LA Times Under Fire for Burying Two Critical Stories

The recent controversy surrounding the LA Times has sparked outrage among the public, with two breaking stories being buried by the publication. The first story involves Diana Teran, an indicted felony suspect who is still being paid by DA Gascon, in clear violation of LA CO CSC rule 18.01. This revelation has raised serious questions about the integrity and ethics of the District Attorney’s office.

The second buried story pertains to detailed polling data on the DA race between Gascon and Hochman. Despite possessing this crucial information, the LA Times has chosen to keep it under wraps, depriving the public of valuable insights into the upcoming election. This decision has been met with widespread criticism and calls for transparency from the publication.

The failure of the LA Times to report on these important developments has raised concerns about the media’s role in holding public officials accountable. By neglecting to cover these stories, the publication has failed in its duty to inform the public and uphold the principles of journalism.

As the controversy continues to unfold, it is clear that the LA Times must address these issues and provide the public with the information they deserve. The suppression of critical stories undermines the credibility of the publication and threatens the integrity of the democratic process. It is essential that media outlets prioritize transparency and accountability in order to fulfill their role as watchdogs of society.

Two #BREAKING stories, both buried by the @latimes :
1. Diana Teran, indicted felony suspect, still being paid by DA Gascon, in violation of LA CO CSC rule 18.01.
2. The Times has detailed polling data on DA race between Gascon and Hochman, and they’re sitting on it.@LAmag…

— Alex Villanueva (@AlexVilanueva33) August 17, 2024

You may also like to watch: Is US-NATO Prepared For A Potential Nuclear War With Russia - China And North Korea?

In a shocking turn of events, two crucial stories have been buried by the Los Angeles Times, raising questions about transparency and accountability in the local government. Let’s delve into the details of these #BREAKING stories that have been swept under the rug by the mainstream media.

Who is Diana Teran and why is she still being paid by DA Gascon?

Diana Teran, a felony suspect, has been indicted and is still receiving payment from District Attorney Gascon, despite being in clear violation of LA County CSC rule 18.01. This raises serious concerns about the integrity of the legal system and the ethical standards of those in positions of power.

According to a report by LA Mag, the decision to continue paying Teran, who is facing serious criminal charges, goes against the basic principles of justice and fairness. It begs the question: why is Gascon allowing someone accused of felony crimes to continue receiving taxpayer-funded salary?

The lack of transparency surrounding this issue is deeply troubling. It is essential for the public to know why Teran is still on the payroll and what steps are being taken to address this blatant violation of ethical standards. The silence from the Los Angeles Times on this matter only adds to the confusion and frustration felt by the community.

What is the detailed polling data on the DA race between Gascon and Hochman?

The Los Angeles Times has access to detailed polling data on the District Attorney race between Gascon and Hochman, yet they have chosen to keep this information under wraps. This raises serious questions about the media’s role in informing the public and holding elected officials accountable.

The decision to withhold this crucial information from the public is deeply concerning. The outcome of the DA race will have a significant impact on the criminal justice system in Los Angeles, and voters deserve to have access to all relevant data before casting their ballots.

By keeping this polling data hidden, the Los Angeles Times is failing in its duty to provide unbiased and comprehensive coverage of important political events. It is essential for the media to be transparent and forthcoming with information that could influence the outcome of an election.

In conclusion, the burying of these two #BREAKING stories by the Los Angeles Times raises serious questions about the media’s role in holding those in power accountable. The public deserves to know the truth about what is happening in their local government, and it is up to journalists to provide that information without bias or censorship. It is time for the mainstream media to prioritize transparency and integrity in their reporting, and to give the people the information they need to make informed decisions about their elected officials.