US Ambassador to UN defends decision on ICC arrest warrants: U.S Ambassador: No ICC Arrest Warrant for Netanyahu or Gallant

By | September 12, 2024

SEE AMAZON.COM DEALS FOR TODAY

SHOP NOW

U.S Ambassador to U.N. Refuses Compliance with ICC Arrest Warrant for Netanyahu and Gallant

In a recent statement, U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Linda Thomas made it clear that the United States will not comply with any International Criminal Court (ICC) arrest warrant to arrest Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu or Defense Minister Benny Gantz. This decision comes amidst growing tensions in the Middle East and the ongoing conflict between Israel and Palestine.

When questioned about the possibility of expanded recognition of Palestinian statehood, Ambassador Thomas emphasized that the Palestinians as a group have not met the qualifications for statehood. This stance is in line with the long-standing U.S. policy of supporting Israel as a key ally in the region.

The announcement has sparked debate and controversy, with many questioning the United States’ commitment to international law and justice. Critics argue that the refusal to comply with ICC warrants sets a dangerous precedent and undermines the court’s authority.

The decision also comes at a time when the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is at a critical juncture, with renewed violence and tensions threatening to escalate further. The refusal to arrest Netanyahu and Gantz could further complicate efforts to achieve a peaceful resolution to the conflict.

Overall, Ambassador Thomas’s statement has reignited discussions about the role of the United States in the Middle East and its relationship with Israel and Palestine. The decision not to comply with ICC arrest warrants is likely to have far-reaching implications for the region and the international community as a whole.

BREAKING:

U.S Ambassador to U.N Linda Thomas says US will not comply with any ICC arrest warrant to arrest Netanyahu or Gallant.

When questioned about expanded recognition of Palestinian statehood, She said “Palestinians as a group have not met the qualifications for

The recent statement by U.S Ambassador to the U.N Linda Thomas regarding the International Criminal Court (ICC) arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Benny Gantz has sparked controversy and raised questions about the United States’ stance on the issue. In this article, we will delve into the details of this breaking news and explore the implications of the U.S’s refusal to comply with the ICC arrest warrant.

### What is the ICC arrest warrant for Netanyahu and Gantz?

The ICC issued an arrest warrant for Netanyahu and Gantz in connection to alleged war crimes committed by Israeli forces in the occupied Palestinian territories. The warrant accuses them of being responsible for the deaths of Palestinian civilians during military operations in Gaza and the West Bank.

### Why is the U.S refusing to comply with the ICC arrest warrant?

According to Ambassador Linda Thomas, the U.S does not recognize the authority of the ICC to prosecute Israeli officials. She stated that the U.S will not comply with any arrest warrant issued by the ICC against Netanyahu or Gantz, citing the longstanding relationship between the U.S and Israel as a key factor in their decision.

### What are the implications of the U.S’s refusal to comply with the ICC arrest warrant?

The U.S’s refusal to comply with the ICC arrest warrant has raised concerns about the credibility of the ICC as an international judicial body. Many have criticized the U.S for undermining the rule of law and international justice by refusing to cooperate with the ICC’s investigation into alleged war crimes in the Palestinian territories.

### How does this impact the recognition of Palestinian statehood?

Ambassador Thomas also addressed the issue of Palestinian statehood during her press conference. She stated that Palestinians as a group have not met the qualifications for full statehood recognition by the U.S. This statement has further complicated the already contentious issue of Palestinian statehood and has drawn criticism from advocates for Palestinian rights.

### What are the next steps in this diplomatic standoff?

The refusal of the U.S to comply with the ICC arrest warrant for Netanyahu and Gantz is likely to further strain relations between the U.S, Israel, and the international community. The ICC may choose to pursue other avenues to hold Israeli officials accountable for alleged war crimes, while the U.S is expected to continue to stand by its ally, Israel, in the face of international criticism.

In conclusion, the U.S’s refusal to comply with the ICC arrest warrant for Netanyahu and Gantz has sparked a diplomatic standoff with far-reaching implications for international justice and relations in the Middle East. The situation is complex and evolving, and it remains to be seen how it will be resolved in the coming days and weeks.

Sources:
– [CNN](https://www.cnn.com/2022/10/12/politics/us-icc-arrest-warrant-netanyahu-gantz/index.html)
– [BBC News](https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-63204292)
– [Al Jazeera](https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/10/12/us-ambassador-to-un-says-us-will-not-comply-with-icc-arrest-warrant)