Manipur Government Suspends Internet Amid Statewide Protests: Hypocrisy in Media Coverage

In a surprising turn of events, the Manipur government has decided to suspend internet services across the state in response to widespread protests led by students and women against the ruling BJP party. This move has sparked outrage among many, with critics pointing out the lack of coverage and debate on this issue by mainstream media outlets, commonly referred to as “Godi Media.”

The lack of attention from media personalities and anchors, both on television and social media platforms, has led to accusations of hypocrisy and bias in reporting. The silence from these influential figures has only served to highlight the disconnect between the concerns of the public and the coverage provided by mainstream media channels.

The decision to suspend internet services in Manipur comes at a time when access to information and communication is more critical than ever. As protests continue to escalate and tensions rise, the absence of a public discourse on this issue only adds fuel to the fire.

It is essential for media outlets to uphold their responsibility to report on all sides of a story, especially when it involves government actions that impact the lives of citizens. The lack of coverage on the Manipur internet shutdown raises questions about the integrity and impartiality of mainstream media in India.

In conclusion, the suspension of internet services in Manipur and the subsequent lack of media coverage highlights the need for a more transparent and balanced approach to reporting on sensitive issues. It is crucial for all voices to be heard and for the media to provide a platform for open and honest debate.

BREAKING NEWS

Manipur govt has suspended Internet due to state wide protest from students and women against BJP

There is no debate on this issue in Godi Media

There is no agitation from any anchor even on Twitter

H Y P O C R I S Y

— Amock_ (@Amockx2022) September 10, 2024

What led to the suspension of internet in Manipur?

In a surprising turn of events, the Manipur government has decided to suspend internet services in the state. This decision comes in response to widespread protests from students and women against the ruling BJP government. The protests have been fueled by a range of issues, including concerns over the controversial Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) and the recent passing of the Manipur People’s Bill. As tensions continue to rise, the government has taken the drastic step of cutting off internet access in an attempt to quell the unrest.

One of the main reasons behind the suspension of internet services is the fear of misinformation spreading online. In today’s digital age, social media platforms have become powerful tools for organizing protests and spreading information. By shutting down the internet, the government hopes to prevent the spread of rumors and fake news that could further inflame the situation. However, this move has been met with criticism from human rights organizations, who argue that it infringes on the right to freedom of speech and expression.

Why is there a lack of coverage in mainstream media?

Despite the gravity of the situation in Manipur, there has been a noticeable absence of coverage in mainstream media outlets. This lack of attention raises questions about the role of the media in shaping public discourse and holding those in power accountable. The term “Godi Media” has been used to describe media organizations that are perceived to be overly supportive of the government and uncritical in their reporting. In this case, it appears that these outlets are choosing to ignore the protests in Manipur, raising concerns about their impartiality and commitment to journalistic integrity.

The silence from mainstream media outlets is particularly striking given the severity of the situation in Manipur. The suspension of internet services is a significant step that has far-reaching implications for the residents of the state. Without access to the internet, people are cut off from vital sources of information and communication, making it difficult for them to stay informed about the latest developments. In the absence of coverage from mainstream media, it falls to alternative sources of news and social media to keep the public informed about what is happening in Manipur.

Is there a double standard in the way protests are covered?

The lack of coverage of the protests in Manipur highlights a potential double standard in the way protests are covered by the media. When protests align with the interests of those in power, they are often downplayed or ignored altogether. However, when protests are seen as a threat to the status quo, they receive extensive coverage and scrutiny. This disparity in coverage raises questions about the media’s role in shaping public perception and influencing political outcomes.

The protests in Manipur are a clear example of the power dynamics at play in the media landscape. By choosing to ignore the protests, mainstream media outlets are effectively silencing the voices of those who are speaking out against the government. This raises concerns about the media’s ability to act as a watchdog and hold those in power accountable. As the protests in Manipur continue to unfold, it is essential that the media fulfills its role in providing accurate and comprehensive coverage of the situation.

In conclusion, the suspension of internet services in Manipur and the lack of coverage in mainstream media raise important questions about freedom of speech, media bias, and the role of the media in democratic societies. It is crucial that we continue to critically examine the way protests are covered and ensure that all voices are heard in the public discourse. As the situation in Manipur develops, it is essential that we remain vigilant and hold those in power accountable for their actions.