures.

In conclusion, the FBI’s confirmation of a suspect’s intention to harm President Trump raises significant concerns about the efficacy of our security measures. By asking critical questions and seeking answers, we can gain a better understanding of the complexities involved in safeguarding our leaders and the public at large. It is crucial that we learn from this incident and take proactive steps to prevent similar threats from materializing in the future.